Probably not AI, but the fact that he's like the third person to vote him for his vote on the IC is kinda meh imo
Just something to note for the future
Anyways, VOTE: Gamma
You've been in all my games except for the newbie ones I play
Probably not AI, but the fact that he's like the third person to vote him for his vote on the IC is kinda meh imo
This is also weirdIn post 18, FourTrouble wrote:PMysterious feels town.
How so?In post 81, Lapsa wrote:scum: pisskop, gamma, tchill, mutton
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
and it is safe to assume that we are in multi-ball
this is grossIn post 67, FourTrouble wrote:Voting mod-confirmed town is scummy. It's similar to self-voting but much worse, much more pro-scum, because while a self-vote might lead to a meaningful wagon on yourself, voting mod-confirmed town leads to nothing, because mod-confirmed town isn't ever getting lynched. There's no possibility of deriving anything meaningful from Transcend's vote and that itself is scummy, it obscures his motives.In post 57, Egg wrote:Fourtrouble, why should we lynch transcend?
Reasoning?In post 69, Transcend wrote:Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Four is town
Egg is too.
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Gamma isn't.
That's the vote I shall do.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
?
Agree with thisIn post 111, Transcend wrote:I don't know what that means but I'm just gonna assume no
Voting who the IC said he'd policy lynch when there's other decent votes on the table looks kinda shitty.
Fair enough I supposeIn post 112, Lore wrote:Its less than 12 hours into the game, even if there are other "decent" votes on the table, i haven't seen enough of them to have much opinion. Especially with gamma being on V/LA till the 1st.
As far as things that look shitty, so does voting for the IC as your RVS vote but we all do shitty things sometimes.
For the record, i didnt vote mutton because the IC said they would policy lynch them. I voted them because i think their only 2 posts were annoying and it doesnt matter at this point in the game anyway other than info gathering. Its not like im a hammer.
?
Oh god poetryIn post 125, MuttonChopMagic wrote:ego is annoying to you?In post 112, Lore wrote:Its less than 12 hours into the game, even if there are other "decent" votes on the table, i haven't seen enough of them to have much opinion. Especially with gamma being on V/LA till the 1st.
As far as things that look shitty, so does voting for the IC as your RVS vote but we all do shitty things sometimes.
For the record, i didnt vote mutton because the IC said they would policy lynch them. I voted them because i think their only 2 posts were annoying and it doesnt matter at this point in the game anyway other than info gathering. Its not like im a hammer.
saying that is pretty poo
in fact, your other two posts are just about me too
overexplaining, sheeping ic, forcing a case, cool
trying to get an easy mislynch as scum
I'm not some homeless bum drunk on rum smelling like cum
I'm just your average townie being lynched by a fool
you flipping red will make me drool
if you had more posts perhaps they'd be fuel
for a case, but no, you're just a tool
me though? I'M not a tool, I rule
I am done derailing, but fr your team is failing
VOTE: lore
Really like this postIn post 161, PMysterious wrote:Reading through, and oh my goodness, Gamma really seems scummy this game.
A case of overreaction. This post felt really unnecessary, as most of us likely know what you were trying to get across to begin with. Maybe it just felt "a little forced". More on that after the next quote.In post 98, Gamma Emerald wrote:Really an exclamation point makes you scumread me? How would you prefer I wrote it? The exclamation point adds a specific tone I was aiming for.In post 61, Egg wrote:I think it's the exclamation point.
This was kinda just more so rude than anything. A post just saying hello is just a post saying hello. I know this is Mafia and all, but this early in the game, we barely know each other. It's almost as if you're just looking for a reason to try and lynch someone to save your behind for a night.
Well, this seems like another case of an overreaction. Plus, pleading Fifth Amendment in a game of Mafia really doesn't work.In post 96, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why are you asking me what's forced about it? Fifth Amendment bitch!In post 57, Egg wrote:I don't like either pmyst's or gamma's reaction to lapsa being confirmed town. Pmyst commenting on it being "quick" feels like he wasn't happy about it. Gamma is the exact opposite, seeming to exaggarate his happiness. It's weird how both initially took pisskop's "always town" comment so seriously too. Both players have made a post I liked though (26 and 33).
Fourtrouble, why should we lynch transcend?And why does pmyst feel town?(I see you retracted that)
Not a fan of pisskop buddying to ABR.
Tchill, why the naked vote on transcend?
Whymafia is coming off nervous, but also noticed a couple of the same things I did.
Gamma, what is forced about saying hi?
Theta, care to elaborate on your "reasons"?
Texcat, why don't you seem happy with a confirmed town?
Vote Gamma
I was happy to start what seemed like an exciting game.
I'm no expert at Mafia, but overreacting to people voting you or asking you questions of this type really does not scream town at all. That, and the completely jerkish move against someone who just wanted to say "hi" really doesn't help favors.
My vote against you was originally an RV, but now I'm sticking to my guns and saying that you are most definitely scum. My vote on you stays, unless you can convince me otherwise. So, please do tell, what reason do you have on a simple "hi" being so forced?
Yet you also thought gamma was scum? Nice chainsaw defense
In my opinion it does. If scum have the opportunity to take an easy wagon, with solid reasoning they probably would. Meanwhile town would, or rather should, critically look and analyze everyone's posts, even if there's an easier lynch target. And I think it was obvious based on my other posts what I think on transcend (that he's null)In post 217, FourTrouble wrote:The ease of a wagon has little to do with whether someone is scum. But the fact that you'd focus on a wagon's ease as opposed to the player's alignment, that's concerning.In post 207, WhyMafia wrote:Lynching transcend is like the easiest wagon
In addition, it's probably a joke vote? I think any player would realize voting a mod confirmed town is completely pointless. Considering it was RVS and the first post in the game, I don't think anything a player posts at that point in the game would have a motive
Everyone has a motive for their posts, including RVS posts. Townies typically want to get out of RVS as quickly as they can, while scum don't really care how long RVS lasts, since they're just trying to avoid getting caught.
Oh andIn post 217, FourTrouble wrote:The ease of a wagon has little to do with whether someone is scum. But the fact that you'd focus on a wagon's ease as opposed to the player's alignment, that's concerning.In post 207, WhyMafia wrote:Lynching transcend is like the easiest wagon
In addition, it's probably a joke vote? I think any player would realize voting a mod confirmed town is completely pointless. Considering it was RVS and the first post in the game, I don't think anything a player posts at that point in the game would have a motive
Everyone has a motive for their posts, including RVS posts. Townies typically want to get out of RVS as quickly as they can, while scum don't really care how long RVS lasts, since they're just trying to avoid getting caught.
I just feel like this is a scum driven wagon. I am not sure how to articulate this properly, but I feel that the faults of Transcend's posts were grossly exaggeratedIn post 235, FourTrouble wrote:If scum have the opportunity to take an easy wagon with solid reasoning on town, sure. But that assumes the person is town, something scum do but not town. If town think someone is scum, regardless of whether it's an easy wagon (and maybe precisely because it's easy and solid), they'll vote that person as quickly as scum would (and maybe quicker if the player is in fact scum). My point is that the ease of a wagon doesn't tell you much about the alignments the wagoners unless you have a clear read on the player (and you've been pretty clear that you've got Transcend as null, which means the ease of the wagon shouldn't be entering your analysis).In post 231, WhyMafia wrote:In my opinion it does. If scum have the opportunity to take an easy wagon, with solid reasoning they probably would. Meanwhile town would, or rather should, critically look and analyze everyone's posts, even if there's an easier lynch target. And I think it was obvious based on my other posts what I think on transcend (that he's null)
However, I don't like his wagon, which therefore is giving me a nulltown read (albeit very thin)
I don't see how theseIn post 240, FourTrouble wrote:@WhyMafia - why'd you say my initial townread on PM was weird?
ScummyIn post 249, FourTrouble wrote:@WhyMafia - what do you think of Gamma?
Reasoning?In post 382, Crush wrote:I Like: Ginngie, Lore, PMysterious, WhyMafia, FourTrouble, Egg (in no particular order). Scummiest so far is Gamma.
I didn't vote because I did not catch up yet. Lets go for:
VOTE: Lexa
I'll be more active tomorrow.
In post 379, MuttonChopMagic wrote:I hard town read gamma
smd not gonna make a diorama
I think his wagon has at least two scum
who? dunno yet, but we'll find out dun dun dun
What is this contradiction?In post 380, MuttonChopMagic wrote:gamma is shitposting yes
and his play isn't blessed
that's pretty nai for him though
and from experience that's a primed scum hammer throw
shitposting can't often be misconstrued as scummy
take transcend, though anyways, usually only by dummies
I kind of understand what you're getting it? But shouldn't you ask Hernandez opinion on stuff then?In post 390, Crush wrote:Lexa and Platinum are the only votes on Gamma on who I have no read. But since Gamma voted for Platinum it seems more natural (?) for me to vote for Lexa. I want to hear more from Lexa to solidify my read on the Gamma wagon.In post 385, WhyMafia wrote:Reasoning?In post 382, Crush wrote:I Like: Ginngie, Lore, PMysterious, WhyMafia, FourTrouble, Egg (in no particular order). Scummiest so far is Gamma.
I didn't vote because I did not catch up yet. Lets go for:
VOTE: Lexa
I'll be more active tomorrow.
Her*In post 392, WhyMafia wrote:I kind of understand what you're getting it? But shouldn't you ask Hernandez opinion on stuff then?In post 390, Crush wrote:Lexa and Platinum are the only votes on Gamma on who I have no read. But since Gamma voted for Platinum it seems more natural (?) for me to vote for Lexa. I want to hear more from Lexa to solidify my read on the Gamma wagon.In post 385, WhyMafia wrote:Reasoning?In post 382, Crush wrote:I Like: Ginngie, Lore, PMysterious, WhyMafia, FourTrouble, Egg (in no particular order). Scummiest so far is Gamma.
I didn't vote because I did not catch up yet. Lets go for:
VOTE: Lexa
I'll be more active tomorrow.
So why do you town read him?In post 400, MuttonChopMagic wrote:that's not what a contradiction isIn post 387, WhyMafia wrote:In post 379, MuttonChopMagic wrote:I hard town read gamma
smd not gonna make a diorama
I think his wagon has at least two scum
who? dunno yet, but we'll find out dun dun dunWhat is this contradiction?In post 380, MuttonChopMagic wrote:gamma is shitposting yes
and his play isn't blessed
that's pretty nai for him though
and from experience that's a primed scum hammer throw
shitposting can't often be misconstrued as scummy
take transcend, though anyways, usually only by dummies
You say his behavior is NAI yet you hard town read him?
I didn't town read him for shitposting ya wiz
Agree that she looks scummyIn post 405, FourTrouble wrote:Her language is very halting. I get the sense she's scared to post, scared to fuck up.In post 391, texcat wrote:What's your fascination with Theta? She's barely posted. Hardly anything to form an opinion on. What do you think is insanely awkward about her 4 posts?
Then look at 291. The words "okay wait," followed by her question, express concern. But there's no attempt to weigh in. Feels like she's pretending to care about Gamma's lynch. Contrived emotion, surrounded by a lots of nothingness.
How can you keep posting like that xdIn post 407, MuttonChopMagic wrote:his wagon grew way too quickIn post 402, WhyMafia wrote:So why do you town read him?In post 400, MuttonChopMagic wrote:that's not what a contradiction isIn post 387, WhyMafia wrote:In post 379, MuttonChopMagic wrote:I hard town read gamma
smd not gonna make a diorama
I think his wagon has at least two scum
who? dunno yet, but we'll find out dun dun dunWhat is this contradiction?In post 380, MuttonChopMagic wrote:gamma is shitposting yes
and his play isn't blessed
that's pretty nai for him though
and from experience that's a primed scum hammer throw
shitposting can't often be misconstrued as scummy
take transcend, though anyways, usually only by dummies
You say his behavior is NAI yet you hard town read him?
I didn't town read him for shitposting ya wiz
sure, maybe it's a bussing trick
but he's not concerned with how he looks
not trying to appease people, not playing by the books
it's just somebody being lynched for playstyle
lynching shitposting before page 10, yall old and senile?
I disagree any of his content is inherently scummy
and as for the wagon as a whole? it's crummy
this is the kind of wagon led by red
it's easy to make someone like gamma dead
I firmly believe he's flipping green
don't lynch him please, that's mean
In post 161, PMysterious wrote:Reading through, and oh my goodness, Gamma really seems scummy this game.
A case of overreaction. This post felt really unnecessary, as most of us likely know what you were trying to get across to begin with. Maybe it just felt "a little forced". More on that after the next quote.In post 98, Gamma Emerald wrote:Really an exclamation point makes you scumread me? How would you prefer I wrote it? The exclamation point adds a specific tone I was aiming for.In post 61, Egg wrote:I think it's the exclamation point.
This was kinda just more so rude than anything. A post just saying hello is just a post saying hello. I know this is Mafia and all, but this early in the game, we barely know each other. It's almost as if you're just looking for a reason to try and lynch someone to save your behind for a night.
Well, this seems like another case of an overreaction. Plus, pleading Fifth Amendment in a game of Mafia really doesn't work.In post 96, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why are you asking me what's forced about it? Fifth Amendment bitch!In post 57, Egg wrote:I don't like either pmyst's or gamma's reaction to lapsa being confirmed town. Pmyst commenting on it being "quick" feels like he wasn't happy about it. Gamma is the exact opposite, seeming to exaggarate his happiness. It's weird how both initially took pisskop's "always town" comment so seriously too. Both players have made a post I liked though (26 and 33).
Fourtrouble, why should we lynch transcend?And why does pmyst feel town?(I see you retracted that)
Not a fan of pisskop buddying to ABR.
Tchill, why the naked vote on transcend?
Whymafia is coming off nervous, but also noticed a couple of the same things I did.
Gamma, what is forced about saying hi?
Theta, care to elaborate on your "reasons"?
Texcat, why don't you seem happy with a confirmed town?
Vote Gamma
I was happy to start what seemed like an exciting game.
I'm no expert at Mafia, but overreacting to people voting you or asking you questions of this type really does not scream town at all. That, and the completely jerkish move against someone who just wanted to say "hi" really doesn't help favors.
My vote against you was originally an RV, but now I'm sticking to my guns and saying that you are most definitely scum. My vote on you stays, unless you can convince me otherwise. So, please do tell, what reason do you have on a simple "hi" being so forced?
What seems forced about it? It seems genuine to me. I never understood the argument of calling something forced, and therefore the creator is scum. Town needs to analyze posts, do they not? You just dismissed her argument without saying anything specificIn post 414, Gamma Emerald wrote:My platinum vote was to see who'd needlessly pick at itIn post 161, PMysterious wrote:Reading through, and oh my goodness, Gamma really seems scummy this game.
A case of overreaction. This post felt really unnecessary, as most of us likely know what you were trying to get across to begin with. Maybe it just felt "a little forced". More on that after the next quote.In post 98, Gamma Emerald wrote:Really an exclamation point makes you scumread me? How would you prefer I wrote it? The exclamation point adds a specific tone I was aiming for.In post 61, Egg wrote:I think it's the exclamation point.
This was kinda just more so rude than anything. A post just saying hello is just a post saying hello. I know this is Mafia and all, but this early in the game, we barely know each other. It's almost as if you're just looking for a reason to try and lynch someone to save your behind for a night.
Well, this seems like another case of an overreaction. Plus, pleading Fifth Amendment in a game of Mafia really doesn't work.In post 96, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why are you asking me what's forced about it? Fifth Amendment bitch!In post 57, Egg wrote:I don't like either pmyst's or gamma's reaction to lapsa being confirmed town. Pmyst commenting on it being "quick" feels like he wasn't happy about it. Gamma is the exact opposite, seeming to exaggarate his happiness. It's weird how both initially took pisskop's "always town" comment so seriously too. Both players have made a post I liked though (26 and 33).
Fourtrouble, why should we lynch transcend?And why does pmyst feel town?(I see you retracted that)
Not a fan of pisskop buddying to ABR.
Tchill, why the naked vote on transcend?
Whymafia is coming off nervous, but also noticed a couple of the same things I did.
Gamma, what is forced about saying hi?
Theta, care to elaborate on your "reasons"?
Texcat, why don't you seem happy with a confirmed town?
Vote Gamma
I was happy to start what seemed like an exciting game.
I'm no expert at Mafia, but overreacting to people voting you or asking you questions of this type really does not scream town at all. That, and the completely jerkish move against someone who just wanted to say "hi" really doesn't help favors.
My vote against you was originally an RV, but now I'm sticking to my guns and saying that you are most definitely scum. My vote on you stays, unless you can convince me otherwise. So, please do tell, what reason do you have on a simple "hi" being so forced?
You read too much into it, looks forced
VOTE: PMysterious
I have null for ginnigie. What makes you town read ginngie and egg?In post 415, Tchill13 wrote:This is me at the moment but I'm reading the thread. Feel townie about ginngie and egg so far.In post 278, pisskop wrote:It looks to me like you were caught out and hopped back on to him.
Only made worse by the idea that in a 21p game with several known lurkers and this site's crappy meta you put him at l-1.
I doubt some of the players have even read the game yet.
Fair enough, but it could be WIFOMIn post 431, Gamma Emerald wrote:Holy fucking shitIn post 234, Boonskiies wrote:
I think we should ask ourselves "does scum get wagoned this fucking easy?" No it does not. My rushed wagon should indicate that I am Town.
Why can't you just outright say something lolIn post 561, Lapsa wrote:try being more space efficient, pleaseIn post 558, WhyMafia wrote: Not really!
it's plenty enough of a burden trying to decipher mutton
Then read meIn post 567, Transcend wrote:Idk haven't read him
In post 563, WhyMafia wrote:Why can't you just outright say something lolIn post 561, Lapsa wrote:try being more space efficient, pleaseIn post 558, WhyMafia wrote: Not really!
it's plenty enough of a burden trying to decipher mutton
I get that you're conf town, but town can better coordinate if we work together. 90% of your posts consist of questions or fluff like that
In post 564, Lapsa wrote:@Transcend what is your read on WhyMafia?In post 562, Transcend wrote:Well ok
Lmao
Can you post something game related plzIn post 574, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Im going to push your abhorrent disaster of a quote fest out of this page you can suck it
wowIn post 589, Lapsa wrote:on other news:
I'm certain that WhyMafia is town
wouldn't trust his opinion though
How so? I actually quite like the postIn post 648, MuttonChopMagic wrote:this is caught scum one hundred percent lolIn post 638, Lore wrote:so everyone jumped on transcend for voting lapsa as a rvs on post 1 where it was clear it would never happen. where are all the votes on abr and massive? do they get a pass because lapsa did the stupid quote-pyramid-spam?
mutton: lol you are SO focused on me, my vote is only on you at this point because i haven't seen a better place to put it.
[unv][/unv]
does that make you feel better? I still think you are focused on me because of OMGUS and nothing you have said has convinced me otherwise. I have my eye on you still.
Tchill: i think its kinda scummy that you didn't even read the VERY FIRST POST once the game started. Thats not some weird modconfirmed town in the middle of a page like 400 posts in, it was post 1.
I dont like this post. It really rubs me the wrong way.In post 406, FourTrouble wrote:I dunno how anyone could get to this point in the game and not townread me.
idk, i need to do a reread, so much shitposting to wade through and i dont even have my tall boots on....
someone help me wagon him im alone yall
As gamma said, what was the point in joining the wagon if you don't even know why that person was scum?In post 702, Lexa wrote:Aka been following the thread on my phone, haven't invested time into creating independent thoughts yet
Regarding your read on me, may I ask you to elaborate on "blending in?"In post 623, Egg wrote:ABR is consistent with what I've seen in his town game. His scum game is a little more lurky and vote hoppy. He tunnels more as town and while I don't agree with him about ginngie, I believe that he believes his case.In post 614, FourTrouble wrote:@Egg - couple questions.
Why's ABR/Mutton town?
Why is Theta more town than Tex, PM, or Transcend?
Why's Piss scum?
Why's WhyMafia scum?
Mutton is hard to read because of his gimmick, but he seems to be going out on a limb with gamma and thinking for himself with lore. I have a soft spot for people who go against the grain and he's kind of doing that.
Theta is pretty null for me. People are scumreading her posting style which I don't get and the fact that she's above those names has more to do with them than her. I had issues with tex's comments about the lapsa votes, specifcally her lack of opinion on it but choice to comment anyway. I had issues with pmyst's early posting although he's gotten better and I feel like I remember misreading him in a past game before. And Transcend's overreaction to pisskop kind of sucked.
Pisskop had a couple of cases of buddying that stood out to me. First with ABR and then with lapsa. It doesn't sound like much, but they were pretty blatant cases of it and the second could be an attempt to pocket the IC.
Whymafia is a hard one to explain because it's mostly a tone read. It's like he's...I dunno, struggling to fit in? Does that make sense? Like his focus is on blending rather than catching scum.
I don't like this postIn post 757, pisskop wrote:actually, Id like to hear from the vanities, get lynches and opinions about posts and statements, and then lynch. We got enough today for the most part.
Too much of this site likes to draaaaag the days out.
Ask me anything on why I voted her/him
butIn post 765, massive wrote:massive: OK people we need less vanity votes
WhyMafia: *moves off of a wagon onto a vanity vote with a player with six posts and an RVS*
Just kill me now.
I guess .... it's still a bad post imoIn post 764, Gamma Emerald wrote:It's just suggesting focusing on the current wagons. I'd be a little miffed if I believe none were on scum but I'm voting one so I don't really object. As for ending the day early I feel some might need to weigh in more but that's p much it.
Oh I see what you mean. I am not calling it a wagon. We're not anywhere near deadline, so there's no need for me to vote on one of the main wagons yet. In addition, I view pisskop as scum. Are you telling me not to vote for those who I perceive to be scum?In post 770, massive wrote:Your vote is a vanity vote.In post 766, WhyMafia wrote:butIn post 765, massive wrote:massive: OK people we need less vanity votes
WhyMafia: *moves off of a wagon onto a vanity vote with a player with six posts and an RVS*
Just kill me now.
he/she has 45 posts and has been active
If I say just exactly that you will say "oh no it's a wagon, Theta is on it with me."
Theta has six posts and the vote is RVS.
HENCE
It's not a wagon. It's you vanity voting. Knock it off.
^^In post 778, MuttonChopMagic wrote:it's about the timing gin
right as your hypothetical buddy starts getting wagoned you come in
attack one of the voters, aka indirectky detailing the wagon
plus it absolved you of having to take a stance on lore, game on
What in the world does this have to do with effort?In post 784, pisskop wrote:Lol.
Some people just cant howdo solve game.
Instead of making efforts, whymaf is going to make an easy vote for theory reasons this late in the day?
But why were you trying to sort her/shift the conversation as a wagon was springing up?In post 809, Ginngie wrote:cuz my ass was trying to sort Lexa and I don't get why I was getting shit for it.In post 808, MuttonChopMagic wrote:and I never expressed a town read on lexaIn post 802, Ginngie wrote:I've been asking this for multiple pages don't be daft
so again, why are you being so perplexing
Then when I see people just not give an utter shit about what I'm concerned about, I ask what's going on with the current wagon so I can actually engage with ya'll and I'm scum read for it.
I'm not calling Theta town, but is it really worth to push a lynch on him when there are other possibilities? In my head, he has had one bad post. Anyone can do that regardless of alignment. If he gets away scot free by d2/d3 without posting any thoughts/prodging, then we have a problem. At this stage of the game however, I feel like pushing a lynch on Theta is a hinderance at best
NopeIn post 917, FourTrouble wrote:Take a look at your games. You probably do it more as scum.In post 914, WhyMafia wrote:The only thing I disagree with is the doubtcast language
I have a tendency to do that regardless of alignment
Because he might be genuinely inactive and we would just be wasting time. The next he posts, we would pounce.In post 921, Lexa wrote:Why would you not push him? Either he responds adequately and we move somewhere else or he fails to do so and you've got yourself a successful lynch candidate. You can't really say "oh he's had one bad post" when he's only made like six of themIn post 911, WhyMafia wrote:I'm not calling Theta town, but is it really worth to push a lynch on him when there are other possibilities? In my head, he has had one bad post. Anyone can do that regardless of alignment. If he gets away scot free by d2/d3 without posting any thoughts/prodging, then we have a problem. At this stage of the game however, I feel like pushing a lynch on Theta is a hinderance at best
.............In post 954, Lapsa wrote:don't give a fuckIn post 953, Gamma Emerald wrote: Can you please explain your vote more because this is extremely fucking vague.
I did but you haven't given any reasons yetIn post 1011, Lapsa wrote:didn't you already said that?In post 1010, WhyMafia wrote:Lapsa I think it will help if you actually tell us why you have a strong scum read on gamma
First time playing with him. He's usually like this?In post 1015, pisskop wrote:each and every person attacking lapsa who hasnt been in multiple games with him is being lazy andor ignorantly following along
in social games you have to explore the standard other layers set. especially when they have immunity
But I don't see why we should ignore lapsaIn post 1016, pisskop wrote:attacking the damn ic instead of ignoring a player you dont like.
and scum cam easily join in for extra credits
SighIn post 1019, Lapsa wrote:and this is why your opinion is worthlessIn post 1013, WhyMafia wrote: Stop taking being confirmed town for granted