Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #925 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:57 am

In post 922, Errantparabola wrote:I assume that since I'm buddying ranger, you think ranger is town. So at least you have a few things right.
why did you feel the need to point out that you were voting me 3 days in a row?

You can't seriously be

that

confident about Ranger being town.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #926 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:58 am

Fuck this. I am retracting my slight townread of Errant.

Errantparabola · Post Post #927 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:33 am

I'm not. But Ranger is my top townread. If we are ever going to solve the damn game, then we can't be wishy washy about all of our reads. I'm assuming that ranger is town and working from there.
I have some questions for you in 914, AI.

texcat · Post Post #928 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:39 am

In post 922, Errantparabola wrote:I assume that since I'm buddying ranger, you think ranger is town. So at least you have a few things right.
why did you feel the need to point out that you were voting me 3 days in a row?

No, I'm still leaning scum on Ranger, as I also said earlier. Ranger does not have to be town for you to buddy up with her. It doesn't matter what I think, or even what Ranger actually is. It says something about you, but not much about Ranger for you to be buddying her.

And again, already asked and answered.

In post 897, texcat wrote:
In post 876, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What do we have on Texcat, though?

She seemed to deflect from Wanderer.

An insincere sounding congratulatory post.

Emphasizing consistency, for voting Errant again. Not sure why we need to know.

But how is this a solid case?

Insincere?? I assure you that it was not insincere. I'm not sure why you're characterizing it that way.
I can see how you think I was emphasizing consistency,
but what I was feeling was more like, Please can we lynch Errant already??

In post 877, Ranger wrote: Yes, we have these incriminating interactions in addition to texcat fitting the same posting profile as ABR and Wanderer: focusing only on specific players and not providing much reason behind their pushes, with a low post count.

If that isn't enough for you, then I'm sorry, you need to seriously rethink how you play; it's rock-solid evidence.

"Not providing much reason"? As opposed to you, who provides readlists with no reasons?

Am I the only one who thinks that Errant is just pretending to scum hunt?

Errantparabola · Post Post #929 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:45 am

Try again. Even if you were right, its multiball. Scum dont have to "pretend to scumhunt."
Sorry i keep missing your answers. I'm on my phone.
If you havent explained already, could you ecplain your scumread on Ranger?

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #930 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:05 am

In post 914, Errantparabola wrote:AI, what do you think about my response on your thoughts on my towncase?

Can you be more specific?

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #931 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:10 am

Suppose

that Ranger is town, then Errant may very well be scum.

I don't like the relationship between the two; one scumreading the other, one townreading the other acting like "What's the problem with this situation? I don't understand! Everything is cool!

". The problem is that for some reason one is overly confident of the other, but the other distrusts them. Something is not right here.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #932 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:17 am

If Ranger is scum, and Errant is town, then Errant seems to be irrationally confident about Ranger, who, according to Errant, was quite capable of deceiving them. And now it's almost like it's a fact that they are town. No. I'm not buying this at all.

Errant is scum whether Ranger is scum or not.

UNVOTE: Ranger

VOTE: Errant

Errantparabola · Post Post #933 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:41 am

Fmpov, ranger and i is clearly tvt. Ive responded to all of her arguments. But ive learned that sometimes there's no convincing her. So i decided im not going to clog up the thread begging her to townread me.

AI you NEED to explain your scumread on ranger.
Theres no rhyme or reason to it. Im phoneposting still so i dont want to go back but im fairly certain your case is founded on the early reads. Which i KNOW for a fact is null.

Like i said before, if you're just not going to be confident in all your townreads, then there's no solving the game. Thats why im picking my strongest townread and moving from there. Obviously i dont think ranger is 100% town.

Ai youre town but your logic is pretty bad.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #934 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:43 am

Then Ranger's logic is perhaps bad as well? Or do you believe she has good reasons to distrust you?

Errantparabola · Post Post #935 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:50 am

Ranger's scumcase on me is based on me scumreading her at a time that could be interpreted as opportunistic. Although it's not, it isnt like i can just prove my inner motives. I cant just prove that my scumread on ranger is genuine. You're misinterpreting the whole thing- ranger's scumcase on me is believable but wrong. There's no logical fallacy in it.

hi im Yakko · Post Post #936 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:55 am

I may have lost interest in this game.

Town
AI
Squirrel
Ranger - town because posts are towny :p
Errant
Fire
Zzzzx
Dominator
Texcat
Flubber
Scum

Ranger earlier posts were investigative and still are imo.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #937 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:00 am

Re 827

Ranger looks town here. It's not very pro-scum to make stances on lurkers,especially with town reads

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #938 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:01 am

In post 936, hi im Yakko wrote:I may have lost interest in this game.

Town
AI
Squirrel
Ranger - town because posts are towny :p
Errant
Fire
Zzzzx
Dominator
Texcat
Flubber
Scum

Ranger earlier posts were investigative and still are imo.

Why are you only commenting on Ranger?

Errantparabola · Post Post #939 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:04 am

AI respond to me

Flubbernugget · Post Post #940 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:06 am

In post 891, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 890, Firebringer wrote:
In post 889, AlwaysInnocent wrote:1. I voted for Wanderer before it was cool. So I am not a vampire.
2. I voted for Albert B. before it was cool. So I am not a werewolf.

Neither of these were cool.

I don't see how being at the front of the train makes you confirmed town.
It doesn't, but it makes it more likely. I am confirmed town, though.

We also had a town cop with a guilty on ABR so that was kind of a no brainer.
True, but I voted even before that and called out Albert B, causing him to be annoyed with me (it is hard to fake this).

Given multiball a scum cop isn't out of the question unless I missed a particular of Mr. B's claim. And again these weren't the epitome of scum play you went after

Flubbernugget · Post Post #941 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:07 am

In post 892, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 685, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 683, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 681, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Flubber your 3-pool POE sucks donkey balls.
Now you are just copying me. And I was basically repeating Titus' question.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, some noobie that joined november 2015 can be right on occasion.

In post 706, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Link me to your newbie game I want to make fun of you.

In post 712, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Titus AI is one of your people?

Why don't I like any of them?

You can't fake this shit.

Yes you can

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #942 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:09 am

Flubber, you're not seriously going to argue that he faked it? Please start with plausible scenarios.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #943 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:11 am

It's not that hard to fake anger when you consistently make one line posts

Flubbernugget · Post Post #944 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:12 am

Yakko why am I scum?

I've also missed the case on errant

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #945 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:15 am

In post 943, Flubbernugget wrote:It's not that hard to fake anger when you consistently make one line posts

Where will this bring us? Suppose it is true? Then what?

Firebringer · Post Post #946 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:44 pm

In post 923, Squirrelly wrote:I'm not having a lot of time but I know I explained my scum read on Flubber before and firebringer is essential lurking more then normal for a blitz game.
Plus is you read wander ISO she calls firebringer scum then drops the read quickly with no reason, that's why I see firebringer scum.

I'm null with zzzx, Dom and texcat.
I disagree with AI's scum read on ranger.

Kind of weak reasoning on me, I mean I guess its an association read but it really doesn't make sense.

You want to try explaining why you think Wanderer was dropping the scum read a bit?
You said was for 'no reason' but I can think of a reason she would do it as scum.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #947 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:09 pm

In post 946, Firebringer wrote:You said was for 'no reason' but I can think of a reason she would do it as scum.

Why would she do it?

Firebringer · Post Post #948 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:56 pm

In post 947, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Why would she do it?

Maybe I am misremembering events but I was townreading Wanderer at some point. Or at least pushing against her, was that around when she dropped it?

No idea.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #949 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:00 pm

In post 948, Firebringer wrote:
In post 947, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Why would she do it?

Maybe I am misremembering events but I was townreading Wanderer at some point. Or at least pushing against her, was that around when she dropped it?

No idea.

Either you are townreading her or you are pushing for her lynch...