I don't miss those days.In post 902, Carcalilly wrote:Dude,, since we can't shitpost anymore, let's shitcontentpost??
I remember when everyone did long isos, long cases, etc. etc.
So I'm honestly so thrown off rn
I feel like staying up and playing y'all got me excited
Out of all the things the mulch line is what bothers me BECAUSE he still isnt making better posts. I'm unstatsified with Mulch, which therefore I think you two could be scum together.In post 923, Branson wrote:We already went over this. The issue I was pointing out in 417 was specifically your tone shift, and what I said in 416 details pretty clearly why that comparison isn't applicable. I asked what Sergtacos' post was there for since I didn't understand why he posted that when he did. It was a single, simple question with an explanation for why I wanted it answered. You stretched it out to half a dozen questions.In post 895, Carcalilly wrote:416 and 417: You low-key blamed me for trying to figure out the RVS interaction... and bring it more into the real game. I asked if it was related to the real game/if it was scummy etc.
Then,yougo and question a oneliner.
422: This doesn't look too good to me. All the "would" and "why" swip swap could be a way for you to twist my intentions. I literally just said "why".
I agree that the post he made is scummy in a vacuum. The problem is, it fits the way he had been playing up to that point. Playstyle isn't scummy.423: That is an extremely easy off the hook for an extremely scummy post. Are you just gonna like, walk past it and say, meh, looks normal cuz Tacobutt??
As far as I know, everything Trivium had brought up there, I had already addressed in that day's catchup before reaching that post. Is there anything that I didn't?521: New points were brought up. You didn't adress them, you just turned back, like "already taken care of"
Did... you read my post and the one I was referring to?767: Empiri made it clear that it was weighing pros andcons. Brandson still says it as "no downsides".
I was scumreading Mulch for using the fact that he was being completely useless as a shield against being lynched. The read completely changed when he both fixed the problem and started making better posts.
I'm just curious what they think of you because my scum read on you could be weak. Like I mentioned before, I like to hunt towns as well so I know who is who basically. Helps me narrow down things. I just wanted to weigh the scum reads and town reads and see which fits you.In post 922, Tchill13 wrote:Sergtacos you specifically ask for trivium and boonskies to convince you what they think of me and mulch. Why do you ask for boonskies help? Is it only because he town reads me? I ask this because it doesn't seem like trivium town reads me. I'm wondering what the common ground between the two are for you.
Know what, thats it this is pinging me hard. VOTE: TchillIn post 917, Tchill13 wrote:Mulch is town because of his case against carcalilly which I strongly agree with. Carcalilly is the only scum case that makes sense to me at this point. There's a lot of fluff with carcalilly, no real direction to her posts.In post 894, Sergtacos wrote:How is mulch town??
How is Branson town??
You're giving me scummy vibes
many people are reportedly town reading people for their case on meIn post 929, Sergtacos wrote:Know what, thats it this is pinging me hard. VOTE: TchillIn post 917, Tchill13 wrote:Mulch is town because of his case against carcalilly which I strongly agree with. Carcalilly is the only scum case that makes sense to me at this point. There's a lot of fluff with carcalilly, no real direction to her posts.In post 894, Sergtacos wrote:How is mulch town??
How is Branson town??
You're giving me scummy vibes
Oh he's town because of his case against carcalilly? A lot of people are making cases against her and you happen to read him as town because of that? If I remember correctly I was the first person to make the case and yet you sucm read me. I find it odd how you would town read mulch especially when he didn't read up until now but only up to page 9? You two are scums, period.
Which is what I find scummy. Because that doesn't make a person automatic town just by reading you scum.In post 930, Carcalilly wrote:many people are reportedly town reading people for their case on meIn post 929, Sergtacos wrote:Know what, thats it this is pinging me hard. VOTE: TchillIn post 917, Tchill13 wrote:Mulch is town because of his case against carcalilly which I strongly agree with. Carcalilly is the only scum case that makes sense to me at this point. There's a lot of fluff with carcalilly, no real direction to her posts.In post 894, Sergtacos wrote:How is mulch town??In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net /viewtopic.php?p=9331865#p9331865]post 888[/url], Tchill13 wrote:VOTE: Carcalilly
So mulch is town, Branson is town too.
How is Branson town??
You're giving me scummy vibes
Oh he's town because of his case against carcalilly? A lot of people are making cases against her and you happen to read him as town because of that? If I remember correctly I was the first person to make the case and yet you sucm read me. I find it odd how you would town read mulch especially when he didn't read up until now but only up to page 9? You two are scums, period.
wowIn post 909, Fykus wrote:You mean like thisIn post 907, Carcalilly wrote: And Fykus kinda sheeped a couple times in ways I didn't like either.
VOTE: branson
Tbh I thought that was funny. Made me want to put him to scum but he's lean scum to me now but the same time I would have done that too.In post 933, Carcalilly wrote:wowIn post 909, Fykus wrote:You mean like thisIn post 907, Carcalilly wrote: And Fykus kinda sheeped a couple times in ways I didn't like either.
VOTE: branson
just
wow
L-1 is where the real stuffs at
I agree with this. Also, trying to look oblivious could be a way to look town? As they're the uninformed.In post 914, Trivium wrote: 581 seems too oblivious, like if he hasn't read the game why is he voting all over the place and on wagons?
Wanna vote for mulch? I'll be gladly to switch my vote on to him since I think he's scum tooIn post 936, Carcalilly wrote:I agree with this. Also, trying to look oblivious could be a way to look town? As they're the uninformed.In post 914, Trivium wrote: 581 seems too oblivious, like if he hasn't read the game why is he voting all over the place and on wagons?
Not yet, I want him to respond to my responses first...In post 937, Sergtacos wrote:Wanna vote for mulch? I'll be gladly to switch my vote on to him since I think he's scum tooIn post 936, Carcalilly wrote:I agree with this. Also, trying to look oblivious could be a way to look town? As they're the uninformed.In post 914, Trivium wrote: 581 seems too oblivious, like if he hasn't read the game why is he voting all over the place and on wagons?
FTFYIn post 937, Sergtacos wrote:If you vote for Mulch I'll jump on and take less flak for lynching town. I won't just vote him and push him though or that will make me look badIn post 936, Carcalilly wrote:I agree with this. Also, trying to look oblivious could be a way to look town? As they're the uninformed.In post 914, Trivium wrote: 581 seems too oblivious, like if he hasn't read the game why is he voting all over the place and on wagons?
vedith plzIn post 939, Vedith wrote:FTFYIn post 937, Sergtacos wrote:If you vote for Mulch I'll jump on and take less flak for lynching town. I won't just vote him and push him though or that will make me look badIn post 936, Carcalilly wrote:I agree with this. Also, trying to look oblivious could be a way to look town? As they're the uninformed.In post 914, Trivium wrote: 581 seems too oblivious, like if he hasn't read the game why is he voting all over the place and on wagons?
I can definitely see that...In post 941, Vedith wrote:I'm sorry but that was just such a bad post from Taco!
In post 360, Empiricus wrote:In post 358, Trivium wrote:This is what Mafia is all about.In post 355, Sergtacos wrote:Idk right now. We need more people to post. I mean i was just thinking, know what would be funny? if we all townies argue and lynch each other, doing scum's work when some people haven't posted yet and they could be scums. xDIn post 337, Klazam wrote:Who you thinking here, Taco?
I can almost guarantee you that at least one scum is lurking right now waiting for exactly that.
I'm not opposed to just lynching the least active player unless someone in play is actively scummy. At least in the first round, since that is the round that is both the easiest to float through and the one that leaves the most data to go through after a lynch.