The real folk blues [Canceled]

[Cerberus v666]

Add vedith, or replace varsoon, panzer?

[pisskop]

What's the argument against me again? I can't remember what it was

I doubt anyone on your wagon actually knows.

hi hell. can you read the game v

[PJ.]

Add vedith, varsoon has enough ill will built up from space dandy which probably played a part in me thinking it was him that said it and not vedith

[pisskop]

klingy can get wrecked too.

[pisskop]

bettee

shecan sit in the corner and watch as i do my thing.

youd best start playing Klingon

[Randomnamechange]

Is there a case on skrub not relating to him voting who someone was nagging him to do or counter wagon stuff?

[pisskop]

i made one asking why he was doing flaccid things and bring illogical about how he pursued his scumread of kraska/hoodrat.

y?

[MathBlade]

Panzer and davesaz: you guys agree with

3) There is scum in our hood and Mirhawk keeps insisting it is not the case and posting terribad bullshit in there.

?

Neither of you have seemed interested in pushing Mirhawk in thread so I'm curious if you agree with math's take here, or if you think they're just wrong, or if you think they're bullshitting.

I've already talked about this, but I believe the Kraska claim(or at least I'm willing to test it), so as a result of that, I do not currently believe that there is a scum in the neighborhood. I think this varsoon counterwagon is scummy as hell because I believe it's beating a dead horse.

Math's argument against Kraska is basically that she was scummy d1 and played her claimed role wrong therefore she is scum -> which makes Mirhawk her buddy who gave her the inside info. My counterargument is sometimes people play bad, man. I play bad all the time because I am bad. So if Kraska is bad town then Mirhawk probably isn't scum cause the most damning thing is gone.

I'm in on Skrub, Varsoon,or Exp for now. If something convincing comes up, I can be coerced into going a different direction. I 100% will not be on (another) Mirhawk wagon today.

1) They
2) One key element is missing from the above that is damning but if I share it Y happens and Y is bad.
3) Just stawp. Mirhawk's post in the hood said Mirhawk was faking caring about the game.
4) Of the reads Mirhawk did give after being poked do not make sense.
5) People play bad yes. However as soon as Vifam died the first post out of Kraska's mouth should have been "I am PGO. I killed Vifam." Then I would believe bad d1 play but to only claim it under hella pressure is fake as shit.

[davesaz]

^i.e. the list of people in the hood

It's Vifam (formerly), Mathblade, Mirhawk, Panzer, davesaz

Panzer and davesaz: you guys agree with

3) There is scum in our hood and Mirhawk keeps insisting it is not the case and posting terribad bullshit in there.

?

Neither of you have seemed interested in pushing Mirhawk in thread so I'm curious if you agree with math's take here, or if you think they're just wrong, or if you think they're bullshitting.

The correct statement is there could be scum in our hood. It's not a masonry, but no guarantee there is scum either.
I think the sensible approach is to consider lynching the last one standing after the rest are NK'd, unless there is some town confirmation before that point.
The only rush lynching within the hood would be to clear it for safe conversation, which I would not call a priority.
Of course if we had an actual guilty and not circumstantial evidence, I'd be on that already.

[Aristophanes]

^ Good points Dav. I don't see a reason to lynch anyone in the hood any more than outside of it.

It is wine. We should lynch people for being scummy instead

[davesaz]

Confirm Mirhawk made a comment about faking being interested in the game. But it's not clear he's the scum (if any).

Agree that, if Kraska has a role which matches the kill it would make sense to claim that earlier. I pointed out someone who appeared to be coaching her on what to say, and her claim came after that coaching. Which makes me wonder whether it's a fakeclaim, and after Gistou it would not surprise me in the slightest if FA provides scum with a flavor fakeclaim.

My playstyle works best when there are big wagons, preferably big changes in big wagons. If y'all would please assist with running one or more people up I'd be grateful.

[PJ.]

1) I'm not using the pronoun about you, you dumbshit, learn how to read. Those pronouns are all for kraska, a she. Also someone that you have been calling "he" despite being corrected, so shut the fuck up about pronouns. You're the only one that cares and you're the one who is fucking it up more than anyone else.
3) No one gives a fuck about this game, is everyone scum?
5) She didn't know her kill flavor and it was "hella" unclear, because half the game thought it was 2 kills.

[Skrub]

Is there a case on skrub not relating to him voting who someone was nagging him to do or counter wagon stuff?

The other argument is that I'm defensive when people form wagons on me

[SpyreX]

Panzer only madness lies down this path

[pisskop]

Vedith, you need to come out and play with me for a bit. Youre posting hsit that doesnt make sense.

[Aristophanes]

Vedith, you need to come out and play with me for a bit. Youre posting hsit that doesnt make sense.

says the guy who said this:

You know whats cooler than bread? fuggin apples. cuz humanity's primary foodstuff is apple.
you liked buildinga with magical.properties? good cuz now they do gamebreaking stuff
he, you know how you get a GG for being a good conquerer? now you xan use it to make one tile useless AND magic AND now its defensiv. yiu know the exact opposite of good play?

ba
yyfufhujjfnj

I am still confused

[pisskop]

Civ V was the death of the series for me.

[pisskop]

ciV, also known as 4xLite, was a game in which you were only allowed to place 1 unit on a tile at a time, where the 'hipstered' the mechanics they did keep (apples instead of fucking food staples being an aesthetic example) and chucked vastamounts of good ones in favor of ass-backwards diplomacy (in a series known for its ass-backwards and exploitable diplomacy before this -> really says something when the AI doesnt even fucking know what they are going to do from turn to turn) and granting the player magic mages who pop up and agress a grinding stalement instead of actual gameplay.

[Aristophanes]

Civ V was the death of the series for me.

I only ever played I-III

[pisskop]

They took a longtime favorite series of mine and shit right on it, then grabbed alpha centuri and went for seconds on the dutch porn.

[pisskop]

Anywho.

Ari why are you voting rando?

[Aristophanes]

That sounds brutal!

Anywho.

Ari why are you voting rando?

If we want a Lurker lynch, this is where it should be. Though I have not read his.posts since my vote.

I was mostly just making a point that lurker votes are useless, even as utility/policy lynches.

[pisskop]

They are not.

Theres this misconception that the lurker will just lurk.


And tbf they will. Until we toughen up enough to lynch it. The way to fix bad play is to punish it.

[pisskop]

And if its scummy so much the better.

Why not vote skrub. Do you think thats a policy lynch? who would be better?

[Aristophanes]

Not really.

If we intend to lunch them, we've written them off already and aren't scumhunting. If we do not, it often leads to apathy, or people pleasing. Either way it tells us little. Ezp3lecially in a game of this size, lurker pressure serves little purpose. If someone is lost in the content, a wagon won't help.