It doesn't actually now that you've pointed out the flaw.In post 670, Huntress wrote:Nope. That quote was me saying that I had been prepared to give Sobolev time as she had just replaced in, but that post 503 had confirmed my scumread on that slot.In post 614, lucca261 wrote:This quote by Huntress feels like once Sobolev had a good answer, she would've switched her vote to Loopdan. But if things didn't work out, she would be voting Fred.
How does this fit in with the lack of a kill night one? Because obviously Fred wasn't the target so scum would know that wasn't the case.In post 617, Loopdan wrote:I think scum thought ^those posts weree Sick saying he doc'd Soblev and that's why scum NK'd Sick.
How does it make sense?In post 623, TheBrie wrote:That makes sense.
It's beside the point anyway. I don't believe that anymore. I agree with Lucca that scum must have picked up that Sick was a tracker.