Mini Normal 1938 [Game Over]
-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I disagree. Agreeing is much better than disagreeing. Agreed?
-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Sorry, referring to this
In post 31, CloudKicker wrote:
i dont like to rvsIn post 28, necro wrote:I don't like that Cloudkicker is not putting a vote down yet.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I can't tell if this is a bait or not. lolIn post 38, necro wrote:
You said you're away so am assuming you aren't really 'all here' right now.In post 29, Robbnva wrote:I haven't put one down either. Does that bug you also or just cloud?
Cloudkicker is the only player who seems to be getting to page2 and is not trying to sort alignments or build pressure anywhere. To that end:
Vote: Cloudkicker-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
@necro As Robbnva said, he isn't even on VLA yet. And you didn't even vote, you just bolded the text.
@cloud But what is your reason for not liking RVS? Surely you must admit it has its place, and you participating in RVS would only create more information for town. I'd like to hear Robbvna's opinion on this too since he claims to not like it either.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
In post 55, IgnitionUSMC wrote:First time playing a mafia game here after playing it on other sites.
I don't like posts like these when there are already some things being brought up worth talking about. Makes me think you don't want to participate in the discussion. The self-vote is especially lacking in content I feel.In post 42, Jordarrian wrote:Hey guys. If you happen to know me, congrats. I have some experience with mafia but I'm still pretty shit at it
VOTE: Jord
This is obviously the play here
Care to elaborate?
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
lol, my thoughts tooIn post 67, CloudKicker wrote:Hurting town, its p3-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
You're that sure of yourself, are you?In post 89, Robbnva wrote: Also typically me not RVS voting usually draws attention to myself and that ends up being more useful than me posting a random vote on somebody.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
What makes you say that? I don't think it's early for that at all.In post 98, Havo wrote:
VOTE: lovelifeIn post 62, lovelife wrote:Because you're choosing to ignore the ongoing conversations. Why?
Too early for the Bull in the China shop.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Why.
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I actually agree with you here.In post 121, Havo wrote: I just pointed out that I thought it was early for someone to be getting bothered by you receiving a single vote.
A SINGLE vote.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
lmaoIn post 133, Havo wrote:
Not before Day 2In post 127, Backhand wrote:When do we cross the magic threshold when its OK to "throw shade" or be a "bull in a china shop?" How does your ideal Day 1 .
My ideal Day 1 is scum says something shady and I call them out and town says Oh hells yeah and we lynch them but only after I peg his buddies by association.
Fixed quote tag-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Just the last game we played together, now this one. That's it.In post 137, Fykus wrote:So LL whats your mafia experience-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
It makes me think they know who's a threat and who isn't, unlike a real townsperson who has no idea who's going to stab them in the back.In post 162, Robbnva wrote:
Why is it suspicious to you?In post 154, lovelife wrote:Generally I am suspicious of people who seem overly comfortable like Robb and Fykus, however, I think that's just how Fykus plays TBH. Don't know about Robb. I would like to see some real discussion from him about his vote.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
It's not compelling to me either. Honestly, the main person I'm suspicious of is Jord. The only thing that stopped me from changing my vote to him was his claim that he made an introductory post before reading anything, which is, of course, impossible to prove if this is true or false.In post 181, Havo wrote:
I don't have a read on him tbh. I haven't seen anything either way to make me think he's town or scum.In post 178, Backhand wrote:
What are you thinking about robb right now, havo? I just played a game with him, and this feels a little less natural to me.In post 172, Havo wrote:
Just for the record - It was not an insult. Rob and I go way back. He has his own style of playing and he can be wicked good at times. If he's town he's definitely an asset. So i never rush to lynch him. But when he is scum he needs to die like every other scum.
P-Edit: hmmmm ok
The argument against him ATM is not compelling to me. I see his play so far as normal Rob.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Not for lack of trying. lolIn post 191, Tchill13 wrote:
Tchill is here. This day 1 seems a little strange. There's not a stupid wagon on someone by page 5.In post 139, Fykus wrote:Speaking of tchill, where is he?-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I decided to go through Jord's ISO since he is the person I'm most suspicious of.
I really don't like this post. I've already talked about this, but to me, it feels like Jord was attempting to remain neutral on any debates going on and possibly keep out of any for as long as possible. The self-vote enforces my opinion that Jord wants/wanted to be a third party to the rest of the discussion.In post 42, Jordarrian wrote:Hey guys. If you happen to know me, congrats. I have some experience with mafia but I'm still pretty shit at it
VOTE: Jord
This is obviously the play here
Jord claims to have made the previous post without reading anything beforehand, which is an unquantifiable claim for me or anyone else to refute. As I've said previously, feigning ignorance is the easiest defense to make. However, I believe it to be less likely that he made his first post without reading anything, and more likely that heIn post 63, Jordarrian wrote:1. I just said I posted that at night
2. It's possible to make introductory posts before you read the thread
3. I'm going off and on irl so I'm not gonna be able to read until later
Those were just introductory posts, and the way you reacted to harmless posts like that does not sit well with me.chosenot to comment on anything already said.
Backs down, but without changing his stance. He wants to end the discussion before reaching a more finalized and concise conclusion.In post 69, Jordarrian wrote:
How exactly am I hurting town? If you seriously mean my self vote then you need to learn about this great thing called a jokeTchill13 wrote:VOTE: jordarrian
If he's town he's hurting town right now and we shouldn't stand for that. If he's scum then I'm willing to work with him, for now, to lynch his scum self.
I have time to read up now so I'm doing so.
UNVOTE:
Immediately shifts gears off of him and onto Fykus.In post 70, Jordarrian wrote:Scumreading Fykus rn
Wanting to quickhammer on day 1 and won't participate in the RVS stage to find scumIn post 35, Fykus wrote:Cause rvs is boring. Lets wagon someone and end it (inb4 only scum want to wagon peoplre to finish rvs)Sheep vote
Admitted to sheepingIn post 46, Fykus wrote:I liked your little "argument" for your vote on him so I followed suit.
Backs down with little opposition needed to change his mind. Makes me think his push on Fykus wasn't sincere.In post 86, Jordarrian wrote:
Ok I misinterpreted that post then mbIn post 81, Fykus wrote:VOTE: jord
By wagon someone i didnt mean quick lynch i meant put a few votes on them to get a reaction to end rvs
UNVOTE:
I still dont like those sheep posts however.
------
These last upcoming points are, admittedly, a little weak IMO, but still worth mentioning maybe.
Next posts are him jumping on the Robb wagon, again taking the path of least resistance.In post 151, Jordarrian wrote:
Ironically the exact opposite of your logic was used on you.In post 75, Robbnva wrote:neither of those things are good reasons to scum read somebody. I don't think he was serious about the wagoning somebody. Sheep voting certainly isn't scummy and it definitely isn't alignment indicative.
Honestly I just can't see how sheep voting is completely NAI.
He never responds to my comment here, ignoring it to respond to Robb instead. Maybe he was hoping I wouldn't continue pressing him about it since I think I kinda made it seem like I wouldn't.In post 183, lovelife wrote:
It's not compelling to me either. Honestly, the main person I'm suspicious of is Jord. The only thing that stopped me from changing my vote to him was his claim that he made an introductory post before reading anything, which is, of course, impossible to prove if this is true or false.In post 181, Havo wrote:
I don't have a read on him tbh. I haven't seen anything either way to make me think he's town or scum.In post 178, Backhand wrote:
What are you thinking about robb right now, havo? I just played a game with him, and this feels a little less natural to me.In post 172, Havo wrote:
Just for the record - It was not an insult. Rob and I go way back. He has his own style of playing and he can be wicked good at times. If he's town he's definitely an asset. So i never rush to lynch him. But when he is scum he needs to die like every other scum.
P-Edit: hmmmm ok
The argument against him ATM is not compelling to me. I see his play so far as normal Rob.
Sure this can be considered a response to some of what I've said, but I've already explained how I think the "didn't read" claim is a weak one.In post 208, Jordarrian wrote:
Ok? I was proven wrong and was waiting for more posts so I can read into them. Is that a problem?
Also before you ask, I'm not reading because again, I am off and on so I can only read a little at a time
I was going to organize this further with spoiler tags, but I'm lazy. Sorry for the wall-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I haven't read all of your post yet, but I wanted to go ahead and respond to this real quick. I wanted to express my opinions about Jord, but I didn't have time to make a case against him last night, so I just went ahead and wrote down how I felt. I've now made my case against him though.In post 235, Sofiel wrote: Lovelife - null leaning scum.That whole push on people for not liking RVS was iffy to me, but I'm reading it as town hunting for reactions. Plus he never responded to my question about comfort lmao. But #183 and #184 seem scummy to me. Just the language he's using - "the only thing that stopped me from changing my vote to him" and "it didn't really help to lower my suspicions" look like scum separating themselves from a partner who's had a bit of focus recently - "I didn't vote for him because of *reason* but I'm still suspicious!"
oh, and before I forget again
VOTE: Jord-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Hmm, I'll have to look back at their interactions a bit more in depth I guess, as well as the case against Robb, but on the surface I'm in agreement with Havo. The case against Robb just wasn't that compelling to me. However, most of my focus was on Jord, so now that I've organized and recorded my thoughts on him a re-read of the points against Robb is probably a good idea.In post 245, Backhand wrote:
Your jord case is alright, but I'm too suspicious of robb/havo to want to jump on their scumreads.-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Doing some re-reading and I realized I forgot to ask my follow up question to this. How many mafia and town power roles are there in the game?In post 119, Fykus wrote:
There isnt one. Anyone could be any role considered normalIn post 116, lovelife wrote:(also, where can I see the setup matrix or whatever)-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Spoiler:
These posts scream tunneling townie to me.
I don't like how comfortable Havo and Robb are with each other. The use of the word "when" instead of "if" pings me here too. Although, as I learned in my last game, being comfortable with players you've previously played with isn't a scum tell (sorry Fykus, lol).In post 172, Havo wrote: Just for the record - It was not an insult. Rob and I go way back. He has his own style of playing and he can be wicked good at times. If he's town he's definitely an asset. So i never rush to lynch him. Butwhenhe is scum he needs to die like every other scum.
I don't like this attitude. I just think you should want other townies to think you're town so they won't waste their time arguing against you/tunneling on you.
After some re-reading, my opinions are pretty much still the same. I am still more suspicious of Jord than Robb/Havo. I think the main thing I took from all that is Necro is probably town.In post 251, lovelife wrote:
Hmm, I'll have to look back at their interactions a bit more in depth I guess, as well as the case against Robb, but on the surface I'm in agreement with Havo. The case against Robb just wasn't that compelling to me. However, most of my focus was on Jord, so now that I've organized and recorded my thoughts on him a re-read of the points against Robb is probably a good idea.In post 245, Backhand wrote:
Your jord case is alright, but I'm too suspicious of robb/havo to want to jump on their scumreads.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Well yeah, a townies best play is to just be genuine with their interactions and stuff, but if a lot of players express their suspicion of you due to how you're playing, maybe you should change how you're playing.In post 349, Tchill13 wrote:The only people that care about being seen as town are scum lovelife. Town should only have one priority and that is lynching scum. Not looking town.-
-
lovelife Goon
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
IDK why you're leaning on Havo about this, you haven't commented much on Jord either...In post 366, Robbnva wrote:I wonder if havo's stunt was to draw attention from jord-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
In post 75, Robbnva wrote:neither of those things are good reasons to scum read somebody. I don't think he was serious about the wagoning somebody. Sheep voting certainly isn't scummy and it definitely isn't alignment indicative.
That's all you've had to say about Jord all game. I don't think this is suspicious on its own (why I didn't really subscribe to necro's push on you), but if you're going to claim you've contributed a lot to the discussion, that's just wrong and IS suspicious.In post 368, Robbnva wrote:are you high or misremembering?
I was voting jord before I changed to havo, jord was my top scum read and I was pretty much pushing on him before you made your case on him
And you seemed fine just leaving where it's at, no direct response from you and no response to my case against him. Why?In post 369, Robbnva wrote:in fact jordan's last 4 posts were in direct response to me pushing on him-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
I haven't been as active as normal because I've been helping my mom move for the last 2 days, and I hate using my phone keyboard, but I have been reading everything. I probably would have commented a few times if I wasn't forced to use my phone, but it wouldn't have been anything too important. Necros reads list peaked my interest though and it's why I'm muddling through texting this post. I like it a lot over all, I especially like that it came from necro, who is my strongest town read atm. A reads list from another player might have been more interesting, but necros read list will definitely be a useful tool and I appreciate the effort in making it so in depth. Ill be back home tomorrow, where i plan to type up my own read list, or maybe just a player analysis since I feel a lot of players could be either side atm.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Why don't you provide a counter argument or something? Like, I understand that from the perspective of a town player, you would be content with being the Day One lynch so we can start analyzing the votes etc. on Day Two, but "just lynch me already" is something I could easily see a scum saying. I think it would be better for town if you actually participated here, at least give us some more information before you die if you think it's inevitable.
Am I the only one who is confused by this?
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Town
Virtuoso (necro) - Obvious town play here. I like his reasoning and how in-depth he made his reads list. I especially love the extra sense of paranoia coming from some of his posts, as well as the tunneling. I think often good intentions come from posts like that.
Probably town
Hopkirk
|
Backhand - Active and aren't afraid to voice their opinions. Pretty standard town play I would say, but not as convinced as I am with Virtuoso's slot.
Tchill - Not a whole lot coming from Tchill to be honest, but what is coming from him pretty much lines up with how I feel about the game, which is a good thing from my point of view at least.
Could go either way
Robb
|
Havo - Not a fan of either of these players, but I will need to see more before really forming an opinion here. I think a lot of the interactions they've had have been/are moot.
Fykus - Again, I think it's a matter of his playstyle more than allignment, but I could easily see a scum playing as Fykus has.
BBT - I mean, really not enough has come from him for me to form an opinion. I guess lack of participation is a potential scum tell here maybe.
Suspicious of these players, if not already considering them possible scum
CloudKicker - Attitude has not been good.
IgnitionUSMC - Has not been active and I really don't like post 394 or 485 from him. Apparently has opinions but is doing very little to include the rest of us in the reasoning behind them.
Mafia
pisskop (Jord) - I've said it all already.
Sof - Really hasn't stated his own opinions on much of anything, and what he has said has been without committing to one side or another. Seems more interested in other player's opinions on things instead of providing his own. Really hasn't been that active, and what he has posted has been mostly filler.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
lolIn post 516, CloudKicker wrote:The fact that its helpful of not isnt relevant, my play is literraly inherently not a scum agenda because its not sustainable, this is actual t play, im really busy irl and i dont care to gives too much time about this game. Im also shamelessly trying to play a certain way to see if i could pull it off, which is low effort honest play but im still town
Wouldn't saying this skew your little experiment? Honestly this post is a joke.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
@pisskop Why the change of heart? Did I convince you to actually try and play the game?
I actually like pisskop more than Jord, but my reads still haven't changed much (as I predicted they wouldn't). I still think something more concrete like a slot flip or a claim will be needed before my mind shifts gears, but so far my overall opinion of pisskopisbetter than of Jord. I'm still not fully ready to change my read on pisskop's slot, though.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife Goon
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
In post 477, pisskop wrote:lazy, the lot of yaThese quotes, along with the countless troll posts you wrote before these, lead me to believe you didn't really care to play the game, and even possibly wanted to be lynched.
Why did you go from that to actually trying to live.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
What it comes down to is this; You're playing with us. You claim your intentions are pro-town, but that's what I'm not convinced of. Scum could easily do, say, and act the exact same way you have.
Also, you're only really substantial contribution so far has been your push against BBT, but honestly it seems to have more to do with a personal issue between you two than it does to this game.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
Like I said, I think that's just Fykus' playstyle.In post 682, Tchill13 wrote:Just to be clear nobody thinks a wagon on fykus is a good idea? I'm not crazy about how he took his vote off me then immediately voted someone else. That seemed a little odd. I'd also like to know how I'm scummier than cloud kicker at the moment.
Also, I don't like trying to look at buddies on D1. There are just too many possibilities, and it feels like little more than guess work.-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
In post 687, pisskop wrote:Like this unhealthy focus on me coming in guns blazing instead of focusing on the intent and motivation of my posts.
In post 675, lovelife wrote:What it comes down to is this; You're playing with us. You claim your intentions are pro-town, but that's what I'm not convinced of. Scum could easily do, say, and act the exact same way you have.
-
-
lovelife
-
-
lovelife Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 348
- Joined: June 15, 2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
-