Yeah i'll look into boring. I was really hoping that Eager would be an open shut case, but I'm beginning to think its not.In post 1206, Zoronos wrote:In post 1088, Grendel wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: EagerSnake
I was going to look more into boring since she is the leading wagon, but I feel like Snake is much scummier atm.So, Grendel, you said you'd look into Boring. What did you come up with?In post 1094, Grendel wrote:Well, I'll look into Boring too, but many of your posts have been down right manipulative.In post 1091, eagerSnake wrote:Hey. Grendel. I'm actually town but nice wallpost
Playing into unknowing majority's fear is a really scum oriented strategy.
(I read back over the ISO like I said, I see the pivot point onto Eager from his previous Eager-Town, Boring-Suspicious stance. Not entirely convinced by it, but let's run this line of questioning and see where we go)
Are you implying that scum are trying to set up a boring lynch later?PenguinPower wrote:Bold is mine. Since we're all fans of the complicated and intricate in this game, why could scum not orchestrate that in their day chat?In post 1238, nn30 wrote:Snake also pointed out that he parked his vote on Boring the entire day - and nobody nibbled -meaning 0 scum tried to hop onto the wagon and test the waters(implying that Boring herself is scum, causing the lack of interest in her wagon). I like this logic a lot.
I mean, why would scum consciously say, "lets not vote boring fam", if she were town. It seems like a pretty unlikely thing for town to pick up on normally. Therefore not something that scum would preemptively set up.
Do you think boring is town then?
Pre-edit
I hate playing when everybody is on all at once because I always feel like I'm getting flooded out by other's content .-.
You poor, attention depraved soul.Prism wrote:I'm also disturbed by the fact thatvirtually no one has read me for alignment or outed a single read on mein 24 posts.
Grendel's recent one is the closest attempt.
I'll be sure to look more into you soon.