In post 1492, texcat wrote:Although a bunch of people wanted to kill him on D1 before the push on Ira.
In post 1493, Zachstralkita wrote:Tru but I was one of the wholehearted advocates of NOT doing that.
Huh? Can you explain what changed your mind?
In post 1492, texcat wrote:Although a bunch of people wanted to kill him on D1 before the push on Ira.
In post 1493, Zachstralkita wrote:Tru but I was one of the wholehearted advocates of NOT doing that.
Huh? Can you explain what changed your mind?
In post 1525, texcat wrote:In post 1492, texcat wrote:Although a bunch of people wanted to kill him on D1 before the push on Ira.In post 1493, Zachstralkita wrote:Tru but I was one of the wholehearted advocates of NOT doing that.Huh? Can you explain what changed your mind?
In post 1527, Zachstralkita wrote:
oh i thought you were referring to LQ with that conversation
if you look at my day 1 I wanted to kill a plain farmer but I switched to Ranger
NOW I AM BACK
Let me be clear: I would be blacklisting Ranger if they turn out to be Town and pre assigning a Scum read on me without looking at anything I do.
Jesus not explaining a read as reason for a blacklist manIn post 1532, LicketyQuickety wrote:Let me be clear: I would be blacklisting Ranger if they turn out to be Town and pre assigning a Scum read on me without looking at anything I do.
I actually like this defence.In post 1497, Ranger wrote:Pretty sure this is a logical fallacy. Forget the name of it though.Umlaut wrote:Because if you know you're town, and you are actually behaving the way I say you are, then that behavior is ipso facto townish from your perspective, so it's kind of dumb to suspect me for calling it townish when it actually is.
And I have gone on record to say I would NEVER, EVER choose investigation immune over bulletproof as a serial killer. Because, you know...I'mTitus wrote:She can only be gf, SK, or town.Ranger. I tend to get nightkilled a lot...even as scum. So, not a serial killer, aside from the obvious lack of second nightkill. Also, one reason I love this setup? It is very much easily broken with simple logistics. We know there's an absolute maximum of 5-Ts, so the only possible iterations where I'd be a Godfather are {0 T, 1 T, 2 T, 5 T}. Of those, half have a serial killer. A lack of second nightkill indicates a lack of one. Leaving the only possible setups where I'd be a Godfather as {0 T, 2 T}. Time will tell with those, as will time tell with a lack of a serial killer. (Which is an assumption at this point.)
Of course, strictly speaking, objectively, there's the option I'd be scum with Titus, but in that case, lynch Titus first. Regardless, that pretty much tells you that I'm town. Titus is town. So lynch scum.
Really? I think it looks more like IIoA.In post 1536, Bins wrote:I actually like this defence.In post 1497, Ranger wrote:Pretty sure this is a logical fallacy. Forget the name of it though.Umlaut wrote:Because if you know you're town, and you are actually behaving the way I say you are, then that behavior is ipso facto townish from your perspective, so it's kind of dumb to suspect me for calling it townish when it actually is.
And I have gone on record to say I would NEVER, EVER choose investigation immune over bulletproof as a serial killer. Because, you know...I'mTitus wrote:She can only be gf, SK, or town.Ranger. I tend to get nightkilled a lot...even as scum. So, not a serial killer, aside from the obvious lack of second nightkill. Also, one reason I love this setup? It is very much easily broken with simple logistics. We know there's an absolute maximum of 5-Ts, so the only possible iterations where I'd be a Godfather are {0 T, 1 T, 2 T, 5 T}. Of those, half have a serial killer. A lack of second nightkill indicates a lack of one. Leaving the only possible setups where I'd be a Godfather as {0 T, 2 T}. Time will tell with those, as will time tell with a lack of a serial killer. (Which is an assumption at this point.)
Of course, strictly speaking, objectively, there's the option I'd be scum with Titus, but in that case, lynch Titus first. Regardless, that pretty much tells you that I'm town. Titus is town. So lynch scum.
I have more reason for blacklisting Ranger than just that they won't explain their read on me. Feel free to ISO my sitewide posts and you might just get it. There are stipulations to it, if Ranger is Scum, then there's no reason to blacklist her, if she's Town, I have no inclination that she is ever going to stop Scum reading me right off the bat and making baseless pushes on me in every game we play in, so, yeah.In post 1535, Bins wrote:
If you are town man you're gonna realize that not having a case isn't scummy and having a case doesn't clear you. Like you've made cases and had reasons but they've been shit sooooooo... what's really better here? Gut is a valid reason. Tone is a valid reason. I feel for Ranger at this point even tho she isn't clear.
UNVOTE:
Looking at Tex tomorrow
VOTE: RCIn post 1537, RadiantCowbells wrote:Transcend/Smither still makes sense without LQ ftr.
Just putting that out there in case this doesn't go well today.
What's this about?In post 1541, Titus wrote:Why do you have to be scum in our last game together?
I suppose that's how I've looked so far, but gut has informed all of my prior reads as well even when they were also based on other things. Right now I feel like my texcat scumread is simply stronger than any of my others.In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:You have played a fairly analysis heavy game up to this point. Why the gut read now?
Are you thinking it's not going to go well today?In post 1537, RadiantCowbells wrote:Transcend/Smither still makes sense without LQ ftr.
Just putting that out there in case this doesn't go well today.
This looks like a load of crap.In post 1543, a plain farmer wrote:I suppose that's how I've looked so far, but gut has informed all of my prior reads as well even when they were also based on other things. Right now I feel like my texcat scumread is simply stronger than any of my others.In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:You have played a fairly analysis heavy game up to this point. Why the gut read now?
Vote himtexcat wrote:This looks like a load of crap.In post 1543, a plain farmer wrote:I suppose that's how I've looked so far, but gut has informed all of my prior reads as well even when they were also based on other things. Right now I feel like my texcat scumread is simply stronger than any of my others.In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:You have played a fairly analysis heavy game up to this point. Why the gut read now?
Indeed.In post 1546, Zachstralkita wrote:Vote himtexcat wrote:This looks like a load of crap.In post 1543, a plain farmer wrote:I suppose that's how I've looked so far, but gut has informed all of my prior reads as well even when they were also based on other things. Right now I feel like my texcat scumread is simply stronger than any of my others.In post 1518, LicketyQuickety wrote:You have played a fairly analysis heavy game up to this point. Why the gut read now?