AlpacaAlpaca is on V/LA
The day will end on July 30th, 2016 at 10PM EST
I wasn't voting you for town meta - people have been citing you as possible town because you're apathetic and not one person has provided the necessary justification for that being the case. This isn't me voting you for town meta - this is me voting you for playing like an apathetic shitter and how you ever got me voting you for doing things that make you town is a gross misrepresentation of why I've been thinking that you're scum. This whole "policy" narrative is so much garbage when you've done nothing but talk about irrelevancies and afk all game and somehow that excludes you from being considered a lynch target. You don't get to act like being inattentive and useless is fine when you're fucking laughing at people for trying to progress the gamestate.In post 966, Majiffy wrote:Spoiler: Shinobi Case
TL;DR Shinobi has sidelined themselves the whole game spending more time LOOKING like they're doing things and no time ACTUALLY doing things. Voting is inconsistent with reads, doesn't follow a town narrative, and looks like they're willing to vote anyone.
Does anyone know if Shinobi has any town reads? I don't recall even seeing one in the ISO. Not one.
Vote Shinobi folks. This is scumbo dumbo.
I willIn post 997, Bins wrote:if i vote good morning will people sheep me because im a voice of reason in these dark times
Okay.In post 955, Io wrote:@Shin Well you may not be my top scum read, that's reserved for Dunn. But I don't like either Alpacha's or Maji's wagon leaving you the only other person that seams to be worth lynching out of the options today.
I think you're intentionally obfuscating my point here. You're voting me *for the same reasons* as *proposed town meta*. And for what it's worth, your reason for voting me isn't valid either. Being V/LA is not apathy. It's unavailability.In post 1001, Shinobi wrote:I wasn't voting you for town meta - people have been citing you as possible town because you're apathetic and not one person has provided the necessary justification for that being the case. This isn't me voting you for town meta - this is me voting you for playing like an apathetic shitter and how you ever got me voting you for doing things that make you town is a gross misrepresentation of why I've been thinking that you're scum. This whole "policy" narrative is so much garbage when you've done nothing but talk about irrelevancies and afk all game and somehow that excludes you from being considered a lynch target. You don't get to act like being inattentive and useless is fine when you're fucking laughing at people for trying to progress the gamestate.In post 966, Majiffy wrote:Spoiler: Shinobi Case
TL;DR Shinobi has sidelined themselves the whole game spending more time LOOKING like they're doing things and no time ACTUALLY doing things. Voting is inconsistent with reads, doesn't follow a town narrative, and looks like they're willing to vote anyone.
Does anyone know if Shinobi has any town reads? I don't recall even seeing one in the ISO. Not one.
Vote Shinobi folks. This is scumbo dumbo.
Your posts talking about me talking about lane are also gross misrepresentations of what I've been doing. Realeo was questioning me at the time and was talking about lane, and now I'm the one who won't let it go? How does that work, exactly?
Your points on me votesitting were garbage when even other players acknowledged that your catchup was mediocre.
The rest of your points are incredibly nitpicky but I'm perfectly willing to tear them apart as well if you're so inclined to keep this little fight going.
I read this as dank times.In post 997, Bins wrote:if i vote good morning will people sheep me because im a voice of reason in these dark times
No I'm not - I'm voting you for being apathetic and bad.In post 1005, Majiffy wrote:I think you're intentionally obfuscating my point here. You're voting me *for the same reasons* as *proposed town meta*. And for what it's worth, your reason for voting me isn't valid either. Being V/LA is not apathy. It's unavailability.In post 1001, Shinobi wrote:I wasn't voting you for town meta - people have been citing you as possible town because you're apathetic and not one person has provided the necessary justification for that being the case. This isn't me voting you for town meta - this is me voting you for playing like an apathetic shitter and how you ever got me voting you for doing things that make you town is a gross misrepresentation of why I've been thinking that you're scum. This whole "policy" narrative is so much garbage when you've done nothing but talk about irrelevancies and afk all game and somehow that excludes you from being considered a lynch target. You don't get to act like being inattentive and useless is fine when you're fucking laughing at people for trying to progress the gamestate.In post 966, Majiffy wrote:Spoiler: Shinobi Case
TL;DR Shinobi has sidelined themselves the whole game spending more time LOOKING like they're doing things and no time ACTUALLY doing things. Voting is inconsistent with reads, doesn't follow a town narrative, and looks like they're willing to vote anyone.
Does anyone know if Shinobi has any town reads? I don't recall even seeing one in the ISO. Not one.
Vote Shinobi folks. This is scumbo dumbo.
Your posts talking about me talking about lane are also gross misrepresentations of what I've been doing. Realeo was questioning me at the time and was talking about lane, and now I'm the one who won't let it go? How does that work, exactly?
Your points on me votesitting were garbage when even other players acknowledged that your catchup was mediocre.
The rest of your points are incredibly nitpicky but I'm perfectly willing to tear them apart as well if you're so inclined to keep this little fight going.
Please show me a single instance of me laughing at people for trying to progress the gamestate.
And good luck dismantling my case when you couldn't even resist riddling your entire retort with so much ad hom I can't discern your real arguments.
So it's a policy lynch. GreatIn post 1007, Shinobi wrote: No I'm not - I'm voting you for being apathetic and bad.
You are not apathetic and bad.
I have yet to see you evenoncebe apathetic and bad.
And since that's not possible, shit they must not be lying huhIn post 1007, Shinobi wrote: People keep saying that you can be apathetic as town and nobody has explained it or told me why I should believe it, which is literal dick unless every single one of them is scum.
I was V/LA from Thursday night to Monday evening.In post 1007, Shinobi wrote: You were posting mediocre one-liners well before you went V/LA, and iirc you were only V/LA for what I assumed was a day since you didn't even say anything in thread.
Oh right when I laughed at you for having unrealistic expectations about the gamestate yesIn post 1007, Shinobi wrote: Your post of laughing at me was on, like, page 5 or something. I talked about it forever ago and you didn't debunk it then either.
They're not relevant, that's the point!In post 1007, Shinobi wrote: I fail to see how ad hominem is relevant in any case when I've just listed things you've done and how I don't like them.
Uh I'm sorry I had to DJ my cousin's wedding and there were two political conventions on either side of it?In post 1009, Shinobi wrote:UNVOTE:
I wish you didn't have to wait all the way until two days before deadline to do towny stuff.
Now I'm in this horribly awkward position and I have to find someone else to lynch.
Whatever happened to this?In post 996, Bins wrote:wow I'm so out of touch of the gamestate rn
ugh
did Alpaca townread me because he's town or did he townread me because scum feels the need to have a townread
Elaborate?In post 1010, Bins wrote:good morning came in a swung the CY obvtown to the obvscum part of the meter
Why does this matter? Seems like a pointless thing to get hung up on.