In post 1091, Almost50 wrote:Dont have to yell . . .
Not yelling. I only bolded bc it's the way to catch your attention, but I DID NOT CAPITALIZE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In post 1091, Almost50 wrote:Dont have to yell . . .
In post 1096, Aneninen wrote:In post 1083, Ranger wrote:You're gonna have to explain that to me. I see Titus saying she'll analyze your wagon. That applies regardless of your alignment. If you were to flip scum (you won't, I can tell that much), then the wagon would be useful, especially for finding town. If you were to flip town (you will), then the wagon is still useful, for finding scum in particular.And that's what I think was a scumslip.
It sounds as if you know that I'll flip town.
Firstly, I don't think they'd have pointed it out that they'd VCA my wagon later if they scumread me for real.
Secondly, their reaction. Check out their 1069 once more. They did NOT care about my post (actually nor my content at all) – that post had one single goal: discrediting me. [1]
In post 1086, Almost50 wrote:#Anen: I take it back.
I don't think Ranger was affected my post as for her reads.
Also, why are you so worried? It's clear that lynching you would be a terrible idea right now. (We'll see later whether your claim is real and if so, you need not worry.)
In post 1092, Burning Crystal wrote:
They won't be coming soon, all Aneninen has done is quotewall to make it look like he's more active and involved than he really is.
I can't believe people are following his crappy votes with even worse votes and none of it seems to deserve any attention or notice whatsoever?
More discrediting. I'm not surprised.
Also, calling everyone voting for you terrible is another scumtell. Firstly, I don't think my posts are the only reasons for voting for you. Secondly, you're totally ignoring the fact that you were wagoned Yesterday. [2]
In post 1092, Burning Crystal wrote:
Naked votes don't fly outside of RVS, guys, so why don't you try doing something original instead of following scum around like a bunch of brain-dead pidgeons?
VOTE: Aneninen
Good. You started insulting me. It works on many players, I know, but no, you won't make me upset. You're attacking the player instead of the posts, which is scummy.
You're acting as if the votes for you had been RVS-es. Palpable misrepresentation of the events.
And one more thing. Repeating the vote. It makes my wagon look bigger than it really is. I know that trick. [3]
In post 1092, Burning Crystal wrote:
In post 1081, Aneninen wrote:Good finding, KainThraddash!
I bet if I asked about the jump from BurningCrystal on me after that post, I'd be discredited once more.
And I bet that if you posted relevant content instead of a bunch of assumptive statements with no corroborating evidence, people that matter might actually believe you. Unfortunately, this is something you not only seem to not possess, but a concept you appear to not understand.
More discrediting. More insults. As if I hadn't posted anything relevant. [4]
In post 1095, chilledtea wrote:Why would scum roleclaim midway through day 1 with no pressure whatsoever? An unnecessary gambit. His "fake-claim" actually would be extremely courageous at that point.
Most of those players claimed because of being pressurized.
This is dependent on the player. There's not a universal answer. The question isn't why scum would roleclaim, it's why Almost50 would roleclaim under no pressure. The answer is because that's what he'd do.chilledtea wrote:Why would scum roleclaim midway through day 1 with no pressure whatsoever?
Being the first vote doesn't matter. Someone having been previously widely townread also doesn't matter if momentum has begun to shift onto them. That's what I've seen from your votes.acryon wrote:How is being the first person to start the wagon on someone who is fairly widely town-read opportunistic?
In post 1104, Ranger wrote:This is dependent on the player. There's not a universal answer. The question isn't why scum would roleclaim, it's why Almost50 would roleclaim under no pressure. The answer is because that's what he'd do.chilledtea wrote:Why would scum roleclaim midway through day 1 with no pressure whatsoever?
Being the first vote doesn't matter. Someone having been previously widely townread also doesn't matter if momentum has begun to shift onto them. That's what I've seen from your votes.acryon wrote:How is being the first person to start the wagon on someone who is fairly widely town-read opportunistic?
In post 1103, Burning Crystal wrote:1: Oh really, and what is your source for this claim? Or are you just flinging shit to see what sticks?
In post 1103, Burning Crystal wrote:2: I didn't call them all terrible, I told them to provide reasoning for being on the wagon. Something I should have done yesterday when our wagon started up in the first place.
In post 1103, Burning Crystal wrote:3: Posts that contain a vote tag and nothing else are baseless votes, regardless of what you say. I didn't realize Titus snuck in a vote against you. Believe me, with how much you've been deflecting and not answering questions we won't need silly tricks like that to see this wagon through.
In post 1103, Burning Crystal wrote:4: For someone so defensive over his supposed contributions, you sure are hesitant to point out what those contributions actually are.
In post 1104, Ranger wrote:This is dependent on the player. There's not a universal answer. The question isn't why scum would roleclaim, it's why Almost50 would roleclaim under no pressure. The answer is because that's what he'd do.chilledtea wrote:Why would scum roleclaim midway through day 1 with no pressure whatsoever?
In post 1105, acryon wrote:How has momentum begun to shift on them without any votes? I imagine if this was a scenario where there were lots of votes on them, you would say I was being opportunistic and sheeping. But since there haven't really been, I am opportunistic and following the " sentiment momentum" (does that sound right?)? Seems like you would come up with whatever to support your narrative. Also if you actually looked at all my votes you'd see they don't even follow the picture you're trying to paint.
In post 1106, Aneninen wrote:
In post 1105, acryon wrote:How has momentum begun to shift on them without any votes? I imagine if this was a scenario where there were lots of votes on them, you would say I was being opportunistic and sheeping. But since there haven't really been, I am opportunistic and following the " sentiment momentum" (does that sound right?)? Seems like you would come up with whatever to support your narrative. Also if you actually looked at all my votes you'd see they don't even follow the picture you're trying to paint.
Erm... I actually posted why I think you're scum. 946. It was not only about your votes. Nothing you've done since then looked town.
In post 1109, Aneninen wrote:Oh I'm terribly sorry that I've forgotten that in this game, I'm not a player who is worth talking TO; I'm the player who is only worth talking AT.
In post 1111, Aneninen wrote:It sounded as if you thought the only reason for scumreading you had been your vote pattern. I corrected that fact.
In post 1076, davesaz wrote:
Furthermore it's a heavy work week, I'm hosting some big meetings.
LA Wed-Fri
In post 1117, Mad King Ashnard wrote:What can I say?
Still want BC dead, don't really feel the anen wagon. Honestly still reeling from the texcat flip, ordinarily I'd talk with RC though I haven't seen him on skype for like a week now. Could also settle for kop at this point.
In post 1117, Mad King Ashnard wrote:What can I say?
Still want BC dead, don't really feel the anen wagon. Honestly still reeling from the texcat flip, ordinarily I'd talk with RC though I haven't seen him on skype for like a week now. Could also settle for kop at this point.