In post 448, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 437, LoHa wrote:VOTE: pisskop
Fun stops now, scum.
This guy hasn't done anything either.
Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.
Do you think offering up a lynch candidate will make the subject line that is currently you go away?
In post 446, pisskop wrote:le lul @ laho trying to vote me.
In post 437, LoHa wrote:VOTE: pisskop
Fun stops now, scum.
This guy hasn't done anything either.
Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.
vote: laho
In post 452, LoHa wrote:In post 446, pisskop wrote:le lul @ laho trying to vote me.
In post 437, LoHa wrote:VOTE: pisskop
Fun stops now, scum.
This guy hasn't done anything either.
Let's see if he'll omgus like the other or what.
vote: laho
I don't like sheeping aquaman sheeping titus in butchering my username.
In post 436, LoHa wrote:Meanwhile I'll take home the fact that aquaman doesn't know why Titus' vote is on me either and that I'm in his lynch pool because my play is thin. Does my postcount or the substance bother you? I've made two alignment indicative arguments for titusscum, the produce of my thin play. You call me scummy because my play is thin, I'd expect a townie with such a fat play as yours to come up with better arguments to base a lynch on, or at least sheep the ones that make sense.
Are you talkative scum?
In post 465, Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
In post 465, Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
In post 465, Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
