The Kroll Family appreciates concision.
-Excerpt fromThe Fifteen Familiesby Frederick Kendall
There is not much of an actual wagon on me, but Sondam's vote seemed very opportunistic. I have limited time for now (not so limited that I require V/LA but not as much time as I would like) and I do not need a vote on GE.In post 497, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Sondam believes the BTD wagon has more traction
i mean ok i could be wrong n they haven't posted much lately but there are people i actually sr and sondam will be useful later if they're townIn post 511, Impoetic wrote:what no why are we wagoning sondam
No, only BTD stuck out as a bit scummy about it, both in the words he used (seems like maybe he has more knowledge than I do about evil powers?), and the vibe I got from his involvement. I didn't get it from others who were involved as much. I don't apply generalities. I go case by case basis, in each situation, not even from game to game or person to person. Just because 1 person was like this in this game, doesn't mean that their same behavior means the same thing in this other game. Yes, it is important to look at and analyze those things, but you can't just start generalizing meanings, and so you certainly can't do that from individual to individual in a game. 1 person talks about something because they think it is good to talk about, another talks about it because they know it is causing confusion to do so, and a dozen things in between.In post 469, BATORU wrote: The first bit that you said was saying nothing I believe was part of the general conversation in the thread at the time, so you either find everyone who was talking about it to have been fillering & scummy rather than speccing about the mechanics, or you find the original person who questioned it and turned the thread focus that way scummy, or you should find it a net null imo.
I find a lot of times scum don't think before posting and are just excited to talk about the things without realizing it's scummy to talk about the things / or that they might give slips if they talk about the things. I find this is what is possible here, that he didn't realize he had terminology available to him that was not available to others and went to talk as if it was shared knowledge when it wasn't. It's been a bit now I should probably go re-read and see how it all progressed and if I still feel that way about it.In post 469, BATORU wrote:What do you think BTD's motivation would be for posting that as scum? What do you think his motivation would be for posting that as town?So I went back and saw 51 which sounds possible that he knows more than I do about the evil faction. Those 2 posts together warrant my vote.In post 87, Nosferatu wrote:I have a problem with this but I can't articulate it, which bothers me; so I'm going to regress to a younger state of development and call you and idiot.In post 51, BTD6_maker wrote:Dark magic is probably just the scum's factional kill. Scum can probably also use regular spells normally.
idiot.
The reason for my FoS - 87 it sounds possible that Nosferatu is scum-buddies and is GRRR at scum-buddy for talking as they did and this is their way of saying "yooo, careful!" The FoS only becomes meaningful if I am right about BTD6, if I'm wrong about BTD6, it will make Nos a townlean for me because yes, I too "have a problem with this", but I can articulate it, that you can't seems questionable.
~Ruko
and that makes him scum here why?In post 514, Gamma Emerald wrote:OKAY HERE'S THE FUCKING DEAL
WISDOM GOT CAUGHT AS SCUM BY SONDAM IN A PAST GAME
WISDOM IS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY TRYING TO FEARLYNCH
VOTE: Wisdom
lol'dIn post 514, Gamma Emerald wrote:OKAY HERE'S THE FUCKING DEAL
WISDOM GOT CAUGHT AS SCUM BY SONDAM IN A PAST GAME
WISDOM IS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY TRYING TO FEARLYNCH
VOTE: Wisdom
and it will most likely continue being that way because this playerlist is pretty foreign to me
Piss offIn post 519, Wisdom wrote:and it will most likely continue being that way because this playerlist is pretty foreign to me
In post 490, Dunnstral wrote:For gerryIn post 393, Dunnstral wrote:In post 212, Dunnstral wrote:In post 107, Sondam wrote:Ah, okay. Dunn seems to have a few votes on him already. But he scum claimed in that post I quoted.
Gamma is town. This is fairly easy already.
~GIn post 111, Sondam wrote:Anyone who thinks Dunn didn't scum claim in that post is scum with him.
~GIn post 127, Sondam wrote:Shouldn't you be more worried about how you literally scumclaimed lolIn post 124, Dunnstral wrote:I have no clue who's saying what
~GExplain these postsDon't make me keep posting thisIn post 214, Dunnstral wrote:and thisIn post 105, Sondam wrote:scum claim.In post 46, Dunnstral wrote:WaitIn post 28, ironstove wrote:I have spell-reflect, it lets me fire back the first spell that is cast on me. So CURSE YOU!
How does this work? Wouldn't it give whoever targets you the spell to reflect back other spells in exchange for what they used?
Probably shouldn't have claimed
I find a lot of times scum don't think before posting and are just excited to talk about the things without realizing it's scummy to talk about the things / or that they might give slips if they talk about the things. I find this is what is possible here, that he didn't realize he had terminology available to him that was not available to others and went to talk as if it was shared knowledge when it wasn't. It's been a bit now I should probably go re-read and see how it all progressed and if I still feel that way about it.[/quote]In post 515, drealmerz7 wrote:[quote="In
What do you think BTD's motivation would be for posting that as scum? What do you think his motivation would be for posting that as town?
~Ruko