In post 123, Killthestory wrote:87 sucks dick
Come on dude, really. Act mature.
In post 129, duppin wrote:Um, you're pretty aggressive this game KTS.
In post 130, Killthestory wrote:In post 129, duppin wrote:Um, you're pretty aggressive this game KTS.
you better not be implying what i think youre implying
no you have not seen my scum game lol. like ive gotten warnings for it. its probably changed by now but yeah, i have problems with it LOL
In post 127, duppin wrote:That's very interesting. Keeping your options open, huh?
In post 128, Killthestory wrote:his post is wrong. scum and town dont have linear mindsets when they play.
i play aggressive as scum. i play more passive as town. i know plenty of others who do the same. linear thinking in mafia leads to ultimate demise.
In post 130, Killthestory wrote:In post 129, duppin wrote:Um, you're pretty aggressive this game KTS.
you better not be implying what i think youre implying
no you have not seen my scum game lol. like ive gotten warnings for it. its probably changed by now but yeah, i have problems with it LOL
In post 135, Rhaegar wrote:@DUPIN
Well, its good to know what you actually think : ). You should do that more often.
I'm defending shotty because I've played with him at least 5-6 times before, if not more. I've seen him lynched day 1 as town too many damn times to fall for that. And in all fairness, I've been guilty of getting him lynched day 1 a couple of those times. It's a lesson I've learned, and I have no interest in making the same mistake again. It's an easy wagon for scum to push, which is why I think there is scum on it.
Because of his playstyle he is a hard player to accurately read, which is why I reserve the right to do that at a later point. I concede that he could be scum, but I contend that his general behavior and attitude so far fits with both his town and scum play and therefor isn't useful in getting a read on him.
In post 137, pisskop wrote:nonsense. ill be reading you based on motivation andpersonality, not stale meta and reputation
In post 126, Killthestory wrote:ironic. youre mad about a cuss word that doesnt really effect shit. real mature on your end too my dude
In post 128, Killthestory wrote:his post is wrong. scum and town dont have linear mindsets when they play.
i play aggressive as scum. i play more passive as town. i know plenty of others who do the same. linear thinking in mafia leads to ultimate demise.
In post 139, Killthestory wrote:Snarky is scum. He sheeps me and blatantly buddies me, but then he gut reads me as scum as soon as I start disagreeing with him? Yeah right.
In post 144, pistachi0n wrote:In post 139, Killthestory wrote:Snarky is scum. He sheeps me and blatantly buddies me, but then he gut reads me as scum as soon as I start disagreeing with him? Yeah right.
This is a stretch. The sheeping and buddying you refer to were in RVS.
In post 143, Killthestory wrote:Once again, I've been banned for my scum play before, so yes, I'd consider this more passive than my scum play. Also, looking at my past games, I'm not any more aggressive than any of them where I was confirmed to be town. This essentially nullifies your vote since if I'm playing normal as my other town games, wouldn't that mean that I wasn't playing as aggressively as my scumgame?
In post 143, Killthestory wrote:Once again, I've been banned for my scum play before, so yes, I'd consider this more passive than my scum play. Also, looking at my past games, I'm not any more aggressive than any of them where I was confirmed to be town. This essentially nullifies your vote since if I'm playing normal as my other town games, wouldn't that mean that I wasn't playing as aggressively as my scumgame?