In post 1678, Trivium wrote: In post 1661, gerryoat wrote: In post 1655, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:hmmm..... I am not sure why we are wanting to lynch Dark/ Contradiction. I read Darks ISO and as far as I can tell Darks play is pretty blah,,,,,, I don't really see why we should read him either way other than he is pretty much trolling this game.
Maybe someone can give me a better grip why we should lynch Contradiction. On a side note I generally have a rule not to lynch a replace in until they have at least 1 day to get caught the exception being if the player slot is super scummy or has been pinged by an
investigation role. Right now I am not that up on lynching this slot.
Vig this when contradiction flips scum
Something I can agree with here. This stands out as mafia protecting mafia, Fuzzy has no reason to be protective here, but he is.
You are assuming that a) Dark/Con is scum b) I am scum and scum buddies with Con and c I am trying to protect him. None of these are correct. As I said I read Darks ISO and went blah,,,,,,, He could be scum but what I saw
I could not get a good read on him, Tell me why asking why he is being scum read is scummy as oppose to town just trying to figure things out as I am trying to do.
In post 1679, Trivium wrote: In post 1665, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote: In post 1661, gerryoat wrote: In post 1655, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:hmmm..... I am not sure why we are wanting to lynch Dark/ Contradiction. I read Darks ISO and as far as I can tell Darks play is pretty blah,,,,,, I don't really see why we should read him either way other than he is pretty much trolling this game.
Maybe someone can give me a better grip why we should lynch Contradiction. On a side note I generally have a rule not to lynch a replace in until they have at least 1 day to get caught the exception being if the player slot is super scummy or has been pinged by an
investigation role. Right now I am not that up on lynching this slot.
Vig this when contradiction flips scum
So do we get to vig you if Con flips town???????
Honestly I hate it when people ask for a person to be vigged,,,,,, I find it scummy as they want a person dead but at not willing to place a vote on a person. Can you tell me why this is a town quote,,,,,,
OH BOY. Yeah, finding stuff scummy that happens to support himself.
Huh????? Calling for a vig is scummy bc its allows a person to call for a player death without being held accountable. In my book votes are important so asking to vig a person so you don't have to be accountable if a player
flips town is a scummy play. It is equivalent to scum reading someone but not willing to vote for them in my book
In post 1681, Trivium wrote:
Actually even the fact that you questioned momo here is scummy. Even I'm perceptive enough not to bother pressuring momo, this feels like you're leading into something I'm not comfortable with.
Am I suppose to take this serious?????????