1.
366 - Votes me with the following reason: "I have read nothing and everything at the same time. Ircher seems most scum atm so I'll go with him for now" -
First of all, that first part makes zero sense. Second of all, we (the thread) were just talking about how the Ircher wagon was bound to attract lazy, opportunistic votes from scum, and look at who fell for it: Cy. Unlike some of the other votes, the reasoning here is "Ircher is the biggest wagon and therefore scum." I don't care about stupid join dates; that's a lousy reason for a vote and even for newbies, that seems more like a stretch that scum make than town. Not to mention, the vote feels very forced. -
Very Scummy (-4)
2.
422 - PR Soft-Claim ("I'll be of more use later") and literally states he's gonna do nothing and simply watch where votes go. Not to mention the AtE. -
First of all, the soft-claim is #1) Super unnecessary and #2) Probably fake. Furthermore, you basicalky just said "Let me lurk, and I'll vote whichever wagon has the most votes." You don't want to make your own reads, and you aren't even sheeping other people's reads. You're just joining the biggest wagon, the one you think is most likely to carry through at this time. This is scum motivation; town would make some kind of attempt to scumhunt rather than literally make up bogus reasons to be lazy on purpose. -
Very Scummy (-4)
3.
425 - Again, waiting for someone more scummy to vote (since he's now the top wagon). His pedit actually states internet issues..... -
First of all, if you truly are town with connection issues, would it not make more sense to state so immediately rather than cast a lazy vote and try to justify uselessness? Scum on the other hand would use it as the perfect excuse to do nothing which is exactly what you are doing. Second of all, I dislike your wording here; rather than helping out, etc., you're just waiting on someone else to be the focus attn and then you MIGHT (Translation: Not) actually do something useful (Translation: Actually scumhunt rather than join the biggest wagon.) -
Very Scummy (-4)
4.
544 - States he thinks I'm scum and that the wagon is bad cuz it's on a lazy persion rather than who he "thinks" may be scum -
I haven't seen you provide a single reason or quote a specific reason from someone else that makes you think I'm scum. You know what that tells me? You're scum without an actually read on me who is just looking for the easiest target. Secomd of all, you imply that lazy people are not scum. Sure, Lazy != Scum, but laziness in general is NAI. And, if you are lazy, expect a wagon to form, as scum have more incentive than town to be lazy and/or lurk. -
Scum (-3)
5.
615 - States I'm still scum, but Copper moreso. -
1) That's still a lazy post 2) While I'm still the top wagon, I see your sudden shift. As the counterwagon, you don't want to have to defend yourself when I flip town, so you try to distance yourself from your scumread. Copper was a good target, cuz people were beginning to shift their attn to him. -
Scum (-3)
6.
1276 - Titus vote -
The reasoning here was also lazy and sucked. Not to mention, you never got to ISOing Titus; you only voted because Titus was a smaller wagon but had a lot people suspecting her. I bet someone is scumchat told you to switch targets (From voting the biggest wagon to voting a quieter wagon). -
Scummy (-2)
7.
1418 - Switches vote to Brawl -
Ofc, cuz Brawl was 1) Town 2) Looked very lynchable and 3) Was the biggest wagon, so ofc you swotch there, esp. after being told a Titus lynch is bad. -
Scum (-3)
8.
2020 - "More or less, but I don't mind getting on a wagon for him." a
Classic wagon distancing. "Oh yes, I do think xyz is scum but I don't want to be on the wagon cuz then attn is on me. If this was genuine unsureness in the wagon, it would be more evident. -
Very Scummy (-4)
9.
2504 - Finally taking the game seriously (Not) and quotes NKA as reason (Titus is leader and wasn't killed; therefore scum) -
Lousy reasoning first of all, but I guess newbie in some way. Nonetheless, that's not a good reason by itself to be trying to lynch a player not to mention you ought to have more detailed reasons by now than that. -
Scummy (-2)
10.
3374 - Literally asks "What do you want specifically" when asked for more -
You got to be trolling at this point. It's quite obvious more content and well-developed reads are wanted. And regardless, your question is 1) A prod dodge and 2) Serves absolutely no purpose. Actually try to be useful for once pls. -
Very Scummy (-4)
11. I already explained why 3437 and 3439 are bad.