1) Ok, it's not a completely RVS vote, it's one whose reasoning is semi-serious but not 100% serious and very weak, hence fit for RVSIn post 691, Ircher wrote:1) Didnt feel like an rvs voteIn post 629, BNL wrote:But this was my RVS vote, so...?In post 600, Ircher wrote:This is just super nitpickey, to the point of unnecessarily so.In post 45, BNL wrote:In post 25, SirCakez wrote:Wgeurts pretty explicitly states the roles can be (and probably are) lyingSo you think that the roles are lies, but you don't doubt the double Hated part of your role?
VOTE: SirCakezWhat makes you think that the Counsel vote is submitted publicly?This triggered the zero weight vote on The Counsel.In post 49, BNL wrote:Let's see if this is trueIn post 42, The Counsel wrote:or to follow any voting restriction players decide.
The Counsel must vote itself at once
2) Anythings possible.
2) I guess I'll forgive you on that point; you weren't in the previous EIAL game to know that the controlled Counsel vote was submitted privately