It's something I've wondered about a little too.In post 642, GinghamDog wrote:I think that's because there's some paranoia surrounding WHY the other two wagons disbanded. I keep wondering if we've been corralled into a mislynch.In post 639, podoboq wrote:The massive wagon seems to be getting a lot of resistance, just not in the form of "this wagon is stupid, don't join it." It's mostly "I could vote there, but SS and/or Chickadee are better wagons."
Now, I've set Chicka aside because I accepted that everything I find wrong with her play can be boiled down to a very consistent and specific set of personality traits. With that in mind, I can easily reframe everything I've taken issue with as NAI. Since I'm one of the few people to actually create a case against her, despite a substantial wagon, I think it's safe to guess that there were some opportunistic votes on her along the way. I'm not even going to say with confidence that she's town. Only, I haven't found any decent evidence that she's scum.
One thing I did find curious, is that while people certainly made decisions about whether they agreed more with Chicka or me, most people concluded it was TvT. Scum normally use those tiffs to take sides (or pretend that they don't want to get involved and use it as an excuse to not read anyone). Scum rarely pronounce it TvT. In fact, I think the only person to really take a side with a vote is GuiltyLion, and he documented his decision-making process to include other observations as well. I don't know how to interpret all that, but I felt it worth noting.
As to Snarky, I'd still be voting him/her if not for the podoboq. I've hard townread him/her before with far less activity. He/she made it super obvious (to me) that he/she was town last time. I'm not seeing it right now. I'm not even sure I totally trust podoboq. I just want to see what happens from this because I think it will be helpful in solving the game.
