In post 651, Shinobi wrote:I'm beginning to think that both Bins and farside are scum.
I've had this nagging feeling that Bins has kind of been talking about nothing, IE her posts about me/majiffy unvoting and voting which seemed somewhat superficial. Her vote on Dunn (which came for what I'm assuming is a nonexistent reason) doesn't help matters at all and her whole thought process seems relatively disjointed.
Farside's read flip on Io seemed to come at a really unnatural time. She had started pushing Io so long ago and only very recently started looking into her meta way,
way
after the fact once nobody jumped on the wagon on her. (Not to mention the switch came after she found a new wagon and the meta case she came up with is nowhere to be found. What changed? It's a mystery.)
I still think Majiffy is a reliable third so I'm keeping my vote there. Otherwise, that's where I currently stand.
I kinda agree with your argument on Bins. Farside? Could it be possible that she's playing with feeling? I mean, if Farside is playing with feeling, then bias is going to be a factor and the biggest bias is going to be recent events.
Example:
->Io was completely out of radar until I mentioned about him @
318. When I talked about Io, he starts talking about Io.
->When Lane throws about Shinobi, he starts voting you, maybe swayed by Lane's argument.
If this feels weird, think about supporter of Donald Trump. Most Donalud Trump voter are emotional voter. "OMG, there's a radical islam attack at Nice" *silently moves from Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump*
"The debate on whether short multi postings or a long wall of post is good or not is like a debate on gun control--we would never understand each other and we have to make peace with it." -Realeo
I'm mabye a serious player, but I'm capable of joke. Ok?