Queen of Hearts [Game Over]

ISO · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:26 am

In post 302, iraonavp wrote:
In post 300, SirCakez wrote:
In post 295, iraonavp wrote:
In post 287, SirCakez wrote:Those posts stunk like a rotten fish
Why, he said nothing...
Exactly, he made three posts that said next to nothing
I think that PeregrineV is a filthy lurker from what I have seen. Lots of people say nothing, like mimes, but that doesn't mean they are scum-aligned...

Nah, he actually does things when he is town

zMuffinMan · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 10:40 am

er... i may want to invoke lynch all liars on cakez

ISO · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:21 am

Seraphim · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 3:55 pm

In post 203, Seraphim wrote:Also, forgot this:

thenewearth, given Hark's precedent on like one of the first posts of the game, why did you not claim doublevoter?

A few things in no particular order:

(R) I really am having a difficult time getting into this game. I can't read anyone for shit. Vedith was kind of a lark to wait D1 out because I hate D1 with a burning passion and hell maybe I could get something going and see what happens. I think policy lynching a miller is probably better than most of what happens on D1 and I do honestly think that post from Vedith I quoted was pretty bad; that interaction with CKD was pretty fake even if I agree with him that CKD was ultimately "wrong" in that particular interaction given that meta doesn't exist as a real predictive output of play. I also did not like Vedith's claim but I definitely could not explain to you in words what.

Unvote

(2) I also really hate making cases. Looking thru ISOs and picking out posts is super draining and I had forgotten how much I hated formatting on this site until I started messing with URL and quote tags. Trying to say anything compelling is so difficult since I feel evidence is needed for me to back up my claims rather than making unsubstantiated assertions which is frankly what I feel 80% of this game is. Not this game in particular just the game of Mafia itself. Anyway this is a digression.

($) This is the second time I am asking this: thenewearth, given Hark's precedent on like one of the first posts of the game, why did you not claim doublevoter?

(1234) In terms of lynching and deadline we are currently less than two days away from deadline, and nothing super substantive wagon-wise is showing up.

I am going to back up Spiffeh; I think this is scum DGB.

Vote: DGB

I am fully aware that this is "meta" of a kind but it's one borne of many games played together. I cannot discern a pattern to her postings; I can only assume she's trying to keep a low profile which is only something scum-DGB does. Once again, I am fully aware that this does not come even close to explaining my feelings on the subject. She plays like someone with something to hide, trying to swim on the rotation of the game's flow of wagons and, finding none, moves around to give the impression of activity. the vote on Peregrine is exactly the sort of post I would expect someone like DGB with the scum alignment to do.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:01 pm

that's such a bad vote that I can't imagine it possibly coming from scum unless your goal was to vote for something that won't gain traction

Seraphim · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:17 pm

In post 203, Seraphim wrote:Also, forgot this:

thenewearth, given Hark's precedent on like one of the first posts of the game, why did you not claim doublevoter?

The wagon you're on also has two people on it? Why are you so sure it won't gain traction and that yours will?

I am unsure how to parse your post except to question my intelligence in whichever case I can only shrug and wait to see what other players think.

Ankamius · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:32 pm

In post 316, Spiffeh wrote:
In post 253, Ankamius wrote:UNVOTE: The Bulge
VOTE: Grapes

This game is really hard to get into.

zzz
Hey Ank if you're town can you start acting like it?

Because if you don't I will be forced to assume that you rolled scum and are staying in the background to escape my radar

Yes my ego is that big

Why wait? It's better you realize now that you're never getting me lynched this game instead of tunneling on it a few days down the line.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:34 pm

In post 330, Seraphim wrote:
In post 203, Seraphim wrote:Also, forgot this:

thenewearth, given Hark's precedent on like one of the first posts of the game, why did you not claim doublevoter?
The wagon you're on also has two people on it? Why are you so sure it won't gain traction and that yours will?

I am unsure how to parse your post except to question my intelligence in whichever case I can only shrug and wait to see what other players think.

I'm assuming you didn't mean to put that quote in there and that was directed at me?

I guess the point I was making is that your post seemed very likely to come from town given that it would be a really bad vote to make as scum unless your goal was security through obscurity

Ankamius · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:36 pm

Froot Loop could be scum too I guess.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:37 pm

MAN THAT SOUNDS FAMILIAR WHERE HAVE I HEARD THAT BEFORE

Spiffeh · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:38 pm

In post 331, Ankamius wrote:Why wait? It's better you realize now that you're never getting me lynched this game instead of tunneling on it a few days down the line.

?????

Ankamius · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:39 pm

VOTE: Froot Loop

sure

Ankamius · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:39 pm

In post 335, Spiffeh wrote:
In post 331, Ankamius wrote:Why wait? It's better you realize now that you're never getting me lynched this game instead of tunneling on it a few days down the line.
?????

What's so ????? about that?

Spiffeh · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:40 pm

I don't understand what you're saying

Spiffeh · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:40 pm

Also why Froot Loop?

Seraphim · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:41 pm

Yeah UT, there was not supposed to be a quote there, it was supposed to directly follow your post.

But I still don't follow your reasoning; isn't security through obscurity (which I also disagree I am seeking btw) something that scum seek out? Or has site meta changed while I was away?

zMuffinMan · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:41 pm

In post 337, Ankamius wrote:
In post 335, Spiffeh wrote:
In post 331, Ankamius wrote:Why wait? It's better you realize now that you're never getting me lynched this game instead of tunneling on it a few days down the line.
?????
What's so ????? about that?

maybe he's just censoring himself and his 8 key is broken

Spiffeh · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:41 pm

Do you know the Muffin Man?

zMuffinMan · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:43 pm

i know some things, yeah

i guess you could argue that i regularly know

Ankamius · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:44 pm

In post 338, Spiffeh wrote:I don't understand what you're saying

It means I'm town, and I tend to not get lynched as town.

In post 339, Spiffeh wrote:Also why Froot Loop?

His PV-vote post sucked.

Spiffeh · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:46 pm

What about DGB's PV vote?

Ankamius · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:49 pm

DGB was the second person to reach that conclusion, after one of the least-influential slots in the game. She also didn't try to justify it with awkwardly weak reasoning.

Spiffeh · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:50 pm

What are some of your other reads?

Ankamius · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:59 pm

Grapes is leaning scum.
TNE is leaning townish.

I wasn't kidding when I said this game was hard to get into.

Untrod Tripod · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:12 pm

In post 340, Seraphim wrote:Yeah UT, there was not supposed to be a quote there, it was supposed to directly follow your post.

But I still don't follow your reasoning; isn't security through obscurity (which I also disagree I am seeking btw) something that scum seek out? Or has site meta changed while I was away?

yeah absolutely, on D1 it totally would be a good scum strategy

but if you were trying to just quietly drop a vote down that would have been an ineffective way to do it

hence I just think you're town