Newbie 1761: Welcome to Mafia (Game Over)

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:25 pm

Algebra's response almost makes me think he did it to fake confirm himself as town which would be amusing but I don't think it's the case right now.

Equinox · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Mon Jan 02, 2017 11:01 pm

Vote Count 3.01

Not Voting (6) - algebra, CloudKicker, Nachomamma8, PenguinPower, SensFan, Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez

With 6 votes in play, it will take 4 to lynch.

The deadline is Monday, January 16, 2017, at 9:00 PM EST (UTC-5), which is in (expired on 2017-01-16 21:00:00).

Moderator CommentsCloudKicker is on V/LA from January 1 to January 4.

algebra · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:37 am

Or the roleblocker forgot.

PenguinPower · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 4:12 am

So, either the RB forgot to block and the protect went through; the RB blocked/didn't block and there was no NK action submitted; there is no RB, and algebra/scumbuddy intentionally no killed to try and get conf!town status.

I think it's the last, and I think that Nacho and algebra are the scumteam.

algebra · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:14 am

What happened to CloudKicker, PP?

algebra · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:16 am

I'd bet CloudKicker missed his action due to v/la.

PenguinPower · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:20 am

N2 and the opening of D3.

p-edit

So, it has to be either Cloud or Zaraki due to them being inactive. Nah.

D1 - you softclaim PR to prevent a lynch
N1 - despite being the sole remaining PR, scum decide not to kill you. Explanation - they know they can roleblock you
D2 - hardclaim Doc because you have to
N2 - scum forget/can't RB you, you aren't (no one is) killed. Both scum would have to be absent for this to happen.
D3 - you claim to have protected Nacho and now you are both conf!town.

Nah. You're scum.

algebra · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:51 am

We are both confirmed town, if the roleblocker (Cloud) forgot to roleblock me.

PenguinPower · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:52 am

In post 957, algebra wrote:We are both confirmed town, if the roleblocker (Cloud) forgot to roleblock me.

I thought it was Zaraki?

In post 947, algebra wrote:Maybe Zaraki is the rb, and just forgot.

algebra · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:52 am

I'm going to reread and try and see why Deimos wasn't lynched D1.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:14 am

In post 953, PenguinPower wrote:I think it's the last, and I think that Nacho and algebra are the scumteam.

This theory doesn't make sense.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:15 am

I'm not allowed to lie about theory. Setting me up for conftown status by no killing doesn't work unless I lie about theory.

PenguinPower · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:21 am

In post 961, Nachomamma8 wrote:Setting me up for conftown status by no killing doesn't work unless I lie about theory.

Can you explain this more? Why would you have to lie about theory for that scenario to be true?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:40 am

Confirmed town (mechanical clear) is game theory. There is no possible way for me to claim that I am confirmed town via nightkill without lying about game theory.

PenguinPower · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:46 am

In post 963, Nachomamma8 wrote:Confirmed town (mechanical clear) is game theory. There is no possible way for me to claim that I am confirmed town via nightkill without lying about game theory.

That doesn't preclude my scenario from being true.

1. You didn't claim that you were conf!town. algebra did. Nice way to get around that. Bonus points because you get to point out that you're not.

In post 949, Nachomamma8 wrote:Not confirmed town. Either scum forgot or they strategically no-killed, which would have been an absurd move.

2. You state that scum could have strategically no-killed and that it would be absurd. It doesn't mean that you/alg didn't do it, only that it would be absurd. You're not lying and it takes suspicion off of you because, why would the IC make an absurd move?

SensFan · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:53 am

@Nacho, do you want to lynch alg or PP today? I'm fine with either.

PenguinPower · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:24 am

VOTE: algebra

algebra · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:26 am

Guys, this is MYLO you need to rethink this. Why do you think I'm scum?

PenguinPower · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:33 am

Guessing that question is not directed at me...

What are thoughts on a no lynch today?

algebra · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:35 am

Scum isn't going to kill me if we NL, and you will lynch me tomorrow if things follow the current path. A NL won't change the fact that lynching me loses the game.

Zaraki_Jaegerjaquez · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:39 pm

Why would we lose? Also algebra you seem to be trying to push the blame on anybody you can. Why?

algebra · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:27 pm

We would lose because if we NL and someone gets NKed, it's LYLO. I get lynched, and scum wins.

algebra · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:28 pm

Where am I pushing the blame on somebody else?

PenguinPower · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:39 pm

In post 971, algebra wrote:We would lose because if we NL and someone gets NKed, it's LYLO. I get lynched, and scum wins.

You're assuming I would still want to lynch you after the NK. Why?

algebra · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:45 pm

Because I'm the current lynch candidate?