Greasy wrote:You fell right the trap set by PEG. You didn't even stumble, practically fell jumped right in. An experienced player as yourself and you didn't see that? Or maybe that was a good reason for you to start a wagon without looking too scummy.
I don't know what trap you're talking about, but I'm just quoting this to note that you're expressing suspicions of angelmouse.
Greasy wrote:You state the scum would know I was town and not vote for me to make themselves look better. Well I say the scum see me as an easy lynch and have jumped on board. So your logic can go both ways so it doesn't prove anything.
I wrote:The scum would know you're town and
could just as easily
not be voting for you in order to look better.
No, exactly, it can go both ways. That's what I was saying. I was using this to disprove your logic to the contrary ("everyone voting for me must be scum")
I wrote:Greasy Spot wrote:Ok, maybe "All" was a strong word to use, but I do believe you and Cephrir are.
Me, because I was last, right? In that case, why shaka? As far as I can see, it's because he's the one calling you out on this. Shaka has since explained his reasoning, so why him as opposed to CFK?
shaka!! wrote:Greasy Spot wrote:Ok, maybe "All" was a strong word to use, but I do believe you and Cephrir are.
So why us?
Still didn't answer these two. Probably because your suspicions are totally arbitrary and make no sense and/or because they're faked to back up previous craplogic.
Greasy wrote:Worse yet you didn't even try to hide the fact you were following your scum buddy.
There you go with the everyone's scum thing again. I suppose four scum is possible, but only if one is the SK. It's pretty unlikely at that. And five, counting angelmouse? Yeah, no. You already retracted a previous statement that five people were scum and now you feel like doing some more of that, apparently... Also, stop basing your suspicions entirely on OMGUS.
Your post really doesn't do much for me. How about that claim?