Give it hugs for actually showing up today.In post 4674, Elbirn wrote:Titus stole my thunder, now I'll never get credit for catching scum
What about MY ego Titus?
#incrabbymood
Give it hugs for actually showing up today.In post 4674, Elbirn wrote:Titus stole my thunder, now I'll never get credit for catching scum
What about MY ego Titus?
EBWOP. I can't math. I think the title of the thread hasn't been updated.In post 4681, Pine wrote:I didn't. I'm out of shots. If I were still a roleblocker, I'd have blockedN5and realized Tywin was innocent. I'm essentially a VT now.
There isn't a good reason. It is objectively an error.In post 4689, Elbirn wrote:Can someone better at math than me tell me this, why does scum no kill twice? Wouldn't one no kill have gotten us to a 4 player mylo the previous day phase or something?
Okay, and if we take that into account, then scum no-kill because a 3p lylo would really be a 50% of getting scum.In post 4690, Pine wrote:Nonsense. It's scum keeping their options open, but percentage-based assessments are a fallacy. Titus doesn't have a 25% chance of getting lynched, it's pretty much 0%. We're not random-lynching here.
Jesus christ dude you get my point stop being a pedantic little bitchIn post 4693, Pine wrote:Stop using percentages. That isn't how it works.
VOTE: No lynch - vote early night
Yes, but my point is that no lynching won't change anything. Either they no kill again and we're back here once more, or they kill you or I and we're in this position with less wisdom.In post 4697, Titus wrote:VOTE: No lynch - vote early night
Pine, if scum deliberately no killed, they want the game state like this.