Mini Normal 1897: Chocolate Mafia - Game Over
-
-
rb Survivor
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
-
-
rb
-
-
rb Survivor
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
ahahaha hey dood
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
No u rIn post 35, TwoFace wrote:
That's stupidIn post 26, rb wrote:TB's statement seems that he more is just appearing to believe because someone else said they did, when I would have expected him to first ask why the first person believed so I'm asking him why he didn't-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
-
-
rb Survivor
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
is not making sense a scum trait?In post 48, ThinkBig wrote:20 - arongrundy believes the miller claim
21- So do I
22 - Policy lynch claimed miller
23 - Votes ThinkBig instead for believing the claim
This literally makes no sense at all. I believe the miller claim because at this point, there is no real reason not to believe it. I've seen scum fake claim miller; however I don't think I have ever seen scum fake claim miller in their first post during RVS.In post 26, rb wrote:TB's statement seems that he more is just appearing to believe because someone else said they did, when I would have expected him to first ask why the first person believed so I'm asking him why he didn't
UNVOTE: aronagrundy
VOTE: rb-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Okay so something about TB is off here.
He says I'm not making sense but not making sense isn't really a scum trait as I understand it. In fact, scum usually try to make sense. Not that making sense is a scum trait, these two things are just not really related to alivgnment that strongly
BUT, TB votes me for it. Why? If someone doesn't make sense to you and ypu're town, what do you do? Usually, town try to understand first or if they think something is scummy they point it out. TB's motivation here doesn't seem town, it seems forced and scummy because he's trying to pin a vote on me for more than pointless RVS reasons, but hasn't really expressed anything more convincing than "that didnt make sense".
VOTE: ThinkBig-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
wow ur slow, we aren't lynching transcendIn post 154, TwoFace wrote:
He wasn't and it absolutely doesn't mean that.In post 146, Eddie Cane wrote:the fact transcend is l-1 already means he's probably town
He needs rope-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
take off the tinfoil hatIn post 173, Boonskiies wrote:
That is EXACTLY what scum would say here. Of course we should wait, and annoyingly, you'll probably get away with it.In post 171, Transcend wrote:Sure
But if town knows what's good they should unvote
I'll give full thoughts after work-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
i know ur bad at the game so I'll give you some leway - please outline why i'm one of your top SR's (so I can outline how poor the basis of your read is)In post 222, ThinkBig wrote:
Why? He is one of my top SR's right nowIn post 213, eagerSnake wrote:If you're reading my ISO I'm putting this here to remind younot ever ever ever lynch rb before d4-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
^ this post is full of shit.In post 260, ThinkBig wrote:
Yeah. BlackVoid and I share the same home site. Our home site both uses tons of power roles and is often swingy with the set up.In post 254, Boonskiies wrote:Like I said, I'm positive this is an investigation heavy setup. At this point, I'm pretty sure there are investigation roles on both sides. I was in a game that had scum and town gunsmiths alongside backup gunsmiths for both sides.
With that said, a miller makes sense in a power rich environment. That's how it looks so far and that's why I believe the claim.
TB "believed the claim" on page 1. This is before we knew anything about a "power rich environment"
Now in this post on page 12, he says the reason he believes the claim is that it looks like a "power rich environment".
If he was town, how did he know it was a power rich environment - LESS THAN 25 POSTS INTO THE GAME.
Lynch with extreme prejudice-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
I've already addressed 48 - to which you have not responded.In post 293, ThinkBig wrote:
Well we can start with post 48. Oh, and nice insult.In post 292, rb wrote:i know ur bad at the game so I'll give you some leway - please outline why i'm one of your top SR's (so I can outline how poor the basis of your read is)
Is not making sense a scum trait?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
So clarify the following for me:In post 310, ThinkBig wrote:On our homesite, on almost every game there is a godfather+cop+miller. Obviously godfathers are blacklisted here, but millers aren't.
- why did your meta with Blackvoid/homesite meta not get mentioned on page 1?
- seeing as your perceptions on the believability of the claim are based on your personal experiences and meta on specific people, why would you assume someone who doesn't have the same experiences or meta on those specific people is scummy?
- when the original person who believed the claim mentioned as such, did you not think, "i know i believe it, but why do THEY?" - is the fsct that you agree with them but disagreed with me the reason you town and scumread us two respectively? If so, that's a very bad way to scum or townread someone
- the reason I scumread you is essentially the culmination of the above 3 points. Reiterated:
- no accounting for the experiences of other players, simply a desire to utilize this situation to force a scum or townread
- no curiosity over why someone might not believe
- inconsistency in stated reasons as to why you believed the claim. Sure those reasons makes sense that the miller claim is realistic, but it doesn't make sense that you'd assume other people have these se experiences/reasons to believe it, and are therefore scum for being skeptical
Level of irritability seems unreasonable and faked.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
but how do you know he's miller?In post 320, Boonskiies wrote:because I go into every game and try to outguess the mod before the game starts.
do you think Smart is scum trying to coast on a Day 1 miller claim? What would you have preferred he do as a miller?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
TIL that typing "I have meta on Blackvoid" is an acceptable submission for my Ph.D. dissertation.In post 323, ThinkBig wrote:
Does it really have to? It's page fucking 1 during RVS. Do I really need to type up a Ph.D. dissertation as to why I believe Something_smart's page 1 miller claim?In post 319, rb wrote:So clarify the following for me:
- why did your meta with Blackvoid/homesite meta not get mentioned on page 1?
makes my life so much easier actually, thought i was going to have to write a thesis of something
and as a counterpoint - are you not also expecting an unreasonable level of justification as to why Ibelieve the miller claim then? Why the double standards?wouldn't-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Why are Boonskiies and yourself defending and answering for one another?In post 328, ThinkBig wrote:
Neither Boonskiies nor I ever said that weIn post 324, rb wrote:
but how do you know he's miller?In post 320, Boonskiies wrote:because I go into every game and try to outguess the mod before the game starts.
do you think Smart is scum trying to coast on a Day 1 miller claim? What would you have preferred he do as a miller?knowhe is a miller. I said I believed his claim. That's a world of difference.
On that note, can you please do something else as well eagerSnake?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Which part is a deadend?In post 333, Boonskiies wrote:In post 329, eagerSnake wrote:Still see nothing that explains why tb thinks he's so scummy
I agree with that sentiment, but take TB out of the equation. I understand where they are both coming from, but like I said...they both have deadend cases.
Obviously, you don't understand what I'm pointing out in that case. If you think that the important point here is about whether or not TB believes he's a miller, then you're wrong. It's completely irrelevant to me whether someone's conclusion is that SS is a miller or not a miller.
What's very relevant is that when aronagrundy said, "I believe the miller claim" - it seems to me that the very first town reaction would be, "why do you believe the miller claim?" - even if I had good reasons myself to believe it, I'd want to know why arona believed it, and to see if they could give a good reason because if we don't question why people think certain things, and simply scum or townread people on the basis of whether they agree with us or not...well that's some pretty shitty mafia playing right there.
TB's lack of apparent town curiosity, and seeming lack of ability to understand that this is the relevant point being made (not whether or not he simply believes the claim or not) is what should raise red flags for a town player in the early game.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
ur also slow, we aren't lynching transcend
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
it's more to do with: what's the point of a miller if there's a Watcher? Normally a miller would be paired with a cop, but we don't necessarily have a cop yet. Miller could also be a fake flag, and maybe there's not a cop or an investigative, but it looks like there IS an investigative and it's a Watcher - so why a miller?In post 343, ThinkBig wrote:
This makes no sense at all. A miller doesn't visit anyone, so why wouldn't a miller go with a cop+watcher+backup watcher?In post 337, eagerSnake wrote:Because I don't see miller with watcher and backup watcher
So far we have:
Something_smart (miller)
EagerSnake (backup watcher)
Unknown player (watcher)
Transcend (some sort of investigative role)
I'm pretty confident one of these is scum.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
But I thought you thought Transcend was scum? So how would he be 'basically confirmed investigative' in your eyes?In post 354, Boonskiies wrote:@Rb - there's basically been a confirmed 3 investigative roles in this game, and I'm pretty sure there are more. are you even reading the thread?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
We have a backup watcher, which means there's probably a watcher. Then the other one is probably Transcend - who you've been saying is likely to be scum, but if you think he's scum, how come you think there's 3 'basically confirmed' investigative roles? That doesn't make sense? It should still be 2 in your eyes if you thought Transcend was probably scum.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Miller is anti-town utility, which is completely unrelated to Watcher (it gives nothing to a Watcher) - so if we know there's a Watcher, and then you think Transcend is scum utility - there's still no investigative role that hints at being relevant to there being a Miller. Essentially you're trusting that such a thing would exist, or perhaps that the existence of a Miller is a 'fuck you' to the players to go looking for a cop and make them setup spec a lot. But the information and reasoning you're giving about why you believe the claim, isn't saying any of those things. Why?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Why? Because you disagree?In post 362, Something_Smart wrote:I'm not trying to paint you as scum, I just have a hard time seeing your reasoning as coming from town.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Why?In post 361, Boonskiies wrote:
well, at this point, I'm pretty sure he's a mafia watcher, despite whatever he is going to claim.In post 359, rb wrote:So how would a town miller be more likely to be true based on Transcend being a scum investigative role?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
also getting around to TF: why's that stupid? a lack of interest in other people's motives and reasoning, with an attitude more focused on people's end conclusions, is how scum play - because people are more likely to think someone is town when they share conclusions than if they don't.In post 35, TwoFace wrote:
That's stupidIn post 26, rb wrote:TB's statement seems that he more is just appearing to believe because someone else said they did, when I would have expected him to first ask why the first person believed so I'm asking him why he didn't-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
if you're town please replace out, I'd like to not lose IQ points having to try and cooperate with you
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
I like to lynch miller claims on day2, far from lylo, but let them do and say whatever they want on day1 + 2 and then their flip on end of day2 becomes really informative for the rest of the game.In post 372, eagerSnake wrote:
Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?
It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
might be right too, and statistically towns win more often when you lynch town on day1 - and letting a miller claim anywhere near lylo is just retarded.In post 379, Something_Smart wrote:
Because you might be wrongIn post 372, eagerSnake wrote:
Why don't you lynch it D1 exactly? What is the utility in keeping it alive even if you disbelieve it?
It's not invalid to disbelieve it, no. But even if you don't believe the claim, you don't lynch it D1 unless you REALLY don't believe it, and your reasoning for that is faulty (and intentionally obstinate, might I add).In post 366, eagerSnake wrote:I mean it's not invalid as a backup watcher to disbelieve a miller claim in a 10v3 normal.
I prefer doing it on day2, but it's no big loss to do it on day1 either.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
explaining things and interacting with people is scummy?In post 382, Boonskiies wrote:a combination of all your posts.
Scum usually need to hear cases on them more than town anyways. Scum also fabricate and explain cases more than town does.
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
if you're town, then you can probably outline how i'm playing badlyIn post 384, Boonskiies wrote:like if rb is town, he's playing really badly. I like to think he isn't that bad of a player.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
in what way am I tunneling?In post 392, Boonskiies wrote:And you constantly need to be reassured of all reasons why you are scum. Just read the damn game and you'll see why people are scum reading you. Look at it from the other side and stop being a tunnel fuck.
i'm commenting on the major wagons and trying to get my top scumread lynched - is this bad?
what's the "shrug it off" tactic? where am I discrediting you?
is asking questions discrediting?-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
so my scumreads should be influenced by who's easiest to lynch?In post 402, Boonskiies wrote:TB isn't a major wagon. You're the only one voting there.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
lmao, evidence plsIn post 407, Boonskiies wrote:I get someone saying they are worried about me if I'm town literally every game. I usually win.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
where am i 'role phishing'In post 408, Boonskiies wrote:In post 406, eagerSnake wrote:
Tbf I don't see the case either. If I was rb I'd be asking for it too. Hell, I'm not rb and I have been asking for it and you even basically said you didn't see it either by saying tbs case on him was dead-endIn post 392, Boonskiies wrote:And you constantly need to be reassured of all reasons why you are scum. Just read the damn game and you'll see why people are scum reading you. Look at it from the other side and stop being a tunnel fuck.
I didn't scum read him based on TB's case. that was a dead end case. both of theirs were. rb is role phishing, and is trying to discredit any potential claim. Keep in mind, I scum read Transcend as well. See it from that perspective.
you're actually warped-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
where did i say i was pushing the major wagons? i want you to find that, because you can'tIn post 409, Boonskiies wrote:
see, this is a redirect of what I said. I commented that in response to him saying he's pushing the major wagons. This is his way of discrediting what I said even though he blatantly took it out of context.In post 404, rb wrote:
so my scumreads should be influenced by who's easiest to lynch?In post 402, Boonskiies wrote:TB isn't a major wagon. You're the only one voting there.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
please find where i said i don't believe the miller claim - again, you can'tIn post 416, Boonskiies wrote:The biggest thing about rb is he says he doesn't believe the miller claim, yet not voting Smart.-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
Clearly says: I'mrb wrote:i'm commenting on the major wagons and trying to get my top scumread lynched - is this bad?commentingon the major wagons andtrying to get my top scumreadlynched.
Where do I claim to be pushing the major wagons?
In fact where do I even use the word 'pushing'.
Just look at this lying scumfuck get more and more desperate and make up more and more bullshit-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
yeah like i said on page fucking 2, just play the game and policy lynch him D2. derpIn post 434, eagerSnake wrote:I think the best thing to do is just table it until d2 when we have a couple flips to work off-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-
-
rb Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12029
- Joined: June 13, 2016
- Location: sp00ky
-