Mini 1826: The Purge - Game Over

[shos]

The real question is why gou would egen try to check those facts and whther or not you actually did that check or you are lying.

Why is being gibberish scummy for you? Did you also meta me for my gibberish?

[shaddowez]

Following on my phone, wife's b-day celebration this weekend. More on Monday probably

[Nosferatu]

realio's alleged meta check was at post 78. there are 391 words in pisskop's games that he checked up until then. at an average reading pace of 275 words per minute, it would take 1 minute and 34.2 seconds to finish everything up to that point, from a pure iso point of view.

The speed at which he finished checking is not an issue here.

[lane0168]

Nobody said it was after he explained that he only checked rvs stage. I already said 4 minutes is more than enough to check rvs for 2 games. You went through a lot of work to check all that though and defend him for something nobody has an issue with...

Current issue for me is why stop at 2 games that don't give you a read? Why do it in the first place if you're only spending 4 minutes on a meta? Just seems... Well I'm still trying to decide how that seems

[Nosferatu]

Nobody said it was after he explained that he only checked rvs stage. I already said 4 minutes is more than enough to check rvs for 2 games. You went through a lot of work to check all that though and defend him for something nobody has an issue with...

Current issue for me is why stop at 2 games that don't give you a read? Why do it in the first place if you're only spending 4 minutes on a meta? Just seems... Well I'm still trying to decide how that seems

not defending him, I recalled seeing someone doubt he could meta in 4 mins, so I wanted to test that. He's still scum.

[Realeo]

The real question is why gou would egen try to check those facts and whther or not you actually did that check or you are lying.

Why is being gibberish scummy for you? Did you also meta me for my gibberish?

1. I checked them because pisskop hinted it. We're sharing argument and he refuted my argument from meta

2. As I said. I was gutreading so I lower the bar. I can understand your gibberish. Pisskop however is only naked voting. I confront it.

Are you actually reading the exchange?

[Realeo]

Any question? Please read my exchange between piskopp first.

[Realeo]

On another point, lane, why do you insist that I should make a read out of meta? Especially from RVS. The scope of RVS is so narrow that I don't recall people make a

genuine

read out of it.

[Realeo]

Why is being gibberish scummy for you?

Let me try to clarify this.

Back when I was playing Epic Mafia--don't worry, I am already detoxificated from it--there is something that you can say as fillering.

Yours (shos) is not fillering. Your are dumbtelling. However, I don't think you are scum who is dumbtelling--thus the reason you are not part of the trio that I fos--but simply confused.

pisskop in my opinion is fillering.

Im town.

VOTE: Epod Lady

VOTE: realeo

I argued, "Why the hell that you naked voting when RVS is over." Pisskop argued (implicitly) that it's still RVS is his opinion. He said that in his meta, he gibber like that during RVS. I meta it and his statement checks out.

Then enter you, shos, who is suddenly making fuss of it.

[Persivul]

Votecount 1.2

shos (2) - nosferatu, lane
kuroi (1) - magna
epod (1) - almost
lane (1) - kraska
vedith (1) - shadow
realeo (4) - pisskop, kuroi, shos, vedith

Not voting (3) - PeregrineV, Epod~lady, Realeo

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to strand.

(expired on 2016-09-10 06:30:00) remain until day end

[Almost50]

Most of you know I don't provide complete readlists, but here's a list of players I've decided I don't want to vote today:

PeregrineV, MagnaofIllusion, KuroiXHF, Realeo, Nosferatu, pisskop, Kraska77

That leaves me with lane0168, shos, Vedith, Epod~lady, shaddowez for a current lynch pool

As always, preliminary reads are highly volatile and subject to change with more content provided.

P.S. Can we have one or two more discussion issues going in parallel with the current "Realeo bad. No, Realeo good" please?

[Realeo]

Most of you know I don't provide complete readlists, but here's a list of players I've decided I don't want to vote today:

PeregrineV, MagnaofIllusion, KuroiXHF, Realeo, Nosferatu, pisskop,

Kraska77

That leaves me with lane0168, shos, Vedith, Epod~lady, shaddowez for a current lynch pool

As always, preliminary reads are highly volatile and subject to change with more content provided.

P.S. Can we have one or two more discussion issues going in parallel with the current "Realeo bad. No, Realeo good" please?

Mine to explain Kraska77? I am completely null at Kraska, so I am actually surprised that her name showed up. If your reasoning is due the setup spec talk, then I am kinda confused why shos is not in the "safe list"? They are both throwing ideas into the ring as well??

[Almost50]

I have a completed game with kraska. I don't have a "completed" game with shos.

[Almost50]

My reads thus far are a complete mix. Some are due to ongoing discussions, some are based on meta, and some are mere gut.

[Almost50]

Also, "not wanting to lynch today" =!= town reading. For instance, PV is NULL. He lurks as either alignment, and I've pushed him for lurking before and got him lynched as town AND as scum. I simply do not wish to push him over it on D1 (but if someone else wants to do it, they might..)

[pisskop]

we choose to vig or 1sbpeach night

[shos]

Yo guys
Crazy day
Ill read uptomorrow

[lane0168]

@almost50, how likely are you to lynch one of the people you don't want to lynch, given a solid case on one of them? I like the transparency because I usually have it in my head (whether conscious or sub concious) who I would or wouldn't lynch, but I'd like to know how firm... Nvmd, highly volatile, subject to change.

Let's just leave it at I'm down with almost50's transparency.

[lane0168]

I'm sticking with shos. He posted on this page, yet feels the need to pop in to tell us he'll read up tomorrow. I hate that shit

[lane0168]

I have a completed game with kraska. I don't have a "completed" game with shos.

I don't like this though, does it mean kraska is playing a town game? And you know what it is? Doesn't seem like a solid reason to have one you'll lynch and one you won't cause you've played with them before.

[Vedith]

I'll get to this game tomorrow.

[lane0168]

I'll get to this game tomorrow.

More of the shit I hate

[lane0168]

Man, Kuroi and Vedith - glad I didn't read the playerlist before joining! (I kid, I kid!)

But really,
VOTE: Vedith

As for the stranded mechanic, I thought that happened regardless of how the lynch happened, majority or plurality. Is it a normal death if it's majority?

Following on my phone, wife's b-day celebration this weekend. More on Monday probably

"If no majority is reached, the player with the highest number of votes is stranded"

An iso of shadowez... For doing more of the" shit" I don't like. It says if no majority is reached, stranded happens. The problem I have here is he seems to be aware of stranded, so he looked at the setup, but not at all aware of when this happens. Another one that seems to be playing dumb. Even worse than shos.

VOTE: shadow

[lane0168]

And if anyone else would like to get in this game so I'm not playing by myself besides people that will post tomorrow, that'd be greeaaaattttt.

[shos]

Il be here tomorrow.

Lol jk
Lane it is legit that peoplenotify that they are busy. Also considering that like 5 people got confused withthe rules, im p sure it is not a scumtell