In post 88, MattP wrote: In post 87, LucianRoy wrote:This game is giving me Anxiety.
I don't get it Matt, what's your justification on the vote?
I don't like this super rational protown way you're trying to present yourself both in your dissuading Ocean to pursue me and in you trying to get Wisdom to unvote Anxiety on page 2 of the game
Matt, coming from anyone else, I would've called this logic Bs, but I can see that you're a sensible guy, and sensible guys don't vote on account of whim. Especially on players that they're calling protown. Though this is far from the reason I was expecting, I'm actually reading you town for it. But what exactly about my defense/dissuasion/ whatever you want to call it do you find scummy?
I want to see more interaction between Ocean and Matt. I originally thought the meta jab from Ocean was SvT, but now I'm not so sure.
SW burst in here firing questions at Ocean's logic, and I have to say, they've managed to ignore me quite nicely. That makes me kind of sad on the inside, but remember when I asked where the salt for voting Ocean was coming from? I don't need an explanation now.
Ocean, I'll be frank in saying that pre-associative flips, even when a player has still yet to confirm, are pretty bad. I speak from experience.
In post 96, OceanWind wrote:Adding to that is the fact that I do find Lucian scummy. The way he's defending Matt in Post 69 doesn't come across as genuine. Firstly, he didn't even wait for Matt to respond before diving in, and secondly, even if he disagreed with my opinion, that isn't indicative of my alignment.
I didn't need to wait for Matt to respond to find a junky meta analysis scummy. It looked a lot like you were trying to get something out of Matt, (or possibly even posturing a vote over him), and that's what I found scummy. You said you even agreed with me disagreeing with you. That made me do a double take, and left me wondering if you even took yourself seriously.