In post 113, Nachomamma8 wrote:
I interpreted it more as "talk about these people" as opposed to "these are people that are priority sorts".
The rest of your answer is fair enough; I'd move onto something else, but I don't really have anything right this moment.
The "I'd move onto something else but I don't have anything" reeks of Nacho wanting to get off kraska because he knows it's a shitty push (or whatever he's calling it) but has nowhere else to go.
In post 117, Nachomamma8 wrote: In post 94, SirCakez wrote:Because it seems nacho is more interested in making kraska look like scum then actually finding scum
Camn is probably innocent because her posting is really loose. She's more uptight as scum.
There was not a place where I misrepresented kraska or made her look bad; the purpose of my questioning was not to "make her look bad", it was to figure out what she was driving at with her camn questioning.
The only place where she felt I misinterpreted her was when I said she was "worried", which I don't think was unreasonable or anywhere close to it, but feel free to disagree if you'd like. Why do you think Camn is town now (if it's just the uptight thing do you really think that not being uptight for one day is significant? could you give me an example of her being uptight as scum)? Why did you think she was scum before?
"feel free to disagree if you'd like" pings my scumdar. Shows too much uncertainty.
In post 118, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Too defensive implies odd behavior, which is worthy of questioning because either it's something I don't understand, something kraska isn't expressing well enough, or its kraska awkwardly faking something for some reason.
"Too defensive" is also something that I didn't say or imply; they're words that you put into my mouth... why, exactly?
I find Nacho's response here oddly tame. Like he just accused Cakez of misrepping him and just asks him why he did it rather than looking for motivation. Doesn't jive with me.
More "there's nothing to work with!"
In post 134, Nachomamma8 wrote:Hammering a slot for 4 posts still seems like a pretty terrible idea in general.
This is just unnecessary. The jalapeno wagon wasn't ever going through so early. Nacho knows this.
In post 140, Nachomamma8 wrote:
There's a massive difference between "white-knighting" and pushing back a lynch that is proposing to lynch you because you're a hydra, don't you think?
Again, a tame response. Here jalapeno is accusing him of white knighting and instead of looking at WHY jalapeno would say that, he posits a dumb rhetorical question.
More "there's nothing to go on yet."
In post 146, Nachomamma8 wrote:I have absolutely no idea what you're even trying to argue here: are you telling me that I should hammer you?
This reads as scum bewildered that his attempted buddying isn't working.
All of these posts just seem *off* to me.
@camn
You said earlier that you wouldn't support a Nacho lynch D1 but now say you will. What's up?