You're arguing over whether he was actually thinking about his stuff in depth or trying to appear busyIn post 647, lane0168 wrote:Show me 2 posts of him analyzing anything. It should be easy to find something that isn't majiffy or alpaca being lackluster. Some real super analyzing. There isn't any
Lmao. You know what I mean.In post 649, lane0168 wrote:Can I not spam one question?... Uh... Yes? I've not spammed all of my questions but one. Can you not ask stupid questions?In post 646, cytheflyguy wrote:Can you not spam one question please? @Lane
In post 642, lane0168 wrote:
This is the one quesion and I'd appriciate it if you'd stop please.In post 643, lane0168 wrote:In post 642, lane0168 wrote:
If you don't even hazard a guess, why do I need to answer?In post 634, lane0168 wrote:Nevermind don't answer, I pendant wouldn't understand anyways
I kinda agree with your argument on Bins. Farside? Could it be possible that she's playing with feeling? I mean, if Farside is playing with feeling, then bias is going to be a factor and the biggest bias is going to be recent events.In post 651, Shinobi wrote:I'm beginning to think that both Bins and farside are scum.
I've had this nagging feeling that Bins has kind of been talking about nothing, IE her posts about me/majiffy unvoting and voting which seemed somewhat superficial. Her vote on Dunn (which came for what I'm assuming is a nonexistent reason) doesn't help matters at all and her whole thought process seems relatively disjointed.
Farside's read flip on Io seemed to come at a really unnatural time. She had started pushing Io so long ago and only very recently started looking into her meta way,wayafter the fact once nobody jumped on the wagon on her. (Not to mention the switch came after she found a new wagon and the meta case she came up with is nowhere to be found. What changed? It's a mystery.)
I still think Majiffy is a reliable third so I'm keeping my vote there. Otherwise, that's where I currently stand.
Tell me Cy, why should I stop when I can't even get an answer?In post 652, cytheflyguy wrote:Lmao. You know what I mean.In post 649, lane0168 wrote:Can I not spam one question?... Uh... Yes? I've not spammed all of my questions but one. Can you not ask stupid questions?In post 646, cytheflyguy wrote:Can you not spam one question please? @Lane
In post 642, lane0168 wrote:This is the one quesion and I'd appriciate it if you'd stop please.In post 643, lane0168 wrote:In post 642, lane0168 wrote:
What conflict? What the fuck are you talking about?In post 654, Realeo wrote:Hint for lane: Try to iso Shinobi+Majiffy+Dunstral in one page. You'll see the conflict.
Bc it makes you the bigger person and is less irritating to look at.In post 656, lane0168 wrote:Tell me Cy, why should I stop when I can't even get an answer?In post 652, cytheflyguy wrote:Lmao. You know what I mean.In post 649, lane0168 wrote:Can I not spam one question?... Uh... Yes? I've not spammed all of my questions but one. Can you not ask stupid questions?In post 646, cytheflyguy wrote:Can you not spam one question please? @Lane
In post 642, lane0168 wrote:This is the one quesion and I'd appriciate it if you'd stop please.In post 643, lane0168 wrote:In post 642, lane0168 wrote:
He got into a fight with Dunnstral by questioning his logicIn post 124, Shinobi wrote:But you aren't saying anything. Throwing a hissy fit and spitting in my face because you can't elaborate on a scumread is not a good look and isn't going to impress or convince anyone.In post 122, gameplay506 wrote:I am playing the game, searching for scum and you're sitting there asking me dumb questions.In post 118, Shinobi wrote:Sorry for asking you to play the game, I guess?In post 106, gameplay506 wrote:NoIn post 91, Shinobi wrote:Can you elaborate on this a bit more? This answer doesn't particularly sate me.In post 84, gameplay506 wrote:Idk Cy seems really awkward, fake and whatnot.
You're annoying. bb
I find my answer satisfying enough and you aren't going to get another one so sorry.
He got into a fight with Majiffy for being lazy.In post 117, Shinobi wrote:This doesn't really answer my question.In post 101, Dunnstral wrote:Because I naked voted him basicallyIn post 99, Shinobi wrote:Yeah, you said that already.
I fail to see how that's outside his expected range or why it's overblown. Can you fill those two gaps in logic up for me?
And he acted like I was "so sure" of my vote and overreacted and such
And so I'm keeping my vote on him
In post 92, Shinobi wrote:Aggression.
Oomph.
Passion.
Here, you just seem kind of floaty and whatever about things. It bothers me.
In post 650, Dunnstral wrote:You're arguing over whether he was actually thinking about his stuff in depth or trying to appear busyIn post 647, lane0168 wrote:Show me 2 posts of him analyzing anything. It should be easy to find something that isn't majiffy or alpaca being lackluster. Some real super analyzing. There isn't any
I wasn't saying either of that however
In post 77, Shinobi wrote:Can you elaborate on any of these things?In post 52, gameplay506 wrote:VOTE: Cy
3 pages in one night fk u
But this guy seems like a legit place to place a vote
Liking Realeo as town
In post 79, Shinobi wrote:In post 73, Majiffy wrote:Dunnstral, Farcry town
Would still like to lynch Io but will move to Frankly if the wagon doesn't kick up.
This seems a bit more apathetic than what I'm used to from you. Not a fan.
In post 91, Shinobi wrote:Can you elaborate on this a bit more? This answer doesn't particularly sate me.In post 84, gameplay506 wrote:Idk Cy seems really awkward, fake and whatnot.
In post 92, Shinobi wrote:Aggression.In post 87, Majiffy wrote:Inwardly smiling.![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
What you're used to from me?In post 79, Shinobi wrote:In post 73, Majiffy wrote:Dunnstral, Farcry town
Would still like to lynch Io but will move to Frankly if the wagon doesn't kick up.
This seems a bit more apathetic than what I'm used to from you. Not a fan.
Oomph.
Passion.
Here, you just seem kind of floaty and whatever about things. It bothers me.
In post 93, Shinobi wrote:Do you think that it's scummy to go after someone using nonexistent reasoning? I don't really follow this logic.In post 89, Dunnstral wrote:In post 58, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: FrankyIn post 55, Dunnstral wrote:[v[Franky[/v]
Because I said soFranky wrote:Why?In post 66, Franky wrote:In post 63, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:What do you have to share Franky?I'll answer these after getting a look into why Dunnstral seems so sure I'm scum.In post 65, farside22 wrote:Franky: Why are you following gameplay?
You can vote me in the meantime, I don't mind.In post 68, Franky wrote:Not really, I'm not the one who displayed certainty. I don't actually even need to justify myself, but Dunnstral does. If you lot don't see that, you should review your way of looking at the game.Franky turned my randomish vote into something big and acts as if I had some big reason for my voteIn post 71, Franky wrote:@far: Let me put it this way. The only possible way you will get any answers to any questions about this topic out of me is if you get them out of Dunnstral first.
I didn't, but now I feel good about it
In post 97, Shinobi wrote:Because?In post 95, Dunnstral wrote:I think Franky's overblown reaction was scummy
In post 99, Shinobi wrote:Yeah, you said that already.
I fail to see how that's outside his expected range or why it's overblown. Can you fill those two gaps in logic up for me?
In post 117, Shinobi wrote:This doesn't really answer my question.In post 101, Dunnstral wrote:Because I naked voted him basicallyIn post 99, Shinobi wrote:Yeah, you said that already.
I fail to see how that's outside his expected range or why it's overblown. Can you fill those two gaps in logic up for me?
And he acted like I was "so sure" of my vote and overreacted and such
And so I'm keeping my vote on him
In post 119, Shinobi wrote:Still seems like a stretch to me tbh - I just don't place much value in the "he's overreacting so he's scum" line of thought.In post 104, Realeo wrote:I will try to fill in this because I am also bothered by the same thing.In post 99, Shinobi wrote:Yeah, you said that already.
I fail to see how that's outside his expected range or why it's overblown. Can you fill those two gaps in logic up for me?
Have you ever heard the phrase, "The innocent relax, The guilty shouts." I mean, it's classic scene where your mom accuses your dad cheating, then your dad shouts back at your mom saying, "You bitch! How dare you accuse me of cheating! We have been marrying for 25 years! Do you never believe in me?"
And it turns out the father is cheating.
When I poke cy, cy just relax. When Dunn poke Franky, Franky becomes dad.
I'll pass, thanks.
I only looked because no one agreed with me so I decided to see for myself if I was right and show proof if I wasIn post 651, Shinobi wrote:I'm beginning to think that both Bins and farside are scum.
I've had this nagging feeling that Bins has kind of been talking about nothing, IE her posts about me/majiffy unvoting and voting which seemed somewhat superficial. Her vote on Dunn (which came for what I'm assuming is a nonexistent reason) doesn't help matters at all and her whole thought process seems relatively disjointed.
Farside's read flip on Io seemed to come at a really unnatural time. She had started pushing Io so long ago and only very recently started looking into her meta way,wayafter the fact once nobody jumped on the wagon on her. (Not to mention the switch came after she found a new wagon and the meta case she came up with is nowhere to be found. What changed? It's a mystery.)
I still think Majiffy is a reliable third so I'm keeping my vote there. Otherwise, that's where I currently stand.
I didn't remember you mentioning IO.In post 655, Realeo wrote:I kinda agree with your argument on Bins. Farside? Could it be possible that she's playing with feeling? I mean, if Farside is playing with feeling, then bias is going to be a factor and the biggest bias is going to be recent events.In post 651, Shinobi wrote:I'm beginning to think that both Bins and farside are scum.
I've had this nagging feeling that Bins has kind of been talking about nothing, IE her posts about me/majiffy unvoting and voting which seemed somewhat superficial. Her vote on Dunn (which came for what I'm assuming is a nonexistent reason) doesn't help matters at all and her whole thought process seems relatively disjointed.
Farside's read flip on Io seemed to come at a really unnatural time. She had started pushing Io so long ago and only very recently started looking into her meta way,wayafter the fact once nobody jumped on the wagon on her. (Not to mention the switch came after she found a new wagon and the meta case she came up with is nowhere to be found. What changed? It's a mystery.)
I still think Majiffy is a reliable third so I'm keeping my vote there. Otherwise, that's where I currently stand.
Example:
->Io was completely out of radar until I mentioned about him @ 318. When I talked about Io, he starts talking about Io.
->When Lane throws about Shinobi, he starts voting you, maybe swayed by Lane's argument.
If this feels weird, think about supporter of Donald Trump. Most Donalud Trump voter are emotional voter. "OMG, there's a radical islam attack at Nice" *silently moves from Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump*
No offense but it's not hard to do the meta yourself and since I'm phone posting I'm not going to do the link grabbing.In post 666, Bins wrote:Siiigh. I try to be less flaily and annoying. I get scumread. Typical.
I don't know what you guys want from me. I've been sharing my reads.
Also, Farside you never actually answered my question. I am interested in this IO meta.
Yup.In post 671, JaeReed wrote:@Bins Not sure if this is the meta farside used but this is at least my prior spectating experiences regarding Io.
Io town in a multiball open (Fire and Ice) here. Worth noting she replaced out here.
Io scum in a newbie (ended up in the townbloc) here. She deliberately used the newb card to her advantage here if I remember this correctly, so I'm not sure how useful this will be to determine her scumgame off of.
So ignoring the fact that this is still wrong: is there any particular reason you're not voting majiffy or why my bins read is wrong?In post 670, farside22 wrote: As for shinobi I not only are with Lany I noted that shinobi has been following a lot and pushed fuck all.
Even the fluff quotes dunn posted reinforced that the questions he ask has done nothing for him.
In post 673, Shinobi wrote:So ignoring the fact that this is still wrong: is there any particular reason you're not voting majiffy or why my bins read is wrong?In post 670, farside22 wrote: As for shinobi I not only are with Lany I noted that shinobi has been following a lot and pushed fuck all.
Even the fluff quotes dunn posted reinforced that the questions he ask has done nothing for him.
