You just ensured your own death tonight though.In post 1974, Aj The Epic wrote:It was a spell. Scum already know how they got targeted, because Dunn holds the spell.
You could claim that shit tomorrow instead.
>.>
You just ensured your own death tonight though.In post 1974, Aj The Epic wrote:It was a spell. Scum already know how they got targeted, because Dunn holds the spell.
^^In post 1979, drealmerz7 wrote:or you need to take yours out of yours and tell me why I need to unvote instead of just demand things and expect them
That would be positing that Aj roleblocked Dunnstral using a spell, though, and caused a no kill as his partner. If you were going to do that wouldn't you go for roleblocking him and having another partner do the kill?In post 1991, Prism wrote:Will have more thoughts over the weekend but for now I still FoS Aj. Ironstove was still playing to his wincon all game despite going off the deepend at the end, and that wincon apparently included lying about his spells.
In post 1980, pisskop wrote:soi, you know who i gave the hood to, rite?
Good point, unlikely partner in any case.In post 1995, BATORU wrote:That would be positing that Aj roleblocked Dunnstral using a spell, though, and caused a no kill as his partner. If you were going to do that wouldn't you go for roleblocking him and having another partner do the kill?In post 1991, Prism wrote:Will have more thoughts over the weekend but for now I still FoS Aj. Ironstove was still playing to his wincon all game despite going off the deepend at the end, and that wincon apparently included lying about his spells.
I mean, if he didn't roleblock him and instead no kill gambited, we'll see it with the flip, that's why I specifically asked if it was a spell or an ability. It's too easy a lie to be caught out on.
~Ruko