In post 772, chilledtea wrote:In post 770, Garmr wrote:In post 769, chilledtea wrote:My top two would be garmr, texcat. The third one isn't very strong - but if needed lowell.
Can I ask why you think I am scum and it better not be because I voted you.
You nitpicked my playstyle. If I don't ask more questions to texcat I am scum.
I absolutely cannot see that as reasonable from any angle. The discussion that was going on had something to do with the fact that texcat voted Madonna while giving similar reasons to Sakura on day 1. I found it fishy and decided to start the day with the vote on her. The situation reached a stalemate because she said she didn't notice Sakura Hana's reasons earlier on during day 1 and only saw it when she was going through Madonna's ISO. There was no way to verify this, so I stopped and decided to focus my attention to lowell. One of the ways I do it is by using my vote - anyone at that point using an argument that I was jumping wagons is a very big scumspect in my eyes. While I don't think you did that, texcat did.
Your argument that the only reason I could have removed my vote from texcat at the very early start of day 2 is because I town read her is wrong. It wasn't just a simple unvote - it was a transfer of vote to lowell.
By the way, I am pretty sure that among the few people who did try to engage lowell today, I was one of them.
Your vote hasn't got much to do with this.
You nitpicked my playstyle. If I don't ask more questions to texcat I am scum.
I pointed out scum motive in your actions and couldn't find possible town reason in it thus not nitpicking your game style.
I absolutely cannot see that as reasonable from any angle. The discussion that was going on had something to do with the fact that texcat voted Madonna while giving similar reasons to Sakura on day 1. I found it fishy and decided to start the day with the vote on her. The situation reached a stalemate because she said she didn't notice Sakura Hana's reasons earlier on during day 1 and only saw it when she was going through Madonna's ISO. There was no way to verify this, so I stopped and decided to focus my attention to lowell. One of the ways I do it is by using my vote - anyone at that point using an argument that I was jumping wagons is a very big scumspect in my eyes. While I don't think you did that, texcat did.
I don't think you get the point. No one arguing you are scum because you jump wagons (well I'm not). Look from a outsiders point of view who has no information.
Person A: shift unvotes a scum read to go to a null read
Person B:asks why you did that
Person A: responds because I want to vote park on person d and person c was defending herself.
Person B: assume that arguing is taken as a town point by person B.
Person C: Says she finds Person A unvote suss and wants to interragote person A a little
Person A shifts vote to person C again in a omgussy reaction.
I am person B and that's how saw events play out. If you were a outsider How would you see this?
Your argument that the only reason I could have removed my vote from texcat at the very early start of day 2 is because I town read her is wrong. It wasn't just a simple unvote - it was a transfer of vote to lowell.
But there's more to my reasoning than just that it was the language and your behavior. Also earlier you said that texcat became null but this implies you were still scum reading texcat. It seems really inconsistent with other explanations.
By the way, I am pretty sure that among the few people who did try to engage lowell today, I was one of them.
Your vote hasn't got much to do with this.
Yeh it hasn't got much about how much you engaged with lowell.