Oh ya. pisskop should maybe be counted among the lurkers.In post 485, pisskop wrote:Tomorrow Ill be able to sit down and read.
plz catch up and say stuff.
Oh ya. pisskop should maybe be counted among the lurkers.In post 485, pisskop wrote:Tomorrow Ill be able to sit down and read.
@dunks: can ya respond to this?In post 349, tictac wrote:In post 222, Dunkerdoodles wrote:umm please explain what's wrong with putting someone to l-1 there if i think they're scum?So ya saying here that you knew that was what ya were doing?
There's nothing wrong with L-1. It's the unannounced-part that I have a problem with.
You are aware of the protocol, I've seen ya do it.
tbh I find it disingenuous that ya act like ya don't see the problem here.Did ya have a reason to focus on the "L-1" part?
I was expecting a larger playstyle difference from you.
oh nah, just moving into my apartment.In post 503, tictac wrote:No parallel activity on Aero, unless he's alting.
lol i thought i responded already my badIn post 501, tictac wrote:@dunks: can ya respond to this?In post 349, tictac wrote:In post 222, Dunkerdoodles wrote:umm please explain what's wrong with putting someone to l-1 there if i think they're scum?So ya saying here that you knew that was what ya were doing?
There's nothing wrong with L-1. It's the unannounced-part that I have a problem with.
You are aware of the protocol, I've seen ya do it.
tbh I find it disingenuous that ya act like ya don't see the problem here.Did ya have a reason to focus on the "L-1" part?
nice prodgeVedith wrote:VOTE: Dunker
nice defenseIn post 506, Tchill13 wrote:I'm not scum mulch.
i do think this is towny tho lol
Not really.
oh my god.
Yeah, something like this.In post 494, tictac wrote:"town!Ved is intimidating so it's unlikely that newbscum!cd would put up as much of a fight as he did against him if it's TvS."
I did?
I feel like they could be trying to pocket me but they are tonally soundIn post 518, Creature wrote:UnaBomba also looks bad.