He might not be!
He's just on the shortlist. The slot just below Nahdia. (Nahdia is seventh, RC is sixth, Vaxkiller is fifth.)
He might not be!
And therein lies your problem.In post 1059, Accountant wrote:Vaxkiller have made two posts, both of them NAI.
The beautiful thing about mafia games, especially NUKE THEM ALL ones, is you're allowed to be wrong!In post 1081, Nukebringer wrote:i don't know if i agree with any of these mastina, maybe rc?
Well you just wanted them so you wouldn't be able to clean your room mr manIn post 1201, Papa Zito wrote:SpyreX you sound like my mom.
Spyspy-chan, on a scale of one to ten how do you feel about RedCoyote 1 being "needs death yesterday"In post 1206, SpyreX wrote:Well you just wanted them so you wouldn't be able to clean your room mr manIn post 1201, Papa Zito wrote:SpyreX you sound like my mom.
If everything is on the floor it's easy to find.In post 1206, SpyreX wrote:Well you just wanted them so you wouldn't be able to clean your room mr manIn post 1201, Papa Zito wrote:SpyreX you sound like my mom.
In post 1181, GuyInFreezer wrote:Vax is also town.
This is also 100% gutread from his ISO in general.
In post 1188, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Vaxkiller flips Commie scum and I hearby label their whole exchange the most painfully awkward bus / distancing ever ...
In post 1573, BBmolla wrote:Do you think you have to wholeheartedly and completely disagree with everything your scumread says?
Ok nice another box on you Meaningless Buzzword Bingo sheet. What do you to match five in a row? Over-defensive?In post 1215, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Also second time you're lining up lyches.
Extremely scummy thing to do.
I got lazy with my explanations, and some of it can be best describe as "gut". Regarding your vote --> The way you did it seemed super care-free amongst other things; really pinged me.In post 1070, xRECKONERx wrote:why do you not like me voting noIn post 1019, Ircher wrote:xRECKONERx (-75%) - I really didn't like the way he voted No to Total War.... Some of his posts like #321 really look like scum posts, but the slot's posts are starting to look better.
why do my posts look like scum posts
Did you even READ the spoiler text I ADDED IN?In post 1071, xRECKONERx wrote:what does this meanIn post 1039, Ircher wrote:Seriously Reck? SERIOUSLY?
Reevaluate later means I do it when I finish catching up or your posts and do ISOs, you give me reason to change my opinion, or someone else's posts give me a reason to change my opinion.In post 1072, xRECKONERx wrote:ircher how is it i have been listed as "reevaluate this slot" for several consecutive posts now
ircher can die to nukes imo
Nuke that^In post 1216, McMenno wrote:LIST OF THINGS TO DO
READ THREAD
PLAY MAFIA WITH PAPA ZITO
WORSHIP PAPA ZITO?
NUKE SOME COMMIES
In post 1175, Papa Zito wrote:also: phrasingIn post 1156, SpyreX wrote:Cause then i can feel your vibe yo
Explain your reasons clearly
Explain your reasonsIn post 1200, mastina wrote:He might not be!
He's just on the shortlist. The slot just below Nahdia. (Nahdia is seventh, RC is sixth, Vaxkiller is fifth.)
Explain the "clues"In post 1204, mastina wrote:And therein lies your problem.In post 1059, Accountant wrote:Vaxkiller have made two posts, both of them NAI.
There were some definitive alignment clues in Vaxkiller's posts.
These clues were not, mind you, particularly solid! He's on the shortlist. Not on the scumlist. What was there was indicative of scum, but not strongly enough to BE scum, not off of just two posts anyway.
Umm
In post 1157, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Hmm why is your first question then asking whose fault it was we didn't go to war if you already know via ISOing the mid?
Posts like "505" show who is not voting for war.In post 1163, Vaxkiller wrote: 1. I was skimming and I saw most of the posts said "not voting: everyonelse". So I saw posts like 505 but missed 559