VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
Random completely out of context sheep.
A50 guarantees ww lynch.
Dunker knows he can get two back to back lynches if A50 wrong. If A50 correct, zero accountability sheep. No questioning either. I like this vote and will follow.
VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
Scum angry at being caught for the wrong reason.In post 111, Almost50 wrote:And THAT is EXACTLY why I brought up meta. Everyone who played with Scum!Me knows I'm MUCH better than to be caught on D1, and even more so than to be "shook". You go check ANY of my Scum games before you further embarrass yourself.In post 99, Tails wrote:This is an example of why Almost is scum. First part is him flailing. Throwing out some BS about gut having to be universal or some crap. Gut is gut. Normally there's more to it than one action. Then he says something about meta before saying "you don't have meta on me because we haven't played together so nah!". He came dangerously close to claiming there, and that was the equivalent of saying that you can't be caught because the other person never saw you commit the murder.In post 87, Almost50 wrote:You're going in loops. If something triggers a "gut" SR for you then the same thing should trigger the same feeling coming from anyone. It's not like you are using "meta" to justify it either (and you actually can't, because you don't have enough experience with me, so..)
Anyway, keep the vote. It doesn't worry me. I've said my piece though, and you can rest assured you will be caught sooner than later. Lynch me or shoot me (not sure which of the scum groups you belong to) and you will still be caught.
Then he follows it up in the second part with false bravado. He's shook scum.
How about no one? Why don't you just scumhunt regularly and let the seer do their job?In post 115, Almost50 wrote: Well, considering there is NO COP in this game, who else would you have me ask for their attention??
Except directing investigations is scummy af.In post 115, Almost50 wrote: We only have ONE investigative, and I'm narrowing down their pool for the first investigation. Now if we lynch one of you and they flip WOLF then the other is Mafia and no need for the Seer to check them.
Town's in a different conundrum either way. Wolves have a NK and are dangerous in that way, but a nightless with mafia is not exactly better. Either way, it's best to just try to get a flip and work from there. The best strategy can be figured out on a later day with more information. Only the scum factions have it in their best interest to push for a certain outcome.In post 115, Almost50 wrote: Also, Town DOES in fact care. The Werewolves are the faction with the NK. Unless we can direct them to kill the Mafia (which we can't, both because we don't know who the Mafia are AND because you can't leash a Werewolf) then we aim to stop the NKs and take control of all the killings (which can only be though lynches at that point).
When did I express any sort of concern about that? I simply pointed out that you were more focused on finding werewolves than mafia, which is further supported by this very post, where you say it's more important to find wolves. I just pointed out that you were most likely to be mafia due to the fact you were focusing more on a single faction. Otherwise, I really don't care, as I'm lynching scum either way.In post 115, Almost50 wrote: This is fact makes me lean WW on YOU, because you're worried I'm hunting specifically for YOUR faction, which in turn makes YOU hunting for MAFIA rather than WWs.
Normally I'd wonder if scum Almost would make this. I don't think he would as wolf, since it would be too risky, as he'd know he'd lose. However, I think he'd try it as mafia and rely on no one following through. Again, primary focus on werewolves here.In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Guys; let's lynch Tails. If this doesn't flip a WEREWOLF I get speed lynched on D2. Any takers?
This is a scumpost. The fence is largely set in Brie's butt at this point.In post 119, TheBrie wrote:A50 seems to be making more sense than Tails here. To me at least. But if we lynch town today and the WW kill a townie tonight, that puts at at 2-3-5. But then with this much scum in the game, there's a reasonable chance of hitting scum at random.
So I'm not quite ready to lynch Tails, though I'm slightly suspicious of him.
Why don't you try this again with more thought.In post 120, Dunkerdoodles wrote:This guy seems legit. everything he's saying makes sense, his wagon seems scum driven and I like his style.In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Guys; let's lynch Tails. If this doesn't flip a WEREWOLF I get speed lynched on D2. Any takers?
VOTE: Tails
You could just join the wagon.In post 131, Tails wrote:Why don't you try this again with more thought.In post 120, Dunkerdoodles wrote:This guy seems legit. everything he's saying makes sense, his wagon seems scum driven and I like his style.In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Guys; let's lynch Tails. If this doesn't flip a WEREWOLF I get speed lynched on D2. Any takers?
VOTE: Tails
Almost50 always gets wagoned and I would like the opportunity to read you both without pages of back and forth in between. I want to see whether his push on you is a desperate attack on you or genuine and I want to see if you can generate original content outside of him.In post 133, Tails wrote:I like Almost better.
Brie was trying awfully hard to distance from Almost when everything she claims to know about him as a player should be causing her to vote him. She outright stated that Almost was not playing like he does as town, yet she refused to vote him. She then continues to be noncommittal while avoiding the wagon. Also look at her fencesit on me. She's actively avoiding controversial wagons.In post 139, Titus wrote: Why Brie over dunker?
It was his rationale, or lack thereof. I explained that when I voted him.In post 140, Almost50 wrote:What exactly was wrong with Dunkerdoodles placing a second vote on Tails??
I never said I knew anything about Almost's town play. I only know him as scum, and he is pretty good as scum. I couldn't pick him from his play, only from logic. So I have no idea what he is this time.In post 141, Tails wrote:Brie was trying awfully hard to distance from Almost when everything she claims to know about him as a player should be causing her to vote him. She outright stated that Almost was not playing like he does as town, yet she refused to vote him. She then continues to be noncommittal while avoiding the wagon. Also look at her fencesit on me. She's actively avoiding controversial wagons.In post 139, Titus wrote: Why Brie over dunker?
That makes a lot of sense. I think I'll follow along on this.In post 125, Titus wrote:VOTE: Dunkerdoodles
Random completely out of context sheep.
A50 guarantees ww lynch.
Dunker knows he can get two back to back lynches if A50 wrong. If A50 correct, zero accountability sheep. No questioning either. I like this vote and will follow.