No, I can’t. I can show you how Nebula called Toto’s play scummy / anti-Town and then came to the conclusion that Toto was “bad Town” which is the point I made. Would you like that?In post 1190, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:MoI, can you show me where Nebula is calling Toto scummy after claiming they're bad town?
197 and 200 are the response to Toto’s calling out of Nebbie’s “soft-claim” as anti-Town and dumb.
220 indicates that Toto “dismissed” an earlier question and asks Toto what possible Town motive he would have for the “spotlighting the soft-claim”.
226 says that Toto is taking a quote “out of context”.
235 again questions whether there was any Town motive for the whole soft-claim spotlight.
271 claims Toto is “reaching” in his assessment. There is a comment about Sesq and “scum-theatre” that 275 indicates shows fake interactions between Sesq and Toto. To be scum theatre you need both players involved to be scum.
Finally in 346 we arrive at the post that originally made me think “Nebula is scum who is Town reading Toto for bad reasons”.
So Nebula spent a large number of posts continually asking Toto why he as Town would point out a soft-claim and called Sesq and Toto interactions scum theatre. Then suddenly at 346 he’s “Town caught in a death tunnel” for not appreciable reason.
--
Umm a case on an unflipped player is hardly “plenty of information” to parse your slot. If at some point today we get an Elena scum flip than sure … the likelihood of you as a partner is pretty remote. On the other hand an Elena Town flip means that as things stand now I have what would be a tunnel on dead Town.In post 1196, hapahauli wrote:Hell, you have plenty of information to read me. It's not my fault or my "scum-strategy" that you're intentionally not reviewing my case because you want to wait on your town-reads.
Who are your Town reads?