In post 40, Srceenplay wrote:
The other assumption is that you will be able to lynch scum without them getting information on a pr.
Scum will kill at night that is unavoidable. Mislynching is avoidable by
VOTE: no lynch
Are you ok with lynching a town? I'm not.
This is screaming scum vibes to me at this point.
In post 59, Srceenplay wrote:
I found one scum for us. Vote her up.
:Mic Drop:
I'm out.
And then the sudden reversal to this.
So the way I see it, one of two things is going on here.
1.) You realized the mistake of your no lynch push and jumped to this to try and get the attention off of that.
2.) You're scum and are making one heck of a gambit.
This only plays out a couple of ways. Since you have given no actual reasoning to believe she is scum, it logically follows you don't have any. Please do correct me if I'm wrong on this point.
So we could lynch you, and if you flip scum we can reasonably assume that either she's town or it was a gambit. It would be a pretty big stretch for it to be a gambit, but possible. If we lynch you and you flip town, we learn nothing whatsoever. If we lynch her and she flips town, then you go tomorrow, and if you're town that means you put us into 5 man LYLO with this stunt (presuming no kills are stopped).
I'm inclined to just assume we've got caught scum (you) in this bizarre turn of posts.
Please explain why and how you have "found one scum for us". If your explanation and reasoning make no sense, be prepared to defend yourself, because I can see absolutely zero town motive in your play so far, but lots and lots of potential scum motives.
At that point in the game everyone was convinced Srceenplay was scum but he brings up the possibility that he's making a gambit, although as scum.
So you see town motivation in not considering I'm town?? Did I read that right?