In post 391, Wisdom wrote:
So basically, because you can't see Jake is scum, whoever does see it is scum.
And yet you're expecting people to see farmer as scum just because you do.
Same thing. Just because farmer is scum to you doesn't mean that he is to everyone.
In post 514, Wisdom wrote:I don't care about Dier, Jake is still scum. You had your mislynch, now we're lynching Jake.
Oh, yeah, let's push another potential mislynch
In post 562, Wisdom wrote:And what are you talking about? Did someone I scumread flip town?
Not yet, but they might.
In post 578, Wisdom wrote:Have they flipped, Jeanne? Has anyone I've scumread flip town?
Read above
It's a fact because I say so, hooray for omnipotent me!
In post 626, Wisdom wrote:Who the fuck cares about convincing anyone? Snarky sees scum Maestro and votes scum Maestro. You keep impeding progress because you disagree with how townies choose to play.
In post 648, Wisdom wrote:Yeah, because I'm the only player in this game and my word is law.
Why are you not trying to get your scumreads lynched?
Yeah, you obviously think your word is law and snap at anyone who refuses to see what you see.
In post 765, Wisdom wrote:Jeanne you're still doing the thing where you think the only things in my mind are the things that are in my posts
What else would I think? I can't read your mind, you know
Discrediting
In post 783, Wisdom wrote:Jeanne, I don't give a damn about your situations. I've tried making you see the light. You don't want to. Keep voting me. I don't care.
More discrediting
In post 805, Wisdom wrote:I never said I'm perfect or infallible, you're just incapable of understanding how I play even though I unnecessarily explained it to you.
You say you aren't, yet you demand people sheep you cos your opinion is the only right one
In post 806, Wisdom wrote:And I'll repeat once more that nobody I'm scumreading has flipped town so your point continues being awful
In post 809, Wisdom wrote:No, I never said I was never wrong in my reads, I said what I just said, that nobody I am scumreading in this game has flipped town like you're claiming. I, like every other player, am sometimes right and sometimes wrong.
Yeah, and you're always right so not doing as you say is a sin
In post 815, Wisdom wrote:For the last time.
I am nowhere saying that I am some infallible god of scumhunting that is never wrong. In ASOIAF I was not just wrong about massive, I was also wrong about Radja, Drixx and ABR. In every game there will be at least one townie I will wrongly scumread. It's normal. Hell, in my wiki I say that most of the time my tunneling is on town.
So no. You have misunderstood if you think that what I am saying is that I am always right. I am not always right. What I keep telling you is that your argument does not make sense. You are arguing that when X is scumreading Y, Y flips town, and X continues being arrogant like nothing happened, then X is likely scum. Which is a good point, not always of course as there ARE such arrogant townies, but it's a valid point. However, I keep telling you that I can't be likened to X in this theory, because none of my scumreads THIS GAME have flipped town. If either Jake or farmer flipped town and I continued insisting that everyone should follow me, then you would be able to make this point, but not now.
Do you get it now? If not, too bad, because this is the last time I am trying. I am trying to have extra and extra patience with you but I can only have so much patience.
So when farmer flips town I'm allowed to scumread you without you throwing a fuss?
In post 820, Wisdom wrote: In post 818, Jeanne11 wrote:I asked you multiple times what will you do if they flip town. You never gave a straight answer and think I am annoying for even suggesting that they could flip town.
Yes, because it serves no purpose to ask me what I will do if they flip town. Regardless of my alignment, there is only one correct answer to this, which is "I will reread and reevaluate". You gain nothing by asking me this.
The right answer is to not lynch them without re-evaluating. You re-evaluate before the lynch, not after.
In post 881, Wisdom wrote:Nope, players are judged by their motivation for doing things. Playstyle is playstyle.
You say you're not always right, yet you insist you actually are here
c
This is what you're trying to do from my point of view. The fact that you're jumping from scumread to scumread like a frog further makes me think you're trying to jump at everyone who looks scummy and justify yourself with that after they flip town.
In post 1142, Wisdom wrote:See, Masquerade? Good luck playing this game with people like the above posting. I am now supposed to treat this one-dimensional bullheadness as town.
Pot, meet kettle
In post 1143, Wisdom wrote: In post 1141, Jake from State Farm wrote: In post 1139, Wisdom wrote:Normal games are a great place to find who you shouldn't play with. A great lesson.
Yes and most people have come to the conclusion you are a cancer and should be avoided at all cost.
Go hide under your hole. I am the only one actually trying in this game.
You insult people who dare to question your perfect reads.
In post 1157, Wisdom wrote: In post 1155, Jake from State Farm wrote:I disagree with you. I don't need to do anything more than I have already done. I've found 2 scum and I'm trying to get them lynched. I provide reasons for my scum reads and I keep pressure on them.
I'm #winning
That's not how you play town. You reevaluate. You consider the possibility you're wrong. You consider how others are reacting towards your scumreads. You don't just ignore the game and lurk until your scumreads are dead.
Says this now, but isn't trying to reevaluate at all
In post 1293, Wisdom wrote:This is the guy you're allowing to live. A guy arguing that Snarky's "I want Maestro to claim" somehow holds scum motivation.
Half the players on mafiascum say otherwise based on games I've completed
In post 1294, Wisdom wrote:Like, you have to be completely dumb and shallow (and unfortunately there are at least two such townies in here) in order to look at that and say "okay yes, scum benefit from claims, so that held scum motivation"
read above
In post 1368, Wisdom wrote:Fuck this town. I'll lurk until you either lynch farmer or mislynch whoever
Oh, that's rich. Pure gold. You're lurking until your scumread is dead despite saying that town shouldn't do so earlier. I found me a scum, people.
In post 1409, Wisdom wrote: In post 1403, Jeanne11 wrote:@Wisdom Yeah, right, and when he flips town you will come up with bs excuses as to why you lynched him. If you are scum, you'd sweet-talk your way out and I am not gonna let you.
You have said that for my push on Maestro, my push on Jake, my push on Snarky.
Is nobody scum in this game?
No, you're scum. I've explained why in this post.
In post 1421, Wisdom wrote:There is nothing "proven", Jake, there lies your mistake. Even if someone posted "I am scum" it wouldn't be proof they are scum. There is no proof in mafia besides results from roles.
I already explained the town motivation I see from Snarky. You pressured him about his farmer read. He had forgotten why he had the town read in D1. So he simply said what he assumed probably happened, that he sheeped a townread. That looks like it wasn't the case, but oh well; it isn't a lie with the intent to look town, it's a lie that comes from not remembering.
You don't go so deeply though, you just look at the lie and say "This is a lie, scum lie, Snarky is scum, period." It isn't that simple.
In post 1426, Wisdom wrote: In post 1423, Jake from State Farm wrote:so you are saying that a town aligned player who didn't remember something would make up stuff instead of just admitting he didn't remember?
yes
Once again, things are not absolute. Town can even claim scum and still be town.
In post 1434, Wisdom wrote:Town are people, not machines. There are no preset behaviors you can use to define town. Town will lie, will fakeclaim guilties for no reason other than stubbornness, will claim scum for no reason other than personal amusement, will behave in abnormal and weird ways affected by paranoia and lack of knowledge, and will generally RARELY act the way you believe is the optimal way they should be behaving.
The answer to such behaviors is not "you're not playing like I expect town to, so I will lynch you and if you are town I will report you for not playing like town".
The answer is to widen your expectations and go deeper to understand the motivations behind such behaviors.
Says people shouldn't be one-dimensional. Is one-dimensional himself. Okay then....
In post 1436, Wisdom wrote:I am doing it, and I have deemed he is scum.
I also did it with Jake, Maestro and Snarky, and I deemed I wasn't sure they were scum. Hence why I am not pushing them anymore. But you're still failing to give that to me.
In post 1448, Wisdom wrote:Go on, have your mislynch. Let's see how you'll defend yourself for this when farmer has flipped scum.
Get rid of yours first.