idk, like, most of his game stuff. the game i played he was all over the top and excited to give any read about a person ever and he isn't that. i guess it's not exactly tone (he's still, like, putting exclamation points and putting individual words in caps and usingIn post 497, Socrates wrote:Schadd_, your AC read seems very thin. Where are you deriving this tone-read from?
) but more presentation and habit as a whole
yesIn post 498, Socrates wrote:And Schadd, when you say 'lul town' that means you townread that person for that statement, correct?
i'm rubber ur glueIn post 499, Vegito wrote:So Schadd has resorted to trollposting. I suppose that's what happens when someone calls you out on being scum D1 and you have no actual defense.
This doesn't really address my concern, though. If there was another compelling reason for how you talked about that read then sure, but I'm not seeing one. Your tone altogether is quite a bit different this game than in prior ones with me and I think you know that.In post 452, Vegito wrote:Your observation on why I talk about reads the way I do is a very strong an accurate one; how I talk about them is not quite accurate but I'm not sure if our games together demonstrate differently.
Wasn't so much a depth issue as much as reading it and thinking "His heart's not really in this" or "These are just bland." If I had to pick one specific example, it'd be this one:In post 454, Vegito wrote:Which reads in that wall do you feel were lacking my usual depth?In post 419, Prism wrote:Concur on Nacho to an extent. Some of the posts-particularly that one wall of reads-tried, but in general I get the same feeling.
This just doesn't read like a legitimate attempt to sort to me. It's kind of like "Oh that's odd, maybe he's scum, maybe not, it's worth looking into, except it's not the type of thing you can look that much into, HMMMMMM let me stick my head on my fist and pose thoughtfully"In post 297, Vegito wrote:I don't remember schadd before the Majiffy vote (except for him being absolutely hilarious) but I didn't really like him asking Majiffy's preferred alignment in response to it. Admittedly it'd be bizarre as shit for scum to do as well (because if that's all he can come up with then lol) but it's the type of thing that begs looking into.
In post 314, Vegito wrote:Looks like he's hiding behind his PR to avoid meaningfully contributing. Also a lot of his posts are just padded fluff to keep his presence up while he has nothing of merit to say.
Plus going after Socrates pings here.
This is a knock on both her and Vegito. I looked at Schadd's ISO, and I don't agree at all. He's keeping some short responses at times but he's clearly focused on the game from #102 on.In post 315, PiggyGal15 wrote:Reading him over, I agree with Vegito's assessment of schadd, VOTE: schadd
#480 is painfully lazy, particularly with the "oh yeah I'd still rather get schadd". I'd love to hear her actually try and give an argument for why schadd is scum that isn't a copy paste. I don't really buy the "oh I get where both are coming from but still Chim is gut scummy" piece.In post 332, PiggyGal15 wrote:I mean, you could still call us all butts anywayIn post 323, Shadoweh wrote:Hello friends, I'm very disappointed right now because I was hoping I had to call you all butts or something. I suppose I should read the rules so I don't get modkilled today.
Both but mainly the formerIn post 503, Aristophanes wrote:Alright, I gotta read up obviously. What's the reason for the __schadd wagon?
DD, are you advocating a Piggy wagon based on a scumread or as a counter to schadd?
WatIn post 507, Prism wrote:I don't even think it points to her being scum, because it'd point to me as her partner
She's scum vote her you're welcomeIn post 507, Prism wrote:I'm having a really hard time parsing her for alignment, so if anyone else wants to pitch in feel free to help out.
Why aren't you asking us to vote piggy? We are the only slot not currently voting.In post 502, Deadline Delivery wrote:schadd vote piggy
ok mom VOTE: piggygalIn post 502, Deadline Delivery wrote:schadd vote piggy
this is something i also often think but it tends to not follow a wallIn post 507, Prism wrote: I'm having a really hard time parsing her for alignment, so if anyone else wants to pitch in feel free to help out.
the wagon is smoke tho. i don't think pocketing me is very useful here babeIn post 510, Deadline Delivery wrote:I don't see why schadd gives zero shits here as scum and doesn't even try to do anything to fight his wagon or push something else that might in some world be viable unless he's being hardbussed the fuck out of which I wouldn't be surprised by given my reads but he's not really behaving like someone being bussed either
did you end up reading all of mastina's normal? i forgetIn post 513, Deadline Delivery wrote:Ftr wrt schadd not doing shit while getting wagoned 507 is exactly the post that I'd be expecting him to make if he were scum (and if he is scum then he is probably scum with Prism for it), instead he is just shitting around seemingly without a care in the world
^In post 514, Shadoweh wrote:You would expect schadd to make a reads post on how Piggygal is scum? I guess I would expect them to go after someone too to deflect blame. But that would only apply if they were under pressure. If I were in his position I would keep playing it cool since the wagon on him seems poised to collapse at any moment.
What, did I stutter? It's something I'd look for in partners. Obviously I don't think I'm her scum partner. Feel free to think differently.In post 509, Deadline Delivery wrote:WatIn post 507, Prism wrote:I don't even think it points to her being scum, because it'd point to me as her partner
SHIT!In post 518, Belisarius wrote:schadd_ very abruptly and unexpectedly died of syphilis
He wasBeli's Mom, aPost-Restricted Townie. Services will be held all over the world in remembrance of this great and wise human being.
Deadline remains unchanged, and with 12 alive, it's still 7 to lynch
