Mini Normal 1940: The Apartment [Endgame]

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Nothing you can say because you've been caught faking a read.

It's literally impossible for you claim to not remember why you started to scum read him at that specific point since you also just claimed you went through his ISO. You don't just bother to go through an ISO of someone you voted just because.

Your time line is off

I scum read him after the ISO. I voted him before that. It wasn't just because. I started with Tess and then did them togyhalf way through Tess.

So why did you vote Boon before you were scum reading him?

[Srceenplay]

I don't remember.
Probably random. I don't know. I'm not going to give an answer that's not true.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

I don't remember.
Probably random. I don't know. I'm not going to give an answer that's not true.

I think you decided to pick a name out of a hat and tried to see if it would stick while looking for dirt incase it didn't.

[Srceenplay]

The opportunistic play would have to just get on the biggest wagon and say I'll catch up later.
That's not what I did. I looked back and voted elsewhere. Saying I'm trying to get a random name to stick when I could have been content on a mulch wagon doesn't add up.

[Srceenplay]

You are stuck on something that was nai and trying to make it stick.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

The opportunistic play would have to just get on the biggest wagon and say I'll catch up later.
That's not what I did. I looked back and voted elsewhere. Saying I'm trying to get a random name to stick when I could have been content on a mulch wagon doesn't add up.

That's just one play scum could have did.

Why would it be best for someone replacing into a slot to do that as scum? A slot that was arguably considered a lurker by many. The same slot Mulch seem to express concerns about?

[Lil Uzi Vert]

You are stuck on something that was nai and trying to make it stick.

Not being able to explain why you voted for someone when it can reasonably infered that you had strong reasons to isn't NAI.

[Vedith]

Vedith \o/

[Fykus]

@Fykus:

Sheeped the wagon because the people on it were all better than me and even if some scum were on there they couldnt have all been scum so theoretically there was a good chance they were right to vote there

We know now that Mulch/RC are town, but at the time of your vote, why weren't you worried that at least one of RC/Vedith/Mulch were scum, especially since you said you can't even read RC/Mulch. Mulch even admitted that he was pocketing you . . . why weren't you worried about being pocketed by any of them?

Yeah but I figured that not everyone on the wagon could be scum. I figured the chances of it being scum led mislynch were outweighed by the potential of some of these good players being right about the lynch being on a scum.

[Fykus]

I actually missed this post but then i saw it in one of fire's recent posts.

Fykus has 15 posts and none of them give me a read :/

@Fykus
From your votes D1 i'm assuming you're scumreading Tes, what's your reasoning?

I honestly cant remember without going back and rereading my posts. I think it had something to do with all the big names being on the wagon so that even if some were scum they couldnt all be.

Yeah that's blatant sheeping. Also how come you declared intent to hammer on me and you don't remember why you scumread me anymore?

To put pressure/get a claim so we could speed the day along.

[Fykus]

UNVOTE: luv

Im being really lazy atm and I dont think ill be trying to make a case until the weekend atleast. But basically I'm following mulch's final words about luv being scum. Last time I did that it turned out he was right (about like 6 things).

[Fykus]

I think luv/vedith are scum. For some reason im town leaning boon, and as such I guess I agree with his town reads on the keyen slot, i guess ill agree with mulch that skitter is town (i honestly cant tell though, i never can with her). I'll try build up the effort to do some process of elimination tomorrow to try and speculate the last scum with. Also at some stage I think I should go back and have a look at RC's ISO to see if I can come up with any reason why he was night killed apart from the fact that he is who he is. Maybe he crumbed and someone noticed? I know I didn't.

[Vedith]

That we both are, or that 1 of us is?

[Fykus]

Maybe both. Youre super quiet this game. More so than usual. It makes me paranoid

[Srceenplay]

The opportunistic play would have to just get on the biggest wagon and say I'll catch up later.
That's not what I did. I looked back and voted elsewhere. Saying I'm trying to get a random name to stick when I could have been content on a mulch wagon doesn't add up.

That's just one play scum could have did.

Why would it be best for someone replacing into a slot to do that as scum? A slot that was arguably considered a lurker by many. The same slot Mulch seem to express concerns about?

That's just it as scum why would I replace in, draw attention to myself before I even knew the game state?

You are stuck on something that was nai and trying to make it stick.

Not being able to explain why you voted for someone when it can reasonably infered that you had strong reasons to isn't NAI.

How do you figure I had a strong reason to vote Boon without no reasoning or context before it?

[Vedith]

Maybe both. Youre super quiet this game. More so than usual. It makes me paranoid

I'm plotting your death.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

The opportunistic play would have to just get on the biggest wagon and say I'll catch up later.
That's not what I did. I looked back and voted elsewhere. Saying I'm trying to get a random name to stick when I could have been content on a mulch wagon doesn't add up.

That's just one play scum could have did.

Why would it be best for someone replacing into a slot to do that as scum? A slot that was arguably considered a lurker by many. The same slot Mulch seem to express concerns about?

That's just it as scum why would I replace in, draw attention to myself before I even knew the game state?

You are stuck on something that was nai and trying to make it stick.

Not being able to explain why you voted for someone when it can reasonably infered that you had strong reasons to isn't NAI.

I figured because he had just posted recently (892). I think it's fair to assume something had pinged you about that post or his posts just before that.

[Srceenplay]

I wished you would have pushed this when it was fresh in my mind.

Rereading that section it's possible I voted Boon because he was one of the recent active posters from when I last posted.
Still no reason for it as either alignment.

[Srceenplay]

@Boon, what's you thoughts on this now? Can you give a rundown on of those on the wagon?

if I am to feel Eddie is town, then I think everyone on Mulch's wagon is town.

Mulch -> 7 (Boonskiies - 491, Eddie Cane - 519, TesXX - 623, Keyen - 641, Vedith - 894, Skitter30 - 1036 Lil Uzi Vert - 1047 = HAMMER

[Eddie Cane]

Talk about your hood Eddie.
Do you two suspect each other? Town read each other?
What about what RC said. Does the timeline fit? Look suspicious or coincidencental?

the timeline somewhat ish fits? it was a day or two after iirc. I disagree with rcs assertion as a whole, tess questioned the assertion exactly as I did and i don't think seeing an obvious rxn test means scum!tess is partners with scarab. I think scarab is probably town, he is not talking much though and hasn't actually been on to discuss the game.

[WhyMafia]

Prodding Scarab ...

[Eddie Cane]

Is there a reason why I should be?

Is there a reason why you shouldn't be?

Everyone is guilty until proven innocent you know.

In that case...why point out Fykus, and not both Eddie and Fykus?

Simple.

No alarms have gone off for me in regards to Eddie, so I don't see a reason at this particular time to see if he's actually guilty or not.

but didn't you literally just describe innocent until proven guilty and simultaneously fos fykus? idgi

[Eddie Cane]

There are seven people not voting.

Can all of you please put a vote somewhere so we can get a direction to go this day.
Maybe that will start the game flow

^

[Eddie Cane]

*sigh*

Do you see how we've gone full circle now? You should have just answered my question to begin with.

What alarms have gone off for you in regards to Fykus?

That was the plan because it seemed like you were not only trying to dodge the original question but also trying to make me look bad.

Quite a bit. The unwillingness to avoid taking a hard stance on anyone or anything, his voting pattern, and his shading of the Jin slot.

I shaded the jin slot.

[Lil Uzi Vert]

Is there a reason why I should be?

Is there a reason why you shouldn't be?

Everyone is guilty until proven innocent you know.

In that case...why point out Fykus, and not both Eddie and Fykus?

Simple.

No alarms have gone off for me in regards to Eddie, so I don't see a reason at this particular time to see if he's actually guilty or not.

but didn't you literally just describe innocent until proven guilty and simultaneously fos fykus? idgi

What?

I operate with the assumption people are guilty until I am given no reason to. I'm saying I have no interest in proving if you're most likely guilty at this time. I have no interest in trying to prove the why or why not in regards to you.