Mini Normal 1919: Endgame

[Klazam]

Shit man, thinking about today, I'd play this the exact same way if I was scum. wow.

[ThinkBig]

Official Vote Count

No Lynch

(2): Klazam, Mulch

L-1

Not Voting

(2): Empiricus, Fykus

With 4 alive, it takes 3 to lynch.

The day 5 deadline is in

: (expired on 2017-07-10 15:52:15)

[Mulch]

ThinkBig your probably laughing your ass off rn

[Klazam]

Hm. Actually no. I'd have stayed on fykus, to stay constient with my potion on the previous day.

[Klazam]

Position.

[Klazam]

Oh god. Just thought of a lylo scenario mafia could put us in that would be a nightmare here.

[Klazam]

I believe that it won't happen. I have to.

Gonna shut up now. Sorry for spamming the thread

[Mulch]

Oh god. Just thought of a lylo scenario mafia could put us in that would be a nightmare here.

what

[Klazam]

I ain't saying

[Mulch]

Why

[Mulch]

Town to scum

Klazam, boonskies
Branson, vedith, Trivium, TwoFace
Dunkerdoodles, Fykus, empiricus
Carcalilly, Mulch
Sergtacos

[Mulch]

Taco you're doing me a concern ^

How?

I'm aware that I'm tunneling but you're the only one with enough posts to make something solid out of so...
This is about you,

Sergtaco

~ Also threw in a little bit of advice in there because why not

Topic: Klazam Suspicion

23- RVS vote
40- Saying that they're lurking??? (IMO: He's mentioned it many times with Klazam, yet, he hasn't mentioned anyone else who's lurking.)
60- Possible explanation as to why he's getting at them. ("Fight me"?)
124- A vote and scum read without evidence. (Low-key red flag )

IMO: Could this be a scum bussing attempt? Are you trying to get at Klazam? Why be persistent on it, especially with that vote in their absence? They have

one RVS post

.

Topic: Scumhunting

53- Initial show of strong opinions on scumhunting
63- He doesn't "believe in scumhunting" (IMO: It's a reasonable belief. However... keep reading)

IMO: You can consider scumhunting as NAI, but please don't emphasize being against it, as it can be discouraging. We want people to scumhunt, town or scum, because it STILL reveals information. Also, maybe focus on the

results.

This post is a highlight of my results, talking and questioning you was the hunting, for example.

Topic: Lightheartedness

!Now, I don't have anything against lightheartedness, but I just wanted to take this into account.!
IMO: Your posts have been very lighthearted, and I honestly enjoy talking to you because of that. However, I'm not going to ignore possible alt motives.
-I know that posting lightness can help emotionally when you are feeling heavy or guilty. Do you anything to feel guilty about, Taco?
-Provides distraction, keeps the game from moving forward.
-Appeal to emotion. Act friendly and get on people's good side.

Topic: Self Defense

A quick thing, but when I question him, he tends to turn it back against me.
84- A vote after a clash of opinions.
127- I'm suspicious of someone, and I'm "just saying that to look town"? Don't turn to that, that's a very easy and typical defense.

Defend. Yourself.

VOTE: Sergtacos
For now.

Anyway... someone else please come it. I don't like tunnel battles.

This could be a bus!Klazam post, cause he didn't vote him, but still.

[Klazam]

Why

Because If I say, scum will put us in that scenario

Also that carc post isn't anti-me. If anything, it's defending me.

[Klazam]

Defending me when I had a single RVS post lol

[Mulch]

I'm bored and I want to place my vote on someone

Strong Town: Trivium, Empiricus

Town lean: Dunkerdoodles, Tchill, Klazam

Null: Boonskies, shuffleplay, Brandson

Scum lean: Fykus, Tacobutt, Mulch

Strong Scum: None...... Yet

Fykus, any original substance on that Mulch vote?

[Mulch]

I'm bored and I want to place my vote on someone

Strong Town: Trivium, Empiricus

Town lean: Dunkerdoodles, Tchill, Klazam

Null: Boonskies, shuffleplay, Brandson

Scum lean: Fykus, Tacobutt, Mulch

Strong Scum: None...... Yet

Fykus, any original substance on that Mulch vote?

Rules of 3

[Mulch]

Scum lean: Fykus, Tacobutt, Mulch

[Mulch]

Yet he only pushed Taco and me

[Klazam]

What is rules of 3

[Mulch]

Town lean: Dunkerdoodles, Tchill, Klazam

It's suboncious... but would he really put his two scum partners next to each other?

[Mulch]

What is rules of 3

1/3 are scum

[Klazam]

Ah

[Mulch]

'sup folks, this'll be fun!

VOTE: Klazam
Why do you want to fight the taco? I wanted to be the one to fight the taco!

this pinged me. the fact that I see the rest of his play scummy as well just heightened the read anymore. That post alone would have had me put him as null-scum.

I think Branson is scum, and if we flipped him and he flips scum, I'd probably raise you up to green. If he flipped town, you'd probably stay where you are for now. This isn't to say that if he's town you are 100% scum or anything, as I don't see it that way. I just see a high chance of Branson flipping scum, but I realize that we're not even 40 pages into the game yet, and most of the game was just Taco.

I've played a decent amount with 2F.

Uhm... You sure it's not your gut acting up? I really dont see anything pinging at all about that post. It's an introduction post. And RVS........

And I assumed that from your post. Honestly, I have a slight town read on Branson, and it's probably because of how he plays it's... Like me, almost. Like, we want to get he pressure on. Right now. Pressure is the best way to get scum to slip. Scum slipping is the thing to go for, not just "this sounds kiiiinda scummy to me but interpretations blah blah blah".

I think this confirms that he is not partners with Empiricus, considering how they bussed earlier in the game

[Mulch]

UNVOTE:

[Mulch]

Also I've been getting a bad gut feelin' from Fykus for some reason,, if u didn't see my questioning before, it exists man.

Fykus, are you actually busy or? Your reasoning seems to be bare minimum if not absent in a lot of your points.

This is bussing distance