Well, I sincerely do not appreciate this kind of phrasing. I know it's fine with everybody else, but I personally do not like to use it or for it to be used when addressing me. THANK YOU.
The fact that you're voting Jackal now lifts them up a notch, but doesn't affect you. I said it was YOU who linked Jackal & Starbuck and that there was no direct link between the two, The fact Starbuck flipped WW condemns YOU in a direct way, not Jackal. Now with you voting him he looks a tad better, while you're link with Starbuck stays intact.
The thing is I confess to being EXTREMELY confused by the roleclaims of the day not being alignment conclusive. I thus cannot rely on them to decide, and would still have to rely on other post content, interaction with other players and voting patterns. This is PRECISELY why I picked this role I'm in, btw. I needed to work on my analysis and case composition as opposed to getting info from investigations and roleclaiming. As I said I do NOT have investigative/informative/protective abilities at all, and no active killing abilities either. I specifically locked myself up to force me to THINK and get to conclusions w/o relying on info coming from the mod, and it's a bit confusing but I'm enjoying the ride to be honest, and if I'm still making mistakes I'm content with learning from them.
especially if smith is a town vig
