if you don't get it now you're not going to ever probablyGorkington wrote:*post before it*In post 1191, SirCakez wrote:Who gets curious in the middle of a screaming fest if someone in it is pregnant?
"i am dealing with pregnancy mood swings"
"are you pregnant?"
i dont think its an unreasonable jump of a question at all if hed missed that context beforehand.
i certainly cant imagine any scum ever thinking thats some kind of viable strategy for derailing the game.
if hes scum, it was an empty comment.
if hes town, it was either a question to gain context or an empty comment.
i seriously dont understand how you can believe your stance right now and you hunkering down behind it so strongly is wonky.
why not?Wisdom wrote:You thought it was a good argument to push
It's not
the meta is irrelevant to this.mhsmith0 wrote:What's weird is FA explicitly said she was pregnant during the meltdown, and 3 min later creature asks her if she's pregnant. Like, it seems most indicative of a sloppy engagement w the situation, as opposed to some kind of master plan. So, since you say you have meta there, why is this sloppiness AI?In post 1175, SirCakez wrote:*fa is having a meltdown and screaming at people for no reason*
*"hey are you pregnant?"
*more screaming ensues*
not when it's a dumb fucking question like the one you madeSquare World wrote:so i am not allowed to go out of context for a bit?