wow this is really oppurtunistic.In post 1846, Vedith wrote:In
How do you separate multiball hunting from singleball?
wow this is really oppurtunistic.In post 1846, Vedith wrote:In
Well I didn't understand what was town about Tchill. I have changed my mind and I do TR him now though. Regarding Pisskop, yeah I suppose. She hasn't done anything super scummy, but a few of her posts had pinged scum to me.In post 1824, massive wrote:When he's on Gamma's wagon, he is happy to call other people (specifically Tchill) scum but he is stuck to the Gamma wagon. When he finally decides to abandon the Gamma wagon it's onto pisskop for something abstract and (more questionably) NOT onto Tchill who has a counterwagon at that time. But he never really pushes pisskop -- just makes a few snarky answers.
How is it opportunistic?In post 1850, pisskop wrote:wow this is really oppurtunistic.In post 1846, Vedith wrote:In
How do you separate multiball hunting from singleball?
Do you consider 50 pages 'early'?In post 1837, Lore wrote:pisskop argued to end the day early
Thats not what youre saying, because until now Ive ignored you saying things like this.In post 1859, Vedith wrote:You seem to be panicking as if you know it's multi ball, all I'm saying.
I already stated earlier in my iso that if it's multi I'll consider you as Scum. Why did you not react then?
I'll tell you Why, because I was voting Chilly and you had a benefit to not get defensive.
It's not a push.In post 1857, pisskop wrote:Im asking you why youre pushing this with no clear evidence for it.
Its not really like you to make moves like this withoutsomethingto back it up. This game is replete with evidence of your thoroughness, yet this is entirely speculation from you/
Where did I say 'push'?In post 1862, Vedith wrote:It's not a push.In post 1857, pisskop wrote:Im asking you why youre pushing this with no clear evidence for it.
Its not really like you to make moves like this withoutsomethingto back it up. This game is replete with evidence of your thoroughness, yet this is entirely speculation from you/
A push would be me saying we should lynch you encase
In post 1863, pisskop wrote:So in addition to speculative reads and softing lynches, youve now taken to claiming narrative based on things that didnt happen?
thats a bad look vedith.
1857In post 1864, pisskop wrote:Where did I say 'push'?
Youre the one acting weird now vedith.
Consider this an fos
Is this really your argument?In post 1866, pisskop wrote:Duh I said pushing.
Im positive you know the difference between 'push' ala mafia terminology, and pushing in the context I mentioned it.
That's why we're not lynching him.In post 1872, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Transcend will probably flip town.