STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

He also has two alliance powers, which should, on its own, be a scumclaim.

[Creature]

As a final note, all scum have guaranteed safe-claims and roles that fit the flavor of these fake-claims. Do not try to flavor-game this setup.
Scum all have had their flavor crafted before I crafted any of the town roles--I have built this setup around scum having effective, believable safe-claims.
Flavor-claims are not anywhere near the sort of town-clear that you might expect from other games.
Furthermore, I have given scum measures to punish players who are attempting to flavor-game the setup. Claim flavor at your own risk.
We are here to play mafia rendered under the flavor of Steven Universe--I will have no pity for anyone who takes the flavor as a means to attempt to outguess the moderator.

[Not Chara]

Cakez: so... what does a past read then have to do with how i feel about you now? you brought up the townread when i called your claim into question, as if it were relevant to that.
and: is mud-slinging anything negative to you at all, then. that seems like an arbitrary measure.

pedit: alliance powers have nothing to do with scum. his claim is largely NIA but has issues besides. in short: there isn't a reason to not lynch him now just because he's claimed. Varsoon has said that both town and scum have towny claims. there are a few claims i think i would say to hold a lynch for, but this is not one of them.

Creature: i don't know what you mean by bringing up that quote.

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

As a final note, all scum have guaranteed safe-claims and roles that fit the flavor of these fake-claims. Do not try to flavor-game this setup.
Scum all have had their flavor crafted before I crafted any of the town roles--I have built this setup around scum having effective, believable safe-claims.
Flavor-claims are not anywhere near the sort of town-clear that you might expect from other games.
Furthermore, I have given scum measures to punish players who are attempting to flavor-game the setup. Claim flavor at your own risk.
We are here to play mafia rendered under the flavor of Steven Universe--I will have no pity for anyone who takes the flavor as a means to attempt to outguess the moderator.

It ain't flavor I am CCing. They got cute with the role fake.

[Creature]

It means that you can't discern town from scum just by the claim.

[Creature]

As a final note, all scum have guaranteed safe-claims and roles that fit the flavor of these fake-claims. Do not try to flavor-game this setup.
Scum all have had their flavor crafted before I crafted any of the town roles--I have built this setup around scum having effective, believable safe-claims.
Flavor-claims are not anywhere near the sort of town-clear that you might expect from other games.
Furthermore, I have given scum measures to punish players who are attempting to flavor-game the setup. Claim flavor at your own risk.
We are here to play mafia rendered under the flavor of Steven Universe--I will have no pity for anyone who takes the flavor as a means to attempt to outguess the moderator.

It ain't flavor I am CCing. They got cute with the role fake.

"all scum have guaranteed safe-claims and roles that fit the flavor"

[Creature]

aka it's very unlikely SirCakez would make up a claim when he got a safeclaim (that Varsoon probably designed to not be counterclaimed).

[SirCakez]

Cakez: so... what does a past read then have to do with how i feel about you now? you brought up the townread when i called your claim into question, as if it were relevant to that.
and: is mud-slinging anything negative to you at all, then. that seems like an arbitrary measure.

Because if you were townreading me in the past then slipped to a null read like I thought, then your immediate shootdown of the unvote doesn't align with how you were reading me. But I misinterpreted how you were reading me so yeah.
Yes it is negative, that should be obvious.

I have never seen Titus so desperate for a lynch before lol.

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

aka it's very unlikely SirCakez would make up a claim when he got a safeclaim (that Varsoon probably designed to not be counterclaimed).

Unless they felt his fake wasn't enough to save him.

[SirCakez]

Yes I'm definitely faking my role alliance effects which can be publicly confirmed by 4 other people
rofl

[Not Chara]

aka it's very unlikely SirCakez would make up a claim when he got a safeclaim (that Varsoon probably designed to not be counterclaimed).

oh. you thought Titus was accusing SirCakez of making up the claim?
i assumed she was saying that part of her role is the same or similar to SirCakez's, making him more likely scum to her. (as, in theory, town would have different roles?)
but i think it depends on the moderator.

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

As well, if I'm allied everyone in the alliance gains bulletproof and the alliance will be able to chat at both Climax and Exposition.

SirCakez is permanently bulletproof? I don't think so.

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

aka it's very unlikely SirCakez would make up a claim when he got a safeclaim (that Varsoon probably designed to not be counterclaimed).

oh. you thought Titus was accusing SirCakez of making up the claim?
i assumed she was saying that part of her role is the same or similar to SirCakez's, making him more likely scum to her. (as, in theory, town would have different roles?)
but i think it depends on the moderator.

Both.

[mastin2]

@Mastin - I had an evisceration of you worked up in a draft, but I'm not going to post it.
[-post snipped, with other similar posts after excluded]

Right. You've got this long evisceration of me that you're not going to post.
And then you go and post a ton of crap eviscerating me anyway.

Suffice to say: if you actually had any content you deem relevant to me in any of your posts in that area, from either head for that matter: you're gonna have to bring it up for me again because I decided that level of character assassination wasn't worth my time.

Of course, there is one thing that I read which

is

technically correct:
I have not, in fact, made a case against SirCakez. (Just like I have not, in fact, made a case against you. Nor do I intend to, not today anyway.)
I wanted to Friday/Saturday/Sunday, but I was busy. I didn't make one yesterday, because I had something else I wanted to spend my day doing. (Drawing.) I can make the case now if anyone asks me to. Though honestly, I don't really think it's that necessary. SirCakez is just blatantly scum. I've been giving my thoughts on why he's scum here and there without backing it up, because anyone bothering to do an iso of him and look at his posts can see why I think what I do. And if not, they could have always asked, "I don't see this point, where do you see it?", or "I disagree with this point because of this", and I can explain where and why I made that point.

If it's asked of me, I will do it.
Otherwise, since we're lynching him without it, it's redundant and thus a waste of my time/effort.

[mastin2]

Each Climax I can target someone and target them with one of these abilities: see who they targeted during any Climax, who they chose to ally with during any Episode, who targeted them during any Climax, or see what action they took during any Climax (can only do this if I know who they targeted during that specific Climax).
As well, if I'm allied everyone in the alliance gains bulletproof and the alliance will be able to chat at both Climax and Exposition. And like Almost said, if everyone in my alliance votes the same person we get an extra vote that can't hammer.
During Season Finales I can make a 5-person alliance and everyone in it will get the buffs.
My Episode Event is Full Disclosure, the tl;dr is I can pick an earlier Episode in the game (can't use this until after Episode 2, activated at Climax, must be neutral or positive stress) and everyone will be reverted back to their state that episode, i;e will be in the same alliance, can only use abilities they used that Episode, and players who have died since that Episode will be able to post and use actions that night. Lynch is disabled when I use it tho, but there will also be no night kills that night. And stress is put back to 0.

I believe this claim!

I am not unvoting!

[Varsoon]

TheFuzzylogic99 has replaced Seraphim.
Please welcome them into the game.

[mastin2]

Nah, I don't lynch someone who's likely to be killed if town.
UNVOTE:

And how many phases of SirCakez

not

getting killed will it take you to reevaluate your stance?

[Firebringer]

fuzzlylogic you claimed cop, pls confirm.

[SirCakez]

I'm not going to bother arguing with scum Obi anymore
If any town want to engage me then pls go aheaf

[SirCakez]

ahead*

[Firebringer]

Cakez I am like 99.99999999999999% Sure Obi is town.

[Firebringer]

like compare Street Fighter to this game.
Its like Dark and Light differences.
Not saying she plays like street fighter all the time as scum but seriously.

[farside22]

but he can make pro-town players BP.

Any scum an fakeclaim that, since they already know whom they are killing.

Just knew that the joy ride could target each other and could not be targeted by anyone outside the group.
I was aware of the voting everyone for the same player and getting an extra vote, which I hinted at.

So, why the resistance to voting obvscum? Wouldn't the rest of you get the power?

You really aren't reading my post.
I just stated what part of his claim was truth.

Tirus= delusional

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

but he can make pro-town players BP.

Any scum an fakeclaim that, since they already know whom they are killing.

Just knew that the joy ride could target each other and could not be targeted by anyone outside the group.
I was aware of the voting everyone for the same player and getting an extra vote, which I hinted at.

So, why the resistance to voting obvscum? Wouldn't the rest of you get the power?

You really aren't reading my post.
I just stated what part of his claim was truth.

Tirus= delusional

I asked you question. Would your extra vote work if all of you voted Cakey? If so, why not vote him and be done.

[Not Chara]

the extra vote can't hammer. it was in Cakez's claim.