I'm not doing that?In post 772, Maxous wrote:@something smart: is there a specific reason you keep asking questions that you don't care what the answer is or if it's answered at all?
i don't see you doing in this previous town games. I actually checked
What's the answer BBT?In post 774, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Oh! Me! Me! Me! I got the answer!In post 772, Maxous wrote:@something smart: is there a specific reason you keep asking questions that you don't care what the answer is or if it's answered at all?
i don't see you doing in this previous town games. I actually checked
Yes you are.In post 769, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Pretty sure I'm not tunneling. And that made me genuinely laugh coming from you.In post 766, Wisdom wrote:stop tunnelingIn post 755, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Still not sold on YAW Wisdom?
I'm trying to get one player lynched, certainly. But I'm nowhere near tunneling.In post 767, farside22 wrote: You're tunneling on one player and thought of nothing else.
So I'm asking what your reads will be if you are wilting.
My point is for you to look beyond the tunnel.
Can you expand on the bold for me?In post 501, Young and Witless wrote: For Xkfyu, I liked in 255 how he didn't back down from what he was saying despite his terminology being challenged, and I think the way he was trying to get reads out of peoplewithout caring how it makes him lookreminds me of his towngame.
Just want to point something out here; if I wanted to look like I was doing something do you think it would be a better idea for me to share my reads instead of making a post that is sure to draw attention?In post 502, SirCakez wrote: Because not sharing reads just looks like you're just saying you have reads so you look like you're doing something.
What do you mean by this Xk?In post 511, Xkfyu wrote:I remember us talking about this exact thing in Math's Mafia.In post 501, Young and Witless wrote:For Xkfyu, I liked in 255 how he didn't back down from what he was saying despite his terminology being challenged, and I think the way he was trying to get reads out of people without caring how it makes him look reminds me of his towngame.
I didn't like the SC vote on 122 - could be an honest mistake but she very clearly misread the Vedith/SC interaction. Even so, the reasoning behind the vote is weak and I don't like it.In post 514, MagnaofIllusion wrote: So given the sparsity of reasoning on hebi as scum (which I agree with) in your ISO why are you scum-
reading her?
Walk me through what was town about Hebi's post.In post 516, Ankamius wrote: Town.
So, why are these for scum reads?
In post 689, Xkfyu wrote:Yeah, wisdom is town.
In post 711, Xkfyu wrote:Mollie, in your opinion, are you any good at faking frustration?
In post 763, Xkfyu wrote:I could vote Kuroi if the YAW lynch really isn't gonna happen. I'd probably prefer lynching him over hebichan.
Yeaaaah, I'm not a fan of xkfyu here.In post 781, Xkfyu wrote:Do you guys really think YAW is town?
thank youIn post 751, Maxous wrote:^In post 432, pirate mollie wrote:uhm
what part of I am a self-resolving issue do you not understand?
mollie has committed herself to providing some kind of role-related results on the first day period.
if she's town, just let the scum deal with her.
worst case scenario, she gets lynched day 3/4 for bullshitting.
if the scum want to commit themselves like that on day 1, let them.
either way she's going to be gone before a lylo situation
far I wld just like to point out that wis has been hard defending kuroi all game and called me scum for calling kuroi scum.In post 754, farside22 wrote:As much as I agree with you there, I don't see anyone else seeing him as scum.
I don't see anything hebichan did that's town.
At the beginning of Math's Mafia (we were both town), we had equally strong town reads on each other. He ended up scum reading me later on because even though I was active and whatnot, he didn't see anything especially townie in my posts. To which I responded something to the effect of "I never make any real effort to look town, or to avoid looking scummy, I just post what I think I need to post to solve the game."In post 782, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 511, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 501, Young and Witless wrote:
For Xkfyu, I liked in 255 how he didn't back down from what he was saying despite his terminology being challenged, and I think the way he was trying to get reads out of people without caring how it makes him look reminds me of his towngame.
I remember us talking about this exact thing in Math's Mafia.
What do you mean by this Xk?
I never said I thought hebichan is town.In post 783, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:Tell me, why do you think hebichan is town?
No, it has remained constant ever since I initially voted them.In post 783, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:Your original scum read on YAW was sheeping BBT. It then advanced after others put effort in against YAW.
Mollie isn’t getting lynched today. Join the Hebi wagon and lynch scum and I’ll help you out on Mollie tomorrow if she isn’t dead or Mod confirmed overnight.In post 714, DrippingGoofball wrote:The only thing I like about hebichan is his mollie vote
I didn’t know if you had or not but wanted to know your read regardless.In post 698, Maxous wrote:i don't think i gave one previously?
I'm very unsure about SC.
I would lean the scum side of null simply based on how long he has sat on the farside wagon for no reason.
Why are you solidly Town reading BBT for traits that are 100% easily faked as scum? And I don’t buy “he would not be more passive Day 1” for a second given BBT’s earlier back and forth with me about his previous activity levels the last 6 months.In post 758, Maxous wrote:MagnaofIllusion - seems fine I guess. nothing scummy to note.I don't think he has done anything he wouldn't be capable of faking as scumwhich is why it's a fairly light town-read.
YAR has been either the leading wagon or a strongly competing wagon for much of the day. Do you expect them not to defend themselves at all in that position? If yes do you think your perception might by that reality?In post 709, Xkfyu wrote:I get the feeling that they are more concerned with defending themselves from the lynch than they are with solving the game.
I have no problems with them defending themselves. The difference is that I think that it's their main concern.In post 789, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 709, Xkfyu wrote:
I get the feeling that they are more concerned with defending themselves from the lynch than they are with solving the game.
YAR has been either the leading wagon or a strongly competing wagon for much of the day. Do you expect them not to defend themselves at all in that position? If yes do you think your perception might by that reality?
a+ stretching of realityIn post 785, pirate mollie wrote:far I wld just like to point out that wis has been hard defending kuroi all game and called me scum for calling kuroi scum.
ohIn post 789, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So the issue I have is that at the time I asked the question YAR, hebi and Cakez were the leading wagons. As much as I think dualing scum wagons on Day 1 of a Large are possible I don’t think all three leading wagons are going to be scum unless this is some sort of Multiball scenario which we will not have any clue about until at least Day 2.
So you think all three of those wagons stand a chance of being on scum, even with a weaker Cakez read. Gun to your head which of YAR or Hebi do you think would be Town if you suddenly knew only 1 could be scum?
eh maybe i'm underestimating him but i don't think he would be able to fake the genuine conviction feeling of the push.In post 789, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why are you solidly Town reading BBT for traits that are 100% easily faked as scum? And I don’t buy “he would not be more passive Day 1” for a second given BBT’s earlier back and forth with me about his previous activity levels the last 6 months.In post 758, Maxous wrote:MagnaofIllusion - seems fine I guess. nothing scummy to note.I don't think he has done anything he wouldn't be capable of faking as scumwhich is why it's a fairly light town-read.
I'd expect scum to either ignore me, try to dismiss me, or try to turn the tables on me. What he did was none of those.In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:Can you elaborate a little? That doesn't really tell me a lot.In post 723, Ankamius wrote:His responses to me don't look like scum responses.
I think you are way overselling the ability of scum to tunnel on a slot (which is mainly what he has been doing, I noted that after he got called out for tunneling by both Farside and Wisdom he went back and tried to widen his net as it were) and appear to have conviction.In post 792, Maxous wrote:eh maybe i'm underestimating him but i don't think he would be able to fake the genuine conviction feeling of the push.
The timing of the vote. I was starting to get my initial suspicion of Kuroi around the same time when I was reading.In post 782, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Walk me through what was town about Hebi's post.In post 516, Ankamius wrote: Town.
I have nothing on whether you are scum or town. Every game that I remember playing with you, you've been town, but that's some sort of fallacy to assume it's the same this game.In post 719, SirCakez wrote:What?In post 699, PeregrineV wrote: 2. SirCakez- nope
Disagree on Wisdom feeling weird, he looks normal to me, if somewhat inactive (this is a null read)
I wasn't aware I was still voting farside, my bad
VOTE: Catdog
I do like the vote, though. What brought it about?In post 719, SirCakez wrote:What?In post 699, PeregrineV wrote: 2. SirCakez- nope
Disagree on Wisdom feeling weird, he looks normal to me, if somewhat inactive (this is a null read)
I wasn't aware I was still voting farside, my bad
VOTE: Catdog
As long as it's informative....In post 750, Wisdom wrote:Remind me to wall when i roll scum against youIn post 704, PeregrineV wrote:As for wisdom, do a word count and get back to me.