First, since there are so many players from the earlier game: I
about the Avatar issue in 657. Yes, I was scum there. And I doled out a lot of shit. However, explanation given in the context of Spade's Avatar was absolutely the truth. You only have my word for it, except a scarce mention in the scum PT (
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p8533449). Read the last couple of lines in
para.
Page 7 apparent backpedaling: There was none. I didn't suspect Grey till later. But on page 7, I didn't suspect him. I was in fact thinking of him as a town trying to bait scum in his initial post. I asked Grey to explain what was he trying to achieve. Multiple times. I was curious to understand how he was trying to bait the scum. I asked him
on page 7 alone. Ref.
152,
159,
164 and
167.
Rather he was replying to me all the time, without any reference to what I was asking. So to pressurise, I voted for him in 167. Pat came the reply from him in
169. Not that he answered my question, but at least he referred to it. That's all that pressure vote was gonna achieve[/color][/b], I realised that, and I removed it in
174.
I asked Grey two questions:
1. What was the motivation in claiming?:
This translates into understanding how was he hoping to trap the scum?
2. Why aren't you questioning Bang?:
Assuming that the motivation was to trap a scum (no Kop, it
. I thought that too, but Grey himself said much later that that post was meant to see who bites the bait), and you got someone (in Bang) who did, why are you letting him off easily? I have seen it happening so many times that the original thoughts and motivations of players get lost in the deluge of posts. Should I have worded it differently? Maybe. Maybe I should have asked him politely, and not asked him 'why' coz that questions his motivation. And I didn't doubt his motivation anyway (at least not then). What I meant was, time to deliver what you indirectly promised in the first post.
in
169 which continued thereafter in multiple posts, was totally unnecessary.