mini-normal 1892 - GAME END - Bodies, all over the floor

bjc0303 · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:23 pm

In post 249, Fart wrote:246 is bj's best post yet

Wow it's as if there's actually fucking content to comment on

Omg RVS/early shitposting is a thing!!

alban · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:46 pm

In post 23, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 19, Superhans wrote:Hiya everyone

In post 20, Superhans wrote:VOTE: Mono
Clearly you are not even paying attention to what is said itt, or so it appears. I think you are trying to play it off like you are taking it easy, but in reality you are afraid that people are going to find you Scummy. Its likely you already read all the responses itt and are voting momo so that a wagon builds as a way to deflect attention away from yourself. Your entrance also doesn't fit with the tone I set with my first posts, so that has me thinking you are Scummy.

Caught up till page 8.

LQ Townlean. Early analysis is hasty and overenthusiastic, but not necessarily scummy. Some (every?) analyses are followed by questions. Think scum will be more interested in implicating than clarifying. Think he is playing a lousy game as a townie though.

Superhans, Nancy, BJC - scumlean.
Superhans trying to interact with everyone. Wants to be in good books of everyone? Trying hard to be light and superficial?
Nancy and BJC set off alarms. Seemed fake. Nancy defensive. BJC casual.

Fart and Frank - null.
Fart over-analysing. Especially with their case on Frank (#111).

alban · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:47 pm

The quote wasn't necessary.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:40 pm

In post 202, bjc0303 wrote:Also christ can we go a game without basing everything on how people "normally" play? Meta is the dumbest thing about mafia hands down

Pedit ok well take note of who votes

If Meta is the dumbest fucking thing then reason and explaining triumphs and you have not given that, just made stances. How is your play any better here?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:43 pm

In post 214, Desully wrote:
In post 163, FrankJaeger wrote: Wow.

LQ gets town points for this post, based on effort.
Although I do think tone isnt easy to gauge through text.
Its even harder to say tone is AI.

I dont think LQ says specifically that he thinks it AI. But its what I got from this post.
This post is unbelievably scummy

Agree

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:50 pm

In post 234, ConManMick wrote:Desully is Kain Tempes alt confirmed

Super, I explained my vote, so piss off Clarence
Quick town read:
Fart, for contributing the triptastic graphics. Anyone wants to lynch Fart can fight me
Fart, I have a question for you: do you think you can Handel this game?

So you're town reading Fart for using "graphics?" Not immediately the most AI thing I can come up with honestly.

Why come in here and give one controversial read with poor reasoning as your first real post?

Ms Columbo · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:19 pm

Hi, all! Mondays and Wednesdays are my long days.

I've played in a game with LUV and Nero, I think that's all. Here are my thoughts so far:

Superhans’s play feels natural and trippin

In post 192, Superhans wrote:LQ is always 'odd', as his signature says, he is very much a non traditional player. Nevertheless I did not understand how/why he is playing like the way he is. And i don't like it.

Can you expand on this? What don't you like?

In post 226, Superhans wrote:Can't see scum doing something that unsophisticated so early game. See it as very keen town being a tad manipulative.

What’s the context of this post? Was it referencing the post before it?

Ms Columbo · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:41 pm

@LQ – What does the “Doesn’t” in your EBWOP post refer to?

It must be a spur of activity in LQ’s head, no need for acid there. Read so far – trying hard for town, perhaps too hard early, slight town lean.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:55 pm

In post 257, Ms Columbo wrote:@LQ – What does the “Doesn’t” in your EBWOP post refer to?

It must be a spur of activity in LQ’s head, no need for acid there. Read so far – trying hard for town, perhaps too hard early, slight town lean.

Its meant to clarify so it actually makes sense.

Ms Columbo · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:17 pm

My thoughts so far seem most in line with horrordude. Found myself agreeing here:

In post 109, horrordude0215 wrote:
In post 108, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 29, nancy wrote:LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.
Why are there no votes on this?
When this post was made half of the playerlist hadn't even posted yet, and the case presented seemed like a bit of a stretch at best. Trying to push a game out of RVS before it gets there naturally has a tendency to stifle discussion or make everyone in town rehash the same points over and over again.

and here:

In post 161, horrordude0215 wrote: I don't necessarily think that nancy saying a short RVS stifles discussion is scummy, I see it as more of a difference in playstyle than anything.

BJ literally said to powerlynch someone on page 3 (because you were "trying to hard)? While I agree that the initial case was weak, the attempt to get out of RVS early wasn't scummy. BJ implied that you were trying to hard, and has since contributed nothing to the thread.

If I needed to vote right now, it would most likely be bjc. It felt like he was pushing an agenda from the start (to lynch LQ). #195 feels defensive. I wouldn’t expect that from town this early in the game. I don't find him overtly scummy (it could be just a difference in play styles) but he's the closest to scum I’ve seen so far. His vote on horrordude felt OMGUS.

Now on the flip side, running a close second to bjc:
Momo – his reason for voting bjc is bad or he’s not paying attention

In post 244, momo wrote:VOTE: bjc0303

It is too early in the game for you to be tunneling LQ.

I personally try to never tunnel as I believe an open mind is key to mafia. Hence, I have very little tolerance for tunneling this early in the game. Try and read other people. The beginning is when you get a general read of everyone. You can go further later on.

bjc’s vote on momo in this case felt right. I could see myself voting momo as well. On first read, I'd guess momo and bjc are not scum buddies. To those who know momo, would he do that to his teammate?

Ms Columbo · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:28 pm

Desully – thought it was odd that he is on page 7 but asks if it’s still RVS, wasn’t it obvious by then?

In post 212, Desully wrote:Hi guys is it still RVS? I'm up to PAGE SEVEN and I'm losing THE WILL TO CONTINUE

In post 221, Desully wrote:
In post 188, FrankJaeger wrote:VOTE: bj
LQ town
Horror lean town
Hans null town
Fart null
Bj scum
Rest are null
Fuck this BS let's kill Frank.. I can't believe this attitude

@Desully – I feel like I missed something here. What attitude?

Franks entrance seemed awkward. His second round and later was better – seemed more like town trying to engage discussion.

Not much on Nero yet. I thought Nero was one of the easier town read’s in the WWE game. Waiting for more from him.

Not sure how to read Fart – null for now

Nothing on the rest yet.

Nero Cain · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:40 pm

In post 260, Ms Columbo wrote:Not much on Nero yet. I thought Nero was one of the easier town read’s in the WWE game. Waiting for more from him.

I was going to pst and then I got sucked into site chat. I'll have something up later.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:44 pm

In post 259, Ms Columbo wrote:My thoughts so far seem most in line with horrordude. Found myself agreeing here:

In post 109, horrordude0215 wrote:
In post 108, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 29, nancy wrote:LQ meh. Cutting RVS short is just killing this game.
Why are there no votes on this?
When this post was made half of the playerlist hadn't even posted yet, and the case presented seemed like a bit of a stretch at best. Trying to push a game out of RVS before it gets there naturally has a tendency to stifle discussion or make everyone in town rehash the same points over and over again.
and here:
In post 161, horrordude0215 wrote: I don't necessarily think that nancy saying a short RVS stifles discussion is scummy, I see it as more of a difference in playstyle than anything.

BJ literally said to powerlynch someone on page 3 (because you were "trying to hard)? While I agree that the initial case was weak, the attempt to get out of RVS early wasn't scummy. BJ implied that you were trying to hard, and has since contributed nothing to the thread.
If I needed to vote right now, it would most likely be bjc. It felt like he was pushing an agenda from the start (to lynch LQ). #195 feels defensive. I wouldn’t expect that from town this early in the game. I don't find him overtly scummy (it could be just a difference in play styles) but he's the closest to scum I’ve seen so far. His vote on horrordude felt OMGUS.

Now on the flip side, running a close second to bjc:
Momo – his reason for voting bjc is bad or he’s not paying attention

In post 244, momo wrote:VOTE: bjc0303

It is too early in the game for you to be tunneling LQ.

I personally try to never tunnel as I believe an open mind is key to mafia. Hence, I have very little tolerance for tunneling this early in the game. Try and read other people. The beginning is when you get a general read of everyone. You can go further later on.
bjc’s vote on momo in this case felt right. I could see myself voting momo as well. On first read, I'd guess momo and bjc are not scum buddies. To those who know momo, would he do that to his teammate?

Aggreement =/= Town

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:49 pm

In post 261, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 260, Ms Columbo wrote:Not much on Nero yet. I thought Nero was one of the easier town read’s in the WWE game. Waiting for more from him.
I was going to pst and then I got sucked into site chat. I'll have something up later.

Your ISO is shit Nero :p

Nero Cain · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:58 pm

Why the smiley?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:00 am

In post 264, Nero Cain wrote:Why the smiley?

Because you've done nothing so far this game.

Nero Cain · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:14 am

I disagree. I voted my top scumread but if you felt like I had done nothing and that my "iso was shit" why add on a smiley at the end like you were trying to pass is off as a joke?

Nero Cain · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:23 am

also why is Horror town?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:23 am

In post 172, FrankJaeger wrote:
In post 67, bjc0303 wrote:
In post 64, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 60, bjc0303 wrote:Can we just power lynch LQ already?

In post 62, Superhans wrote:
In post 60, bjc0303 wrote:Can we just power lynch LQ already?
Too tempting rn
What have I done that is Scummy? Serious question here guys.
Better you than me buddeh
Oh thats why u wanna PL him. No need to go into the details then.

Does anyone else think this post feels fake?

Going to:

VOTE: Horror

seems reasonable, but some things seem to be misinterpretations.

P-Edit

Me and Nero agree on this, it seems

Nero Cain · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:26 am

Nero Cain · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:27 am

"your ISO is shit Nero"

"but I agree with your points"

unvote

I need to think about this

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:29 am

In post 135, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 131, Fart wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:Farts lulzy WIFOM type play is annoying.
real post: I'll calm down when the time is right I swear
btw, why respond to this but not my other part about you?

What other part about him?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:30 am

In post 270, Nero Cain wrote:"your ISO is shit Nero"

"but I agree with your points"

unvote

I need to think about this

I don't remember you making actual points, just accusing someone of Scum. There's a difference. I provided my rational.

Nero Cain · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:38 am

In post 271, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 135, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 131, Fart wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:Farts lulzy WIFOM type play is annoying.
real post: I'll calm down when the time is right I swear
btw, why respond to this but not my other part about you?
What other part about him?

I asked him what he liked about the Hans case.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:42 am

In post 273, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 271, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 135, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 131, Fart wrote:
In post 129, Nero Cain wrote:Farts lulzy WIFOM type play is annoying.
real post: I'll calm down when the time is right I swear
btw, why respond to this but not my other part about you?
What other part about him?
I asked him what he liked about the Hans case.

Didn't see that part of the post, only saw what applied to me.