Open 680.1 C9++ | Endgame

ThinkBig · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:08 pm

VC 1.8

Official Vote Count

CommKnight

(3): Green Crayons, Umlaut, FireScreamer

Titus

(2): Brian Skies, davesaz

FireScreamer

(2): FrankJaeger, CommKnight

Alchemist21

(1): RoryMK

FrankJaeger

(1): shannon

Umlaut

(1): Narna

shannon

(1): Titus

Not Voting

(2): Alchemist21, Necta

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline

: (expired on 2017-05-03 20:06:48)

Mod NoteLlamaFluff has ruled that no rules have been broken in regards to trust tells. However, "If a player is convinced a rule is broken, have them report the post and the mod team will take a more in depth look at it."

This is your friendly reminder that all site rules apply and I won't hesitate to modkill or replace you for violating them. I take my games and the rules seriously.

Umlaut · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:15 pm

In post 324, shannon wrote:Be good and post lots x

Aaaaand everyone stops posting

Brian Skies · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:38 pm

Maybe we should quicklynch Necta so ThinkBig doesn't have to look for his replacement.

Umlaut · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:52 pm

Real talk, I consider that every time someone with a wagon gets replaced.

Brian Skies · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:58 pm

He's never had a wagon.

Umlaut · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:05 pm

He was definitely at the top of the VC at some point because I was wondering why we were wagoning someone who hadn't posted yet.

Umlaut · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:08 pm

VC 1.5 I guess it was mostly RVS votes though.

Brian Skies · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:27 pm

Idk how I missed that. I just assumed people only put like one vote or so on Necta.

Green Crayons · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:35 pm

In post 310, Umlaut wrote:If you're insinuating something here you should spell it out instead of just eye-rolling.

Are you stating that you don't understand what the insinuation is, or that you don't know whether there is an insinuation?

-----

In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:It's not punishable to just say 'I would never do this as scum.'

In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:What FS is saying is that he cannot be scum here because he did something only a town him would do

These are literally saying the same thing. "never scum" = "only town".

-----

In post 321, CommKnight wrote:Back when I was going on about the probability numbers, you guys are soo worried I won't lynch into two other people (and myself included).

In post 321, CommKnight wrote:You should want to sort EVERYONE

Mhm. Mhm.

Brian Skies · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:53 pm

In post 333, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:It's not punishable to just say 'I would never do this as scum.'

In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:What FS is saying is that he cannot be scum here because he did something only a town him would do
These are literally saying the same thing. "never scum" = "only town".

No, they aren't.

Are you really going to nitpick over me explaining what a trust tell is?

Umlaut · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 5:56 pm

In post 333, Green Crayons wrote:Are you stating that you don't understand what the insinuation is, or that you don't know whether there is an insinuation?

Either you think one or both of us is handing out townreads too freely, you think one of us may be trying to buddy the other, or you just really like Pulp Fiction and wanted to post that video.

If there is an insinuation I don't like the vague eye-rolling expression of it because it's just shade and doesn't actually help improve your reads or advance a point.

RoryMK · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:46 pm

I'm going to start townreading Brian Skies. I have a feeling he will eventually catch scum or get killed. Good enough reason for now.

VOTE: Comm

I approve of this wagon.

RoryMK · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:46 pm

Comm: can I get some reads out of you?

shannon · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Fri Apr 21, 2017 10:34 pm

In post 305, Titus wrote:
In post 303, Umlaut wrote:
In post 297, Titus wrote:Can we slow down? I do has work and other games? Is shannon lynched yet?
I just counted and you have 180 new posts on the site in the past 24 hours, 3 of which are in this thread. "I do has work and other games" just isn't enough to account for that kind of discrepancy.

Honestly I'm not as ready as some people are to scumread you for this. While I've never met scum!Titus, I've heard she's pretty crafty, so I don't believe she has a tell this blatant. But... what gives?
Trying to find gems in crap is insane. I just know shannon's scum.

Like whowver else has 3 votes prolly town too

Nope, we're still not lynching me. Sorry not sorry.

In post 312, Umlaut wrote:"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

You aren't offering evidence that Shannon is scum, so I'm going to dismiss that read.

In post 319, Umlaut wrote:If I ask
"What makes you so sure of X?"
and you answer
"Well of course I don't
know
X 100%, no one can be 100% sure of anything except scum, I don't have to be 100% sure just to say what I think"
then you haven't actually told me why you're so sure of X, you've just evaded the question.

In post 317, CommKnight wrote:You're asking me how I know someone in last game's town bloc is definite scum. Well it can never be 100% we could all be town this game and it could be a game full of lurker scum allowing the town to go at each other. However, that is counter intuitive. I see FS postings as off. Even if only slightly. I can't point at something and be like "Ah ha, he's 100% scum, let's lynch him". I can only state that his reaction thus far hasn't been quite what I'd expect from him as town again.
This still doesn't explain anything. You're saying
You think someone in the townbloc is scum, because you think it's unlikely that no one in the townbloc is scum, because that would mean no one in the townbloc is scum.

You think FS is scummy, because his posts are off, because he's not acting like town.
You're not explaining anything.

Umlaut for King of Town. Unfortunately I think Comm is town too.

RoryMK · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:21 am

Why is that shannon?

Green Crayons · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:25 am

In post 334, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 333, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:It's not punishable to just say 'I would never do this as scum.'

In post 313, Brian Skies wrote:What FS is saying is that he cannot be scum here because he did something only a town him would do
These are literally saying the same thing. "never scum" = "only town".
No, they aren't.

Are you really going to nitpick over me explaining what a trust tell is?

Are you really going to pretend that criticizing another player's non-bannable attempt to clear themselves with the specter of a ban in the game thread itself, itself of taking the issue up with the mod via PM, is not suspicious?

Green Crayons · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:26 am

In post 335, Umlaut wrote:
In post 333, Green Crayons wrote:Are you stating that you don't understand what the insinuation is, or that you don't know whether there is an insinuation?
Either you think one or both of us is handing out townreads too freely, you think one of us may be trying to buddy the other, or you just really like Pulp Fiction and wanted to post that video.

If there is an insinuation I don't like the vague eye-rolling expression of it because it's just shade and doesn't actually help improve your reads or advance a point.

Well you got the correct message so my method of communication appears to be a success

Green Crayons · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 1:31 am

In post 311, Titus wrote:*shrug* the votes talk to me.

There is no good case d1.

So there's no reason for you to not join literally any other bandwagon that actually has votes (including the largest), so you can get to your vote count analysis?

Umlaut · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:39 am

In post 338, shannon wrote:Umlaut for King of Town. Unfortunately I think Comm is town too.

Why is this? (About Comm, though I guess I wonder why I'm town too)

Titus · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:27 am

In post 342, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 311, Titus wrote:*shrug* the votes talk to me.

There is no good case d1.
So there's no reason for you to not join literally any other bandwagon that actually has votes (including the largest), so you can get to your vote count analysis?

Vca gives me info about players in relation to each other. I see a bunch of white letters on black paper.

ThinkBig · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:20 am

Mod NoteLooking for a replacement for Necta who failed to pick up his prod.

FrankJaeger · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:43 am

Rorys posts look disingenuous.

davesaz · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:07 am

Shannon, why so concerned about one vote? Especially from someone who isn't doing anything else?

davesaz · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:08 am

In post 346, FrankJaeger wrote:Rorys posts look disingenuous.

Anything in particular makes you say this?

davesaz · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:11 am

In post 341, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 335, Umlaut wrote:
In post 333, Green Crayons wrote:Are you stating that you don't understand what the insinuation is, or that you don't know whether there is an insinuation?
Either you think one or both of us is handing out townreads too freely, you think one of us may be trying to buddy the other, or you just really like Pulp Fiction and wanted to post that video.

If there is an insinuation I don't like the vague eye-rolling expression of it because it's just shade and doesn't actually help improve your reads or advance a point.
Well you got the correct message so my method of communication appears to be a success

Several potential messages were mentioned.