Mini 1834: Biker Wars: Blood in the Streets (Game over!)

Aristophanes · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:13 pm

I think that was rhetorical..

eagerSnake · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:14 pm

In post 45, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 34, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 31, Aristophanes wrote:Also, not OMGUS. Logic.
Hi Aristophanes. I'm curious, what is your definition of OMGUS?
OMGUS is a suspicion upon a player due to their suspicion on you. This ranges wildly and often includes voting someone back. However, in this case, Kuribo is stating something mathematically logical, and the situation would be the same no matter who had been voted. It is therefore not OMGUS. If something is objectively correct, how is it OMGUS!?

Not that your definition is wrong, but I have a different, simpler definition. Any time someone states anything that relates to "You're scum because you're voting/attacking me and I'm town," I consider it OMGUS.

In post 26, kuribo wrote:with me being town [...] players voting me on page one [...] at least one is a scared child, trying to fit into a man's game.

farside22 · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:17 pm

In post 49, Parama wrote:why are you asking when you already know the answer.

Well I'm curious more about your thought process on the situation.
Do you think eager post us in the same as far as style goes? Do you think there is a comparison other then he just did the same thing?

See what I saw was you read fence sitting in the post, where frankly he reads as foot in mouth.

Do you think GreyICE noticed?

Aristophanes · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:18 pm

In post 51, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 45, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 34, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 31, Aristophanes wrote:Also, not OMGUS. Logic.
Hi Aristophanes. I'm curious, what is your definition of OMGUS?
OMGUS is a suspicion upon a player due to their suspicion on you. This ranges wildly and often includes voting someone back. However, in this case, Kuribo is stating something mathematically logical, and the situation would be the same no matter who had been voted. It is therefore not OMGUS. If something is objectively correct, how is it OMGUS!?
Not that your definition is wrong, but I have a different, simpler definition. Any time someone states anything that relates to "You're scum because you're voting/attacking me and I'm town," I consider it OMGUS.

In post 26, kuribo wrote:with me being town [...] players voting me on page one [...] at least one is a scared child, trying to fit into a man's game.

Our definitions are the same, though mine more thorough.

What he was saying there is that statistically, with himself knowing his own alignment, one of his voters should be scum. To the rest of us, one of the voters and/or himself should be scum.

Why are you reading so much into this?

eagerSnake · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:20 pm

In post 53, Aristophanes wrote:Why are you reading so much into this?

You shouldn't be surprised, considering 09:12 where I tunneled ASP the entire game based on his 1st post.

farside22 · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:30 pm

Don't tunnel till day 2, take it from a known tunneler.

Parama · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:32 pm

In post 52, farside22 wrote:See what I saw was you read fence sitting in the post

in what context is pointing out a thing i didn't like but had reason to not vote for (see: follow-up post) fence-sitting?
if they are completely different things given context (like you're claiming) then why did you call eager a hypocrite anyways?

Aristophanes · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:33 pm

In post 54, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 53, Aristophanes wrote:Why are you reading so much into this?
You shouldn't be surprised, considering 09:12 where I tunneled ASP the entire game based on his 1st post.

Valid. I still have to point this out though.

eagerSnake · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:33 pm

In post 55, farside22 wrote:Don't tunnel till day 2, take it from a known tunneler.

If I know someone is scum, why not tunnel them?

Aristophanes · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:38 pm

In post 58, eagerSnake wrote:
In post 55, farside22 wrote:Don't tunnel till day 2, take it from a known tunneler.
If I know someone is scum, why not tunnel them?

How can you possibly know at this stage?

kuribo · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:38 pm

In post 51, eagerSnake wrote:Not that your definition is wrong, but I have a different, simpler definition. Any time someone states anything that relates to "You're scum because you're voting/attacking me and I'm town," I consider it OMGUS.

pardon fucking me for trying to stay in character for dramatic effect

OMGUS would be calling all five of you scum. Or even more than one.

So once more

for the people in the back

who are hard of hearing

so turn on your little hearing aides

IT'S A STATISTICAL FUCKING STATEMENT AND HOLY MOTHER OF GOD WHY THE HELL ARE YOU SO PARANOID

eagerSnake · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:38 pm

In post 59, Aristophanes wrote:How can you possibly know at this stage?

It was a general question.

Parama · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:41 pm

In post 58, eagerSnake wrote: If I know someone is scum, why not tunnel them?

but how do you

know

someone is scum

for the record, i completely disagree with farside, tunneling is always fine and not alignment indicative in any way

but you don't

know

someone is scum

Aristophanes · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:42 pm

In post 60, kuribo wrote:So once more

for the people in the back

who are hard of hearing

so turn on your little hearing aides

IT'S A STATISTICAL FUCKING STATEMENT AND HOLY MOTHER OF GOD WHY THE HELL ARE YOU SO PARANOID

<3

UNVOTE:

kraska77 · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:43 pm

VOTE: parama

kuribo · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:43 pm

In post 62, Parama wrote:but you don't know someone is scum

you do if you share a PT and a night kill and wincon with them

Aristophanes · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:45 pm

Heyyy Kraska!

What makes you vote Parama?

kraska77 · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:52 pm

Hey ari
I kind of don't like his "maybe it's playstyle" comment, feels unnaturally early to say something like that

Parama · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:56 pm

In post 67, kraska77 wrote:Hey ari
I kind of don't like his "maybe it's playstyle" comment, feels unnaturally early to say something like that

i mean, i was right on the money with that one

Aristophanes · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:57 pm

In post 67, kraska77 wrote:"maybe it's playstyle"

Maybe it's Maybelline!

I see that, but I also have liked his posts this far.

ISO · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:00 pm

VOTE: eagersnake
obvscum

ISO · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:01 pm

(That was serious just in case I wasn't clear)

Parama · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:04 pm

elaborate

Aristophanes · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:05 pm

In post 70, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: eagersnake
obvscum

In post 71, SirCakez wrote:(That was serious just in case I wasn't clear)

What makes you say "obvscum"?

ninja'd

kraska77 · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:11 pm

Cakeboy and snake are town...I think
Farfar maybe town
Parama maybe scum