Will get to this. Was vaguely watching along while I felt like trash and particularly remember a few things bugging me - I'll do one of those nice catchup posts.
Shiro has gathered all game relevant Dav posts from Nether game for you convenience ^_^
Spoiler:
In post 82, Davsto wrote:So basically you're pandering to the confirmed town and buddying up to them knowing that they have the most power in the game right now so hopefully they won't decide to lynch you if you're nice to them? Because that's the air that I'm getting.
I've seen honest reads be entirely wrong and bullshit reads be entirely right. That's why I prefer to think for myself and look at the case before deciding "oh I think it's alright" and voting it, rather than going "mmkay so this conftown person is voting it so I should too".
In post 127, Davsto wrote:I probably should have done this while discussing with Spiffeh but I don't think I actually did (which is also why I dislike the "overreacted to the vote on me" comment considering there wasn't one).
VOTE: Spiffeh
In post 132, Davsto wrote:I am not comfortable with a massclaim today. It is likely to result in people who are both conftown
and
a good power role and I am seriously against it.
In post 134, Davsto wrote:That is to say, it gives scum the knowledge of some really, really good nightkill targets.
In post 136, Davsto wrote:I don't see how massclaim would be useful. Due to the three "Random Town" slots in the setup, scum can basically just claim any of the non-unique roles and be fine.
In post 138, Davsto wrote:I'm pretty sure Town Random can literally be any town role, and because they're randomly distributed Scum can just claim any non-unique roles and they can't be counterclaimed since there can be duplicates.
In post 141, Davsto wrote:Meh. I'm not sold on it. Negatives don't seem to outweigh the positives.
And, from these posts alone, you have magically deduced that they are scum how exactly?
In post 181, Davsto wrote:My thoughts are that was literally their last post made onsite so we wait for a replacement before we start going after them.
In post 186, Delenn wrote:@Dave, Great. I see you don't like mine. Who do you like then?
No-one, at the current time. I'm a misanthrope.
But in all seriousness, it's a tad to early for me to get any clear reads yet. Sometimes I can latch onto something easily but sometimes it takes a while. I'm open to a Jeanne one if the inevitable replacement is bad but right now, it's a silly wagon.
In post 190, Delenn wrote:@Davesto, We gotta get two wagons in six days. Yeah, this isn't ironclad case territory we're talking about here. We're lynching dead weight anti-town and doing it fast.
We have 6 days for each lynch.
I just finished a game where each day had a 5 day deadline. We don't rush around lynching the first person we can. We still have almost a week to think about each wagon. Panicking is a terrible idea, as we just learnt.
In post 210, Davsto wrote:Or I might be being purposefully obtuse and silly because too many players have a post count < 0 for me to be comfortable lynching again. My vote is essentially on Shiro though~
In post 212, Davsto wrote:I was waiting for Shiro to say some super scummy reply to the vote on you honestly but she seems to have poofed away so
In post 215, Delenn wrote:@Heartless, All meta is garbage and prone to the very criticisms you say here.
That's not a strained angle. Meta is only a personality tell. Meta shows she's aggressive as scum.
Vote me for having the balls to disagree with conftown.
The only difference between the wagons is I am objecting and Spiffeh was trying to get himself lynched.
Here's my view of what you're saying.
Heartless: I want to lynch town cuz meta.
Me: No. Let's lynch Spiffeh who isn't town and ignore bad meta.
Heartless: Well Spiffeh wasn't groupscum, let's lynch town.
Me: No.
Heartless: Well there's resistance to lynching town, so it must be scum.
Me:
okay so
Heartless: vote shiro
Delenn: give reasons
Heartless: *gives reasons*
Delenn: no
In post 224, Heartless wrote:titus, for all intents and purposes, spiffeh was a mislynch
QFT
???
To me a good lynch is any lynch that avoids town...why do you think it was a mislynch?
You're saying that a lynch that didn't hit Mafia/Evil Neutral is good? The fact that the grief lynch has a chance of hitting town is good? The fact that we got no sort of helpful result from said lynch is good?
In post 224, Heartless wrote:titus, for all intents and purposes, spiffeh was a mislynch
acknowledge that, or i'm lynching you
Hardly. He was being pretty scummy(Which apparently was on purpuse). He was a jester trying to get lynched without showing that he was a jester.
@Delenn I actually do think Ank has potential to be scum. Davsto is sheeping conftown and I find that suspicious since he was one of those that said we should not do so just cause he is conftown because Honest=/= right
Difference:
Then, he was all "lynch Shiro"
Now, he's all "lynch Shiro because of these good reasons".
There's a noticeable difference in there, don't you think?
In post 159, Davsto wrote:At least that's one Neutral out of the way. Better for a Jester to be out early rather than fucking up lylo for us all.
As in, "it'd be better if we hadn't lynched him at all and we just nightkilled him or something but if we do lynch it's better now than then."
Also, note that I was unaware of the Jester-grief-kill at the time of that post.
In post 376, Davsto wrote:Okay so I didn't claim yesterday because I didn't want to out myself because I am a
I'm willing to bet that "ika-looking" post was scum faking it to avoid an ika. The reason we're not voting ika now anyway is because it's more important to get Mafia/Killing Neutral out of the way than it is to get a Judge killed, since the Maf/Neut have night actions while the Judge will be powerless after today. Us town are going for Runner but I highly doubt we'll manage it before scum get their way with Ank.
This was me.
PEdit - I recall someone else claiming town investigative at some point. I don't think they specified, but I remember someone doing it.
In post 388, Davsto wrote:Apparently no-one said they were investigative like I thought I saw when reading through. I know I've been tired this weekend but apparently I've been hallucinating counterclaims too.
In post 399, Davsto wrote:I'm genuinely confused as to how that line of reasoning makes any logical sense. Also, as to how I - who has a currently conftown claim with only two people having not claimed yet - is in the "scum" pile, whilst the two people who haven't claimed are in my Investigative slot.
Also yeh it's not like Kidnapper is literally made to be a fakeclaim for Jailor amirite. I mean she didn't submit the kill for multiple reasons (we know she's not godfather) but ya know.
*points also a little bit at a mafia nokill gambit*
In post 431, Davsto wrote:I mean I'm gonna believe Framer for now but ya know.
In post 433, Davsto wrote:Okay now I'm actually paying attention to the game I realise that Shiro is probably not scum. Probably.
ugh this is confusing
In post 436, Davsto wrote:Sorry, I kinda panicked. I got a guilty and when the two people trying to talk me out of following it were the person I got a guilty on and someone else I scumread a bit yesterday (as being a potential partner too!) so I kinda just ignored what you were saying at first when you seemed to be trying to cast shadow onto me. Now you've properly explained it I see what you're on about.
Sorry about that :/
In post 439, Davsto wrote:So... hiplop is saying he didn't make a single post apart from voting during the Court
and the vote was on Ankamius, who we discerned early to be a scum-motivated wagon?
Yeh, hip's almost certainly the Judge. Looking at it, Judge's writing style is kinda hip-y.
Town Government - Heartless (Marshall)
Town Investigative - Davsto (Sheriff)
Town Protective - Titus (Escort)
Town Killing or Power - Ankamius (Vigilante)
Town Random - ika/hiplop (Crier)
Town Random - Bins (Crier)
Town Random - Shiro (Jailer)
Godfather - Runner (seems like about a right Jailing target for Shiro, too!)
Mafia Support - Jeanne (Consort)
Mafia Deception - Bella (Framer)
Neutral Killing - Aristophanes (Arsonist)
Neutral Evil or Benign - hiplop/ika (Judge)
Neutral Evil or Benign - Spiffeh (Jester)
That's my guess. Confirms in bold. Really unsure on ika/hiplop, idk, gah. Thing is ika had a post that was apparently him and not-Court during the Jury but I don't know anymore :/
In post 457, Davsto wrote:I reckon that Runner is the target for today. Seems like the most likely possibility for the Godfather by very far, and isn't an ambiguous "maybe, maybe not" like Me/Bella and Delenn/Jeane. Judge isn't
really
something to worry about honestly.
PEdit what in the butts are you on about Jeanne!?
PEdit thoughts too - if we get the Godfather (almost certainly Runner) lynched today, then scum cannot nightkill anymore, right..?
In post 467, Delenn wrote:I think the tide has turned. Scum could have shot runner to frame them/infoless kill (presuming Shiro jailed runner by poe).
Dave jumping on there was really opportunistic.
VOTE: Dave
If Runner claims invest, we sort him and Bella tomorrow.
If Runner claims protective, we sort him/me or the criers.
Dave's scumflip should clear Bella.
You're adorable. How in the hell is jumping on practically confirmed scum (see: Runner and Shiro blocking them) opportunistic? It's common goddamn sense!
In post 467, Delenn wrote:I think the tide has turned. Scum could have shot runner to frame them/infoless kill (presuming Shiro jailed runner by poe).
Dave jumping on there was really opportunistic.
VOTE: Dave
If Runner claims invest, we sort him and Bella tomorrow.
If Runner claims protective, we sort him/me or the criers.
Dave's scumflip should clear Bella.
You're adorable. How in the hell is jumping on practically confirmed scum (see: Runner and Shiro blocking them) opportunistic? It's common goddamn sense!
Not if you killed Runner. Why didn't you vote Bella who is a 1 v 1 as framer in your view?
Don't want to limit the pool?
Because I was (and still am) tired as fuck and as a result my play is shit and screwed up.
Why didn't you vote Jeanne who is 1v1 as a Consort in your view?
In post 486, Davsto wrote:goddamn it I'm too tired to deal with this crap, it's 10 PM, hopefully you get this sorted out by tonight.
In case you guys mislynch me though, you can still win!
Shiro jails Runner and executes
Titus blocks Jeanne so that the execute can't be blocked, and vice versa just in case because ya know
that way it should take it down to 4:2:1 tomorrow
lynch Bella for obvious reasons, and then hope to christ you can find last scum
In post 487, Davsto wrote:Sorry for any outbursts, I'm in a really crappy mood :/
I'm just annoyed because Delenn is tunneling as the only read there is on me is the "faked guilty" which literally could have been caused by a Framer which is what even they suggested at first but apparently they've now changed their mind (?)
In post 489, Delenn wrote:@Jeanne, then if you think I am pulling a fast one, you should be voting Bella. Mathematically there's no other option supposing you're town.
@Dave, The faked guilty is the biggest part in your opportunism.
I will be back later.
But
It's not faked
saiodhflsduighuizdhbfuildzflzdn
This is the stupidest argument I've ever heard!
If you literally have no other proof for me being scum than literally something that is probable (I investigate someone who is being framed) then you should really reconsider if you're even slightly right.
This is the most bullshit line of reasoning I've ever heard!
Meanwhile you're sitting there proud that you've got "teh rite resoningg !!!one!!" ignoring the fact that Bella is nowhere to be seen whilst all the pressure is on me.
In post 560, Davsto wrote:This isn't a bad AtE, I'm genuinely fucking pissed off at your bullshit. You're town, Delenn, have some goddamn sense!
If we lynch Bella she'll flip Framer and that clears me, and
HOW IN THE ARSE IS RUNNER TOWN!?
If Runner is town then how in hell was there no kill last night? Your reads make no fucking sense.
In post 562, Davsto wrote:Also I just realised the tactic won't work because you can't nightkill a Godfather.
In post 563, Davsto wrote:So I don't know what the fuck to do now, because if you lynch me there's a plenty good chance we're fucked. Nice job breaking it, hero.
In post 143, Bellaphant wrote:I think Ika's theory isn't terrible, actaully. Narrowing down from the claimed vts and pr without counter can work. Will address this more later.
In post 450, Bellaphant wrote:Yeah, I can't see a way for there to be two investigatives, and the way dave claimed was super susp.
townie
In post 512, Bellaphant wrote:Ika, runner hasn't claimed. I'm investigative, are visited you last night and set in fire, which maybe you didn't get killed bc of jeanne?? Dave is scum.
She is harping on me being scum when clearly I am not. The fact is I know I am town. And seeing she is ignoring that possibility, I think she is consort. I have my sights set on her.
I am town escort
@ika come on, you must have receive some notification. The mod said so couple of posts ago. I am re-checking with them.
Lynching between you two right now is not wise
If I could pick jail target at night it would have been possible but right now it isn't because a mistake means you will stop my execution of potential scum in order not to lose
Also Dav will confirm runner and Bella as scum if he flips town, you or Delenn will provide nothing and even if u.are right and Delenn flips scum I would have to get lucky between 3 targets before flip to stop the kill since she is confirmed roleblocker.
Dav sorry but you are the best lynch for today
I gotcha, now we know that Godfather can be executed, that's the choice.
That gets rid of a majority of the scum, leaving one Mafioso. You can probably figure it out from thereon.
I'm not gonna self-vote because that deprives you of any information you can get from votes on my wagon, but I'm not gonna bother defending myself anymore since I am fully aware that I am the best lynch, since it confirms both Runner and Bella as scum.
In post 576, Jeanne11 wrote:@Delenn Why won't you consider the possibility that I am town?
Right
You see the setup?
We know that, if there are two roles of a particular category (Escort is Protective), one of them must either be Town Random or Scum.
However, we are largely aware that in the Town randoms, two of them are Criers and the other is Shiro, a Jailer, due to the flipped roles.
Thus, one of you or Titus must be scum, and from her PoV it's obviously going to be you.
This is also why me flipping Sheriff confirms both Runner and Bella as scum - there can only be one Town Investigative.
Shiro - you jailed yet?
In post 606, Davsto wrote:The resistance to my wagon from Jeanne is basically a scumclaim, because she knows that, when I flip town, her scumteam has lost.
In post 607, Davsto wrote:Out of Jeanne/Delenn, I'm really damn sure that Jeanne is the scum. Scum!Delenn would have probably pushed my Framer guilty.
In post 619, Jeanne11 wrote:@Delenn Any proof I am scum? And I mean real proof, like an action or something, not make believe.
See the whole chart I made with people and alignments and stuffs regarding the different types of roles? If Shiro is town, then there are three Town Randoms (two Criers+a Jailer), and thus you cannot both be roles which fit into the same category. She'd have to be insane not to scumread you.
PEdit Why would I want them to jail you? Runner is the one that needs to be jailed, since he's the Godfather. And frankly, I'll never convince them not to vote me, in a million years. I'm not self-voting, but for town I'm the optimal lynch.
From their PoV, I'm scum, and lynching me is good for obvious reasons.
From my PoV, I'm town, and lynching me will tell them that so that they can carry out that win strategy I talked about.
PEdit PEdit dammit Delenn
In post 625, Davsto wrote:Out of Delenn/Jeanne, pretty sure that Jeanne is scum. Several moves of hers are blatantly trying to prevent us from following our winning strategy, for example...
She is harping on me being scum when clearly I am not. The fact is I know I am town. And seeing she is ignoring that possibility, I think she is consort. I have my sights set on her.
I am town escort
@ika come on, you must have receive some notification. The mod said so couple of posts ago. I am re-checking with them.
Trying to prevent my lynch because she knows I'll flip town, incriminating two of her teammates.
Only a Godfather or Mafioso can do a night kill.
I blocked Shiro, who confirms that. So I could not have stopped the nightkill.
Jeanne claims to have blocked ika, who has not confirmed. Even if she did, ika has no night action and thus could not have killed. Thus Jeanne didn't stop the kill.
Shiro jailed Runner. Thus runner is the killer or was the kill target. Shiro is conftown.
Dave has a "guilty" on conftown allegedly. He's probably scum reaching for a fast victory rather than a framer existing.
If I am wrong and Dave flips town, Runner is executed, lynch Bella tomorrow. Then Jeanne. Then sort criers.
Also adding to this that Shiro definitely couldn't have been a Godfather being blocked from the NK because I got a "Mafia" result, which you don't get on Godfathers as it's town.
Really sad though. If the RNG for Framer had given me a Cult result, I've had called that and this whole fiasco would be over.
Oh welllll
In post 643, Davsto wrote:Identity of the Judge doesn't matter. They can't win if we get the three scum lynched as I'm fairly sure town'll manage considering that two people are confirmed scum once I flip.
In post 647, Jeanne11 wrote:Well, here is my answer to you davsto: If ika is lying about not receiving the message, that means I did roleblock her which proves me as an escort. As for role placement, Delenn could be lying about being escort and is actually a consort. However, since you all except Shiro are following Delenn blindly like a sheep, this statement would mean nothing to any of you that isn't Shiro.
In post 652, Jeanne11 wrote:@Dave I am on about how you all are following Delenn like she is speaking the truth and I am a liar while not even considering the possibility that it could be other way around......
Delenn didn't suggest this plan of action of lynch me -> jail and execute runner -> lynch Bella tomorrow -> lynch ??? -> profit. I did. I'm comfortable enough with that.
In post 657, Davsto wrote:I am considering the possibility that it is the other way around. This has no change to my actions today.
PEdit everyone has the possibility of being town when they're wanted to be lynched. It's a risk, and without it Mafia would be boring.
PEdit PEdit I'm not advocating for your lynch today, my flip is getting Runner killed and Bella lynched, where the hell do you come into it? What do you want me to do? Or are you just randomly spewing out AtE and flailing in the hope that something good happens?
In post 697, ika wrote:shiro should nto execute regardless though if runner is gf mostly due to the fact we can keep the nk in check and lynch entirely outside of it and contune
If Shiro doesn't execute scum then scum controls the votes. When I flip town, Runner is confirmed scum, almost certainly Godfather. There are no Mafiosi either so no-one can make the nightkill until there's one scum left, who then becomes Mafioso.
I've thought about this enough because, when I'm the basically-certain lynch for the day, the most useful thing to do is find a way in which town can still win upon my death.
Titus did the actual problem but this post is easier to post - holy selective meta Batman! Because I was town in Netherspite and am not behaving exactly as I did in Netherspite, I absolutely must be scum here! Even if I have towngames which vary and are similar to this! Christ on a bike.
In post 193, Davsto wrote:Man, I remember the last time I played a Large Normal.
MarioManiac4 replaced in and had a speedlynch on him, resulting in his death.
He was town.
I'm learning from that lesson. Mario is likely not scum. I've only played one game with scum!Mario, but I definitely don't remember it being like this.
Firebringer has changed his avatar from Toothless and that hurts me.
UNVOTE:
Not sure how I feel about certain players.
MM wagon is likely to contain mostly town with one scum max.
Unsure where to go next.
Mario wagon sucks but everyone's town. I like everyone. Like me too.
So now having vague townreads is buddying? Fucking hell.
In post 67, Heartless wrote:I would've really liked to use it later but the chances of this hydra making it very far in this game isn't great given our recent nightkill record.
Let's get cracking.
Get cracking what? Skulls? Because I'm unsure of that.
In post 82, Davsto wrote:So basically you're pandering to the confirmed town and buddying up to them knowing that they have the most power in the game right now so hopefully they won't decide to lynch you if you're nice to them? Because that's the air that I'm getting.
In post 127, Davsto wrote:I probably should have done this while discussing with Spiffeh but I don't think I actually did (which is also why I dislike the "overreacted to the vote on me" comment considering there wasn't one).
VOTE: Spiffeh
In post 175, Davsto wrote:Oh well. It's not like we gained a ridiculous amount of info from said flip. Mod errors happen.
We should lynch her before she goes all VCA on us.
That is an RVS vote by scum on me in another game. Said player then claimed it was a joke.
In post 569, Blackest Magick wrote:To be honest I almost never understand vote count analysis. I've only understood it when reading the hidden temple game since it was obvious with how it was scum vs molla and all scum were on molla. I find vote count analysis confusing usually and I guess xtoxm thinks titus would use it to her advantage. xtoxm probably finished another game with titus elsewhere where titus used VCA to her advantage and xtoxm was thus trying to get back at her during rvs
_____________
UNVOTE:
until caught up
BM was scum in a game I just finished. One head of the hydra voted me in RVS because I was a threat and rightfully called out on it. When called out on it, the other head walked it back saying it was ribbing me.
Dave makes a vote based on me allegedly being a threat. He then claims joke.
Don't think so.
Many times scum fear monger me. Not today.
Okay, fuck this shit. Like, actually fuck this shit.
Even if you ignore the rest of this post for whatever reason, read this shit because it is important as hell.
Now, the game she links, she selectively chooses someone who was scum because they joked about something and then made it serious later. Not to mention the fact that mine was obviously a joke (hate of gambler's fallacy and all), and that I haven't actually made it serious yet (and never will). These are nothing compared to the worst part of this.
See this? This was literally in the same fucking game, this guy was town, and basically said what I said. But no, she picks the example that allows her to paint me as scummy as possible.
This is why, VOTE: Titus.
I know this post has been Titus-centric, but she has posted the most stuff that catches my eye. I just don't feel that anyone who would provide the meta thing from Magick and remember it so well to use it to compare to me to show how I must be scum would miss the post literally 9 posts down that comes from town in the same situation (RVS!) making the same sort of joke (Titus is always scum lol) is town trying to think about if they're right or not in any way.
Yup that post is the same fucking game and clearly an RVS joke sheep. Your mirrored scum almost verbatim that I had seen. Scum try to start wagons on me in RVS. Firebringer has that sort of jokey personality. You don't get to match established scum motivation and then try to pidgeonhile posts to fit.
You whine about selective meta, but you don't resemble anything close to an inquisitive nature. Even here, you aren't focused on solving the game but your own survival and to discredit me. That's the sole point of your vote.
Why haven't you interacted with Dwelee regarding the Pistachion wagon at all? You don't care to sort either.
I guaranfuckingtee that Davesto is scum. If he flips town, turbolynch me tomorrow.
In post 734, Titus wrote:Yup that post is the same fucking game and clearly an RVS joke sheep.
And mine... isn't clearly an RVS joke? Considering my known hatred of gambler's fallacy, you think I would be even close to being serious by making a vote on you in what is fairly obviously RVS territory regarding your reputation for often being scum?
Your mirrored scum almost verbatim that I had seen.
I also mirrored town very similarly that you had seen.
Scum try to start wagons on me in RVS.
How I RVS: pick a name from the playerlist I can say something silly about them, or just pick a random name. I find it amusing that you think me happening to choose you has any sort of ulterior motivation.
Firebringer has that sort of jokey personality.
And me, who modded a game called
PUN
Mafia, all about
PUN
s, and who is also known for making
PUN
s and the like isn't? Alright.
You don't get to match established scum motivation and then try to pidgeonhile posts to fit.
I find it amusing that you're describing exactly what you're doing; pigeonholing. You use the example that can paint me as scummy whilst ignoring one that doesn't allow you to paint me as scum - the RVS joke vote on you because "when aren't you scum"/"you're always scum". The fact that you don't even look at it tells me you aren't even trying to consider your thoughts on me - you just want me lynched because I'm an easy target.
You whine about selective meta, but you don't resemble anything close to an inquisitive nature.
"You whine about me doing X, but let me tell you something completely unrelated that you're not doing so you can just forget about my first point".
Even here, you aren't focused on solving the game but your own survival and to discredit me. That's the sole point of your vote.
Damn, you got me. I'm not trying to solve the game by reconsidering my vote on RC and putting it on you for perfectly good reasons, I'm obviously just trying to discredit you by pointing out how your logic is flawed.
Can we also talk about Titus' slight case of backpedalling? How earlier she acted as if my buddying was the biggest factor in me being scum, then not actually showing any buddying from me until after at least 3 or so players bugged her for it, and then when that's called out as not being buddied she acts as if my RVS vote was the biggest reason that I must be scum all along.
Why haven't you interacted with Dwelee regarding the Pistachion wagon at all? You don't care to sort either.
What is there to say? "Someone I don't really have a read on has a scumread on someone I don't really have a read on. I got no read from this." I comment on what I find important, because focusing on what's important massively reduces distracting rubbish like that would end up being. Someone thinks someone else is scum? Why should I care, I've found scum myself!
In post 734, Titus wrote:Yup that post is the same fucking game and clearly an RVS joke sheep.
And mine... isn't clearly an RVS joke? Considering my known hatred of gambler's fallacy, you think I would be even close to being serious by making a vote on you in what is fairly obviously RVS territory regarding your reputation for often being scum?
Your mirrored scum almost verbatim that I had seen.
I also mirrored town very similarly that you had seen.
Scum try to start wagons on me in RVS.
How I RVS: pick a name from the playerlist I can say something silly about them, or just pick a random name. I find it amusing that you think me happening to choose you has any sort of ulterior motivation.
Firebringer has that sort of jokey personality.
And me, who modded a game called
PUN
Mafia, all about
PUN
s, and who is also known for making
PUN
s and the like isn't? Alright.
You don't get to match established scum motivation and then try to pidgeonhile posts to fit.
I find it amusing that you're describing exactly what you're doing; pigeonholing. You use the example that can paint me as scummy whilst ignoring one that doesn't allow you to paint me as scum - the RVS joke vote on you because "when aren't you scum"/"you're always scum". The fact that you don't even look at it tells me you aren't even trying to consider your thoughts on me - you just want me lynched because I'm an easy target.
You whine about selective meta, but you don't resemble anything close to an inquisitive nature.
"You whine about me doing X, but let me tell you something completely unrelated that you're not doing so you can just forget about my first point".
Even here, you aren't focused on solving the game but your own survival and to discredit me. That's the sole point of your vote.
Damn, you got me. I'm not trying to solve the game by reconsidering my vote on RC and putting it on you for perfectly good reasons, I'm obviously just trying to discredit you by pointing out how your logic is flawed.
Can we also talk about Titus' slight case of backpedalling? How earlier she acted as if my buddying was the biggest factor in me being scum, then not actually showing any buddying from me until after at least 3 or so players bugged her for it, and then when that's called out as not being buddied she acts as if my RVS vote was the biggest reason that I must be scum all along.
Why haven't you interacted with Dwelee regarding the Pistachion wagon at all? You don't care to sort either.
What is there to say? "Someone I don't really have a read on has a scumread on someone I don't really have a read on. I got no read from this." I comment on what I find important, because focusing on what's important massively reduces distracting rubbish like that would end up being. Someone thinks someone else is scum? Why should I care, I've found scum myself!
No. You wouldn't jokingly push a gambler's fallacy as town. You didn't closely resemble town. Fire was joking. You tried to make the exact same emphasis in the exact same manner as known scum. Your post wasn't a pun or a joke.
I didn't show the buddying because it was obvious. You're not investigating but just stating everyone is town and minimally having confrontation after being called out.
You're not an easy target at all Dave, that's blatant ate that's not true.
You're not "reconsidering RC" you just moved to the biggest threat against you. You didn't argue RC was town, just that Zi was scum.
I am not backing off on guaranteed scum. We can lynch Pistachio tomorrow. If that doesn't happen because of a cop guilty and you keep me alive, he'll be dead by Day 4.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
If it matches 100% of the time, who cares the size of my ego? If someone makes the same exact post as scum (Mastina 2) with the same exact professed response as scum (BM) with a complete and total departure from his town meta, what more do I need? Of course Dave's frustrated. Scum get frustrated when caught.
#frustrated.
Y'all can keep hunting. Dave is scum. Maybe we get lucky and I will have a pool that has all the scum day one.