At any rate, I feel I had a worthwhile contribution there to steer the lynch where it needed to go. If JJ is scum as well, of course none of this matters....but im pretty pretty sure he is not at this point.
Spoiler:
In post 4309, Vecna wrote:Lets just lynch this, and see what the night brings. I agree this shit needs to end, and getting rid of a total lurker over this ffj guy seems like a much better idea since im nowhere near convinced he's scum. Night actions should make a lot of stuff clear.
I actually really like Titus' gambit here since it brings a lot of options.
Either she's completely bullshitting to test whether Dunn is scum......or she's completely bullshitting because she's scum with dunn......or she's town that is doing something interesting meaning either dunn or Titus is about to die.
I can only see good things coming off this and im quite exciting.
Especially since its hood-scheming time with dunnstral.
In post 4375, Vecna wrote:the same applies to you btw Titus, I really couldnt give less of a shit who we lynch in bella/shiqf/jj since my reads on all 3 basically default to the same thing. The only difference is that JJ talks more.
This is your little theory testing-day, so make it count.
In post 4396, Vecna wrote:A titus lynch today is completely off the table.
A dunn lynch today is completely off the table.
Were testing that Titus theory today.
Id prefer to lynch in S / JJ since theyre the most controversial and best information lynches, and I do have some faith in Frogger's ability to read that slot (allthough if youre hell-bent ill sheep you there as well).
In post 4399, Vecna wrote:Well, S clearly isnt a good information lynch - that came out kind of wrong.
In post 4404, Vecna wrote:At any rate, recent events are giving me a very low tolerance for lurkers and I have no problem whatsoever getting rid of them early on.
In post 4486, Vecna wrote:Why are you opposing this one so much?
You were townreading me before, but you actually had no problem lynching me just to end the day......yet here youre suddenly very much against it and opposing it.
R U SCUM M8?
In post 4489, Vecna wrote:Transcend actually has a strong meta on the other website where I play with him to defend his teammates, fyi.
He will -very often- try some gimmick to save them.
After he was townreading me and not having any problems lynching me, this looks freakishly suspicious.
In post 4508, Vecna wrote:this doesnt sound like something scum would post btw.In post 4446, jjh927 wrote:Would you settle for my non-active half or is it all-or-nothing?
Even though Transcend is acting extremely shady here, I think we should settle for S (who just beetlejuiced as well).
In post 4515, Vecna wrote:Good. Go on titus tonight.In post 4472, jjh927 wrote:I'm a modified enabler limited motion detector bonded not-telling-you-that-bit.
And I withheld a bit of information regarding my negative utility because it would tell people who I'm using my action on. If I'm voting someone at the end of the day, I am allowed to target them with my night action. Out of a bond, I'm a motion detector and get told if my target acted or was acted on that night. But I am not going to reveal my bonded action unless I really have to.
In post 4522, Vecna wrote:ROFL, you did -NOT- just say thatIn post 4485, Eddiebyte wrote:motion detector is pretty close to useless in role madness anywyas
In post 4528, Vecna wrote:In my role pm, the enabling part means I need to do something (compose my music for a night) while passive in a bond, before I can use my night-talking activator.In post 4488, Fro99er wrote:an enabler usually enables roles else that other people have
this doesn't add up
you can't enable yourself
In post 4534, Vecna wrote:.....Im getting these scumpings againIn post 4529, Titus wrote:Whatever. Just get a fucking wagon not on obvious town or Dunn. I am checked out of this day. The fact jj isn't fullclaiming says volumes.
In post 4550, Vecna wrote:Ok here's my plan:
Mechanically we need to make it so that scum cannot predict our moves. Theres a lot of information in the open, but we can still be unpredictable.
I need another person that can be passive. What we need is that JJ can choose for himself whether he bonds with that person or not. This way scum do not know whether he will motion detect, or use his other hidden ability. That way theres no predicting for them how to act. Ill instruct dunnstral in a similair manner. DUNNSTRAL, YOU HEREBY HAVE THE OPTION AS WELL TO CANCEL YOUR BOND TO ME, SO YOU CAN TAKE YOUR TRACKER. this way we have a ton of options and scum cannot predict it.
The combination of proper power use here is gonna flush out a lot of truth.
In post 4554, Vecna wrote:Alisae, trust my judgement here - the wording & his claim match.In post 4548, Alisae wrote:Frog, the wording in my role pm is really different then jjh's, but I'm thinking here it suggests that jjh is fakeclaiming. I am going to out this. I am unspeakably bounded, so I'm checking in with who I am bonded with to know if I am going to fullclaim cc or not, but I also want to point out this.
jjh's claim: modified enabler limited motion detector bonded not-telling-you-that-bit.
TB's claim: Modified Bond Passively Bonded Self-Enabling Disabled Night-Talk Enabler
Doesn't jjh's wording strike you as off?
Its done the exact same way as mine. Its not completely AI obviously, but the way in which he went about his claim and refusing to full - claim and being so resistant to claiming - screams town to me.
In post 4582, Vecna wrote:This is eddie isnt it?In post 4577, Eddiebyte wrote:hey frog and vecna if you're going to shout at me wht not actually tell me what motion detector is supposed to do
The ammount of fake-claims that role can detect if used properly is astounding. Granted, itll likely be a while since it really shines when were getting to a lower player number - and scum will probably NK the slot long before it, but there are so many possibilities to put that role to good use in such a setting.
In post 4619, Vecna wrote:Not -quite- sure this is the right call frogger.In post 4549, Fro99er wrote:Vecna, since we're not lynching in the Titus/Dunn/Heartless thing, let's do Transcend
I still think S is an interesting option. I wanna know if it flips scum, because I have a sensation that a lot of people need to be awakened to the possibility of giga being scum here.
I really feel Giga has been pushing on people for very weird reasoning.
It applies to me, it applies to JJ.....maybe not so much to Dunn.
Then they were defending S, and trying to force the issue on JJ.