Not reallyIn post 147, Rosske wrote:She's hiding more then I am
You kinda dug you're own grave anyways
Not reallyIn post 147, Rosske wrote:She's hiding more then I am
Give me one clean reason for your vote on me and I'll drop this entirely. Most likely you'll give another empty one-liner that does nothing to assist the town but go ahead and prove me wrong. You've yet to make one post with substance this whole game. Fluff fluff fluff fluff fluff. One liner. More fluff.In post 150, thenewearth wrote:Not reallyIn post 147, Rosske wrote:She's hiding more then I am
You kinda dug you're own grave anyways
whats the case on rb?In post 152, GuiltyLion wrote:rb might be scum
[citation needed]In post 156, rb wrote:I actually think Rosske is more likely Town than Scum at this point because he's trying to solve the game and push players into effective play
Do you see scum motivation in posts 146 147 and 151 of Rosske?In post 158, GuiltyLion wrote:also while I appreciate RachMarie explaining my thought process for me (please don't do that again), I especially didn't like the timing of rb's wagon hop. It's like he was waiting for Rosske to post something perfunctory, such that it would give him a reason to move.
Fixed.In post 161, rb wrote:I like how I just tell you 3 posts and you're like, "quote your evidence."
Now read TNE's ISO and you'll see Rosske's correct in his analysis.Rosske wrote:Give me one clean reason for your vote on me and I'll drop this entirely. Most likely you'll give another empty one-liner that does nothing to assist the town but go ahead and prove me wrong. You've yet to make one post with substance this whole game. Fluff fluff fluff fluff fluff. One liner. More fluff.
Sux. Get better!In post 164, thenewearth wrote:@Mod: V/LA indefinite amount of time
Just got my tooth extracted and my head hurts like a bitch
i'm actually genuinely curious what you think about those on your wagon. if you are town, who is the most suspicious proponent of your wagon?In post 146, Rosske wrote:It's best for me to be quiet if I'm at L-1 this early in the game. I'm watching the people on my wagon and I don't want to make too much noise cause interference. I think it's pretty obvious here that the wagon on me isn't because I'm scum, there's other things going on, and I'm chilling to see how it develops. I guarantee you that all four people on my wagon DO NOT have a conductive reason for voting and that's where things'll get interesting.
I like this reaction slightly.In post 106, GuiltyLion wrote:Yes, I meant it as "I'll allow him to be town in my eyes for now", but I didn't consider that it was ambiguous so that's not a bad point.
I'd bet on it because the idea that scum!karnos would use an L-1 vote as a hope for a town derphammer just feels shallow to me. It's the kind of surface level push that's easy to fake. IMO there's nothing alignment indicative in putting someone at L-1 early, if anything I'd say it's slightly townie as it forces people to start getting their teeth in the game.
What's NAI? can't find it in the common abbreviation page.In post 108, rb wrote:The point is that derphammer is NAI. Time to move on.
This is very likely IMO.In post 126, thenewearth wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and say rach is town
Probably
Could be wrong
But town
Why are you misreping the argument against you?In post 138, karnos wrote:you can't just cripple your play and never put anyone at L-1 just because something bad might happen.
In post 161, rb wrote:I like how I just tell you 3 posts and you're like, "quote your evidence."
Now read TNE's ISO and you'll see Rosske's correct in his analysis.Rosske wrote:Give me one clean reason for your vote on me and I'll drop this entirely. Most likely you'll give another empty one-liner that does nothing to assist the town but go ahead and prove me wrong. You've yet to make one post with substance this whole game. Fluff fluff fluff fluff fluff. One liner. More fluff.